Genady

Being biased is very human-like.

What are the Einstein field equation parameters?

We all experienced situations when we know what we want to say but can't find the right words. Or when we say something and immediately know that it does not express correctly what we wanted to convey. The concepts and knowledge which are labeled by a language are not themselves purely linguistic but are connected to other sensory / motor / affective areas of our experience.

I think that our use of language is determined not only by the intra-language connections, but also by connections between the language and our sensory / motor / affective experiences. IOW, intra-language connections themselves don't have enough information to generate verbal responses indistinguishable from humans. The precedents should also include sensory / motor / affective precedents related to the linguistic experiences.

Yes. (You have to.)

Yes. As I said in the OP,

Like in the picture in OP.

I mean performing one measurement only. IOW, you are allowed to use the weighing scale only once. BTW, we don't know anything about the numbers of coins in the bags. These numbers may be different. We only know that there are enough coins in each bag to solve the problem. This means that weighing bags doesn't help. We need to weigh coins. You are allowed to take coins out of the bags for the weighing.

This is a testable prediction.

Correct. No empty bags. No mixed bags. All coins in each bag are either real or fake.

There are 5 bags full of coins which look identical, but all the coins in some bags are real while all the coins in other bags are fake. Real coin weighs 10 g, fake coin weighs 9 g. Using a weighing scale, identify the bags with real and the bags with fake coins by weighing only once. PS. It is also possible that coins in all the bags are real, and that coins in all the bags are fake.

There are places with such names in PA, e.g.,

I don't think so. Such response requires more than written and spoken material for the foundation. If it is a language model, I don't think this will ever happen.

It is a frame in which expectation value of the electron momentum vanishes.

100 km on its odometer, three times. Each leg's length is 100 km.

On p.1, E=hc/λ is, presumably, energy of a photon. Two lines below, E=mc2 is not energy of a photon. These two E's are not the same thing.

More rigorously,

Mars rover made 100 km South, then 100 km West, and then 100 km North, arriving to the starting point. What was the starting point? This puzzle is easy, but not too easy.