Jump to content

Pbob

Senior Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pbob

  1. Magnetic levitation and the Northern lights disagrees with you . Also a car doing a 180 is not the same as a reversal of polarity . I'm sorry I have to leave this forum , was hoping to find some intelligence here but I was sadly mistaken .
  2. The problem in the world is that in politics , the worlds politicians who have advisors try to come across as smart , using word gibberish rather than open transparency . Me peronally if I was Joe Biden, I would directly contact Xi Jinping and state my case transparently , we all love China and the Chinese people but we feel you are wrong in ill treating minorites in regards to morals . As for Japan , they should also make way towards China in friendship because unless the world finally unites , the world is probably over . We have more important things than war games to consider at the moment .
  3. Why antoganise the Chinese by sending ships through the straight without giving China a phone call asking if they could dock and enjoy the sights of China why they were that way ? Newtons laws about reactions and the world needs to stop these games and become friends , forget history that is the cause of hostility and build a proper future . China is a beautiful country and there should be more tourism , the Chinese should respect that our laws sometimes differ from their laws . I know Dubai isn't China , but giving somebody a decade in jail for CBC oil is bad morals . Laws are the difference in how society interacts .
  4. You say you want to find the accelleration of the masses , don't you mean the acceleration of the ''free mass'' ? Also in which direction do you want to apply the acceleration ? Do you want the ''free mass'' to lose grip and recede -ve or do you want the mass to assend +ve ? F=ma2 in this situation remember and also consider Newtons third law if you want to assend . Also remember the Newtons of down force is the same as if it weren't on an incline .
  5. Oh please don't get upset over nothing . I can not predict the future although space-time is transparent , the lottery numbers are random , each ball having a probability of 1/t in making an appearance . I can do a scientific analysis of the lottery numbers and pick the best chances but that isn't knowing , it also has the chance of failure . However , many Chinese people live in America and China and America realistic have strong ties due to movies and other influences . I am sure China and the USA don't want actually to war with each other so that leaves Taiwan in the middle . Taiwan need to see they are neighbours with China and both can trade with the USA , an agreement should be reached where Taiwan keep certain independence , that simple .
  6. Ok, but a polarisation reversal is not the same as a flip . A flip would consist of a 180 degrees displacement . A pole reversal would consist of a change of direction of ''flow'' . Do we agree on that ? Or do you think the matter of the field can flip causing tidal surges etc , if so what evidence is there that the field is independent of the Earths mass ? IMO the North pole is presently being forced to curve more South Easterly from what information I have read ?
  7. That is not really possible and speculation. The Earths components ''emit'' fields , these fields are ''fixed'' to the mass but can wave etc . For a field to flip it would have to be independent of the mass , free to move . We have never witnessed a bar magnetic poles flip , If we turn the bar magnet , the field moves with the magnet , it is ''fixed'' . If you spin a magnet fast enough the field will curve but remain ''fixed'' . I want to learn maths but how can I learn maths that does not yet exist ? I am trying very hard in maths terms to explain a Higgs field and an expansion of this HIggs field , I can represent it easy enough but we aren't getting any math that gives a value . What if we said , (a+b)(a+b)=1/V Could we say that the HIggs field components are 0.5 and 0.5 times kE , 0.5 and 0.5 ?
  8. The world leaders may like to point out to China that their economy is over if they go hurting innocent civilians in war games . Their economy will be restricted to their own economy with no export of anything . Don't ask a question then if you don't want answers .
  9. I have done some quick research and it sounds like Taiwan committed ''mutiny'' against China and China want to take back control because of the maritime border and close approximity . As for Russia , Ukraine , that sounds like speculation . Why doesn't America politically intervene and be the negotiator, making no threats but reasonable compromise ? Example Chinese Navy and air, ''free'' access to the waters and skies to show there is nothing going on . Have Taiwan agree to let Chinese troops camp there etc , quite easy to show China that Taiwan isn't going to ''stitch'' China up . Also China would boost the Thaiwan economy , whats the problem they are neigbours . The only thing to argue is local laws really .
  10. I can help you with an answer but firstly I need to know some answers . 1)Is China intending to invade Taiwan on moral grounds ? 2)Is Russia intending to invade the Ukraine on moral grounds ? Please state reasons why China and Russia are planning to take control of these countries ?
  11. Added proof : Transition force F=<hf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7dvJj5gB4g Further proof : F=<hf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuSXy32JagA ''The Cavendish experiment, performed in 1797–1798 by English scientist Henry Cavendish, was the first experiment to measure the force of gravity between masses in the laboratory'' Mass is a form of energy F=<hf
  12. I understand that and I admire Faraday for his persistence and work . I am aware of the Higgs Boson that gains energy from the Higgs field but also produces energy in the form of kinetic energy , as it moves through the field . I am not a novice at science but I don't know everything , including some of the maths . I can explain Quantum mechanics quite well and add my thoughts on the mechanics . I was hoping Guass's Law could explain a possible Higgs field but it fails . We are stuck at C/(d/t)=V/t if we was to use Coulombs ?
  13. Fare enough but you confirmed earlier the speed of light mechanism was not known . Isn't the idea of discussion to found new theories and build them up to a testable stage ? I am terrible at maths and asked for help . Some of what I am saying is already tested , water will reach room temperature and other similar scenarios . The Earths magnetic pole is being curved towards ''China'' ? because of this . The Earths magnetic field not independent of the Earths mass , the poles cannot flip but can curve by force . I give up , no idea what people expect .
  14. Light isn't a material but can be viewed as a material when it is a part of a material . What we call photons are points of energy passing point to point through quantum fields . In example light travels through the Earths magnetic field , the earths magnetic field is also light but more of a material because of density . Anology - A sponge soaked with water (Sponge credit elsewhere , not my terms) Light that passes through quantum fields is observabably indistinguishable from those fields and space but detectable by device . I don't think ''solid state matter'' is illuminated in the day time by photons passing through the field ,I think the Suns field maybe reacting with the ground . Why not ? I thought we could use hf to represent photon energy ? Could we express as my previous supplied model : 1ev/F=c ? F yet to be determined ? The obvious is 1ev/(d/t) = c but that doesn't explain the force involved . I have added a second model to the thread , demonstrating the question .
  15. Thank you ,that confirms my pursuit for an answer is not in vane . I have hf/F<hf=c ? Doesn't this explain lights speed mechanism ? Science has never claimed the speed of light was a product of the photon itself . Sciences claim is for the perfect measure of the constant which is a correct measure and been tested loads of times .
  16. Here's what I think , before the Big bang there was never a time when there was an absence of space , the big big started from a high dense state . It is my opinion that this high dense state was of two opposite signed point charges that converged to become dense . I then think that the single formed mass then expanded into space because of transition force , all adjacent space having less energy than the dense state singularity . Then as the formed mass expanded, the density decreased to 0 becoming field like. As the singularity expanded , the interior did work (See Big Bang explanation of work ) . Presently the field is still expanding into adjacent space . a+b/F=V The strong bond is because either signed opposite point charge of the HIggs field does simultaneously occupy the same position . You can't split the bond because of the low density and ''flexibility'' of the whole , the Higgs field has the ability to curve and become more dense . The HIggs field also grows over time , adding produced kE . (a+b)+kE /F =V/t No , not at all and I haven't suggested such . A spider needs a web like particles needs containment .
  17. My question isn't focused on what the Higgs field does , my question is focused on the components that make up the Higgs field which must be in a binded state as explained previous .
  18. Thank you for the link but it doesn't answer why light speeds back up again once exiting a medium . Additionaly a laser shun through a bottom of a glass of water in the dark does not refract . What does the n represent please ? Can you answer why a photon travels at c in a vacuum ? I neither suggested it was F=ma , I implied there is a gravitational transition force at work which I have suggested several conceptions to try explain . hf/F(<hf)=c I think is the answer which also fits in with thermodynamic process . I additionally have supplied a model showing this to back this up .
  19. My apologies , my thoughts just saw the bigger picture and global warming . A battery temporal conserves energy but often the energy is transformed into work rather than heat energy .
  20. The poster you are asking about is not myself , I have been working on this far longer . The Exterior or S for surface of an assumed Higgs field H can be located in either of two positions : 1.Before that furthest observed visual body 2.Beyond the furthest visual body S= r1 or r^n where r is radius and n is n-dimensional or unknown . I assume the Higgs field could be pushing distant bodies away but also distant bodies could be pushed away from central bodies . If you can imagine distant body m2 is attracted to a central body m1 but field H is pushing m2 away because of m/V increase , then that is one possible way of physical cosmological expansion . The second way is that m2 is being attracted by exterior force F(<hf) , expanding with field H . Light does accelerate when exiting a medium , have you ever shun a laser through water ? The distant bodies may be beyond a Higgs field ''event horizon'' , attracted centripetal to the center but pushed away by the HIggs field . (kE/V)/t may increase the density of light within the field interior that in turn , causes field H to expand .
  21. I define a field as an observable , indistinguishable energy from space . For example you can not see the Earths magnetic field between you and visual objects , the field is ''invisble'' to your eyes and transaprent in physics terms . Energy passing through the Earths magnetic field such as television pictures , is also observable indistinguishable from the space it is passing through but detectable by the mind or a mirror . What you need to consider is that we observe the space between visual matter in its precise location because fields and light are transparent and indistingusiahble from space . In simple terms we can see 1ft in front of us because the space , EM fields and energy passing through them fields is not opaque or translucent .
  22. The capacitance of energy in the battery would be turned into motion work but the motion work will still produce kE (kinetic energy) Av (area times velocity) which is considerably less than heat engines .
  23. Is a Neutron required in reality ? If a+b=1 and 0 net charge why is the Neutron required ? To be honest though what happen within the interior of a Higgs field is different physics to an exterior of a HIggs field . A Higgs field can contain mono-pole particles such as free electrons but the exterior has no containment. A free electron will simply transform into radiant energy outside of a HIggs field and disperse to a density of 0 . Charge bottling is a natural process of the assumed Higgs field , a+b required to bottle a+b . Sorry , another new term you hopefully you can understand , Newtons law , every action has an opposite and equal reaction .
  24. Neither , I am discussing my thoughts on the physics the internet has learnt me and asking for help to produce The Theory Of All Theories . I want a share in that nobel prize and if you help me we can all put this theory together . I have proofs , models and dark energy being lights density fits nice , a+b=1/t a singularity that is expanding and pushing galaxies away .
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.