molbol2000

The semiotics of modern medicine is curious. The serpent is an ancient Indo-European symbol of evil and lies, and the cup was earlier than something like a connection with heavenly gods through fire, fire was usually kindled in the cup (even Olympic), and probably this is where the symbol of the holy grail comes from In Russian, the word "doctor" etymologically comes from the root "lie" and in a literal grammatical interpretation would mean "liar": "vrat"-"vrach" So we can answer: Can Science Make us live shorter? (and worse)

The modern type of science defenetly not. Ancient people lived about as long as we do, and a meager increase in life span is associated not with science, but with comfortable conditions If science could do anything, we would have lived at least longer than a few thousand years ago, but even this is not. Scientific advances are truly zero (or not for the common people)

In what sense? Of course, memory is needed anyway. But with its excess, an algorithmic type of brain develops. The type that keeps millions instructions for any case of life. Like PC. It's no good for human evolution. Of course, IQ-testing is far from ideal.But this at least shows the ability to generalize and self-study.

Because "they" not need for clever effective politics and manegers. They need keeping power, and stupid politicans are good as comfortable puppets. In addition, the modern mainstream of power and the image of the intellectual is an autistic type, where not intelligence, but memory plays a crucial role.

Are you talking about just aerobic work without intensivety? This on the contrary kill us due to oxidental processes.

This is morally unacceptable to society. The politicans that allowed a person to commit suicide must resign or, better, kill themself

Carl Hewitt, patriarch of artificial intelligence talks about Actor Model

this has already been discussed

here we are not talking about elementary physical activity it even happens that a person builds up strength, but his muscles do not grow

I do not understand what we are talking about. There are naturally athletes who do not exercise at all, but look athletic, and have strength, there are those who exercise but have no result, or it is insignificant

A person with few glycolytic fibers will never be a good sprinter or weightlifter. Is it named " genetics is affects what you are"? BTW I did not say it, but some propertyes determinated by genetics. There are many things that not determinated and can be achieved in different ways

Okay, that's what I said, that speed and strength are genetically determined. What's next?

Usually lisp recomended, and in times when this area was alive, only lisp was used for design other DSL for concrete problems. But old lisps was differ, they was simpler and very dynamic

by the way, on the topic, there is an opinion that in ancient (pre-Indo-European) Europe there was matriarchy

By the way, this is a very interesting question, and a very important one. Wars in the past era went just for the land, moreover, the most fertile steppe land with good conditions for irrigation(river valleys, such as the Vedic Seven Rivers) was the nomad's lands

In any case, we can say for sure that they found mass use only in the Scythian-Aryan armies, Rome did not use them until its end These cultures are basically horse-steppe. The fact that agriculture was used there does not mean that they were agrarian. Agrarian cultures imply massive involvement of slaves in agriculture

We talks in context of man's warior's properties. Agricultures mainly used mass infantry, this type of the military relied on the quantity and not the quality of the soldiers

I don't think that it's true. As far as I know, rock carvings of ancient archers are found in Andronovo. That's was the Scythians. There is a version that they were originally used for the production of fire

Btw high technologies also always arise in the professional military cultures. That's ferrum, smelting steel, chariots, bows, flamethrowers (Median fire), and even the latest great discoveries such as the computer, nuclear decay and space originated in melitarized Germany Mittani and hicsos were schifians there is no doubt. There are all properties. Egiptians before Hycsos didn't have it

I have simplified somewhat, by the military culture I mean the professional armies, which in ancient times were mainly Eastern and Scythian cavalry and charioteers. This type of agrarian army, when they simply assembled a line of colonus or slaves and drove them in line, does not require masculine qualities. By the way, bows were mainly used by the Aryans and Persians, farmers (Macedonians, Rome etc) almost never used them.

because evolutionarily qualities are preserved only when they are claimed and rewarded Even in sports itself this trend very visible. Almost all sport disciplines are feminized, true man's disciplines with pure speed and explosive power, like sprint, olympic weightlifting, jumps, and so on, are not popular now

I see no contradiction. As a result of agriculture(and mass industry), the type of warrior, and therefore stronger and faster, is gradually dying out, and women become closer to men. I think the end result should be something like an anthill And note that ideology is headed in this direction. In fact, of couse, this is not proof that the difference already disappear. But the fact that women set themselves goals to be like men speaks of a trend. If traditional masculine values disappear, then the men themselves, bearers of these qualities, will sooner or later disappear.

That the male benefits in speed-strength sports are much greater than in endurance benefits (which is essentially a female quality)

A more sporty look is due to the fashion for fitness, but this is just cosmetics, and we are talking here mainly about functional qualities And this video can be misleading, since it is mainly about weakening men. In the old days, a woman warrior was an exception to the rule, this is no coincidence.

More information for thought. World records in marathon for men and women differ by only a few percent. Records in hammer throwing differ enormously, with a comparable throw length, the female sports equipment is almost 2 times smaller Both factors. As I said, in the strength and speed that determines genetics