Jump to content

Kartazion

Senior Members
  • Posts

    569
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Kartazion

  1. 3 minutes ago, iNow said:

    More information needed. Mandatory for whom? Who’s mandating them? Under what conditions does the mandate apply? Are there exceptions? If so, who approves and confirms qualification for exception? What are the penalties for noncompliance? Which vaccine is being mandated? Who pays for them? Is a single does sufficient, or are booster shots mandatory, too?

    This is a simple question. Not an alert.

    But to answer you it depends on which government will apply it, and on who.

    Italy makes COVID-19 vaccine mandatory for all health workers

    Attitudes on voluntary and mandatory vaccination against COVID-19: Evidence from Germany

    England to make COVID-19 vaccinations compulsory for care workers

    COVID-19 and mandatory vaccination: Ethical considerations and caveats

    How a court ruling lays the ground for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination

  2. 4 hours ago, Holmes said:

    This arises primarily from the nature of MOS transistors which are used to build everything, even the basic logic gates are made from such transistors.

    With CMOS there are two switches (transistors) in series and where they meet is the "output" by design only one of these switches is ever "on" (which is where the term "complimentary" comes from, they switch on/off in opposite senses when they are activated).

    When a state change occurs then the transistor that is on goes off and the transistor that is off goes on, imagine two mechanical switches geared together so the when you switch one on the other goes off and vice versa.

    There is a problem though and that is that the transition from off-to-on or on-to-off is never instantaneous, it takes time, perhaps picoseconds but there is a point in time where both switches are half on and half off, that means some current is flowing - very briefly - through both switches and that is where the waste comes from.

    In a static digital circuits CMOS consumes close to no power at all, no transistors are passing current power is only consumed when there are transitions, other technologies can switch faster (or this was the case, not so sure nowadays) but always consume some power whether a switch is on or off.

    So with CMOS the higher the clock rate the higher the number of times we get this half on/off state and so the higher the number of times current is flowing.

    Originally, TTL and CMOS are true all-rounders integrated circuits. TTL technology is tending to be replaced by CMOS technology.

    TTL is the abbreviation of Transistor-Transistor Logic , with Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs)
    CMOS is the abbreviation of Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor , with Field Effect Transistors (FET)

    CMOS in computer science is a special memory chip on the motherboard that stores and maintains BIOS configuration settings. The CMOS RAM is battery powered to ensure permanent date and time indication and to save configuration settings, even when the computer is turned off.

    It is true that CMOS microprocessors were manufactured in the same way as INTEL technology in the 1980s. CMOS technology will ensure the commercial and technological future of MOSFET in integrated electronics, but will be liquidated in 2001.

    Not to be confused with MOS technology

    Here is an example of microprocessor architecture: von Neumann architecture - Wikipedia
    Here is another example of microprocessor architecture: Intel's 4004 First microprocessor on the market, the first successful integration of all the functions of a processor into a single integrated circuit. 



    But to answer the OP, apart from a software resource greedy in CPU, I do not see. Indeed the activity of the CPU is done by software instructions. No software, no resources (around ~1% for computer peripheral activity)
     


    PS: I re-edit the MOS Technology link that wasn't work.

  3. On 6/14/2021 at 12:21 PM, MarkE said:

    If you agree with the author:
    This would imply that complexity can’t be the result of randomness. But if it’s not randomness that could have determined the path of our evolution, which would lead to us, human beings, what’s the non-random factor directing this evolution, then? Or consider of the universe at large, and the 'anthropic principle'. If our Solar System, and its place in a fine-tuned universe, can't be the result of complete randomness, what's this supposed 'non-random factor', then, if it exists at all?

    Nature uses a subtle selection of random combinations.

    If each typist monkey created a universe for each of them, then the result of the likelihood of finding a combination comparable to our human brain would be unlikely.

    Indeed, nature follows a well-defined pattern. Which one is it?

  4. 30 minutes ago, Conscious Energy said:

    “The null hypothesis is that nothing, zero is a physical reality based mathematical conception which we can perceive as an energy, matter, information, space, time free state. Revealing as our common physical, mathematical, philosophical origin, a physical reality based mathematical reference point. I state that in proportion to this physical reality based sense(conception) everything has some kind of mathematically expressible value. Space, time, information, energy, matter. 

    The hypothesis is based on the fact that space expands and time evolves which points that our current moment is bigger and older than the moment before. Following this path backwards on the timeline of the physical reality we arrive at the lowest possible physical state, which I perceive as a space(time), energy, matter, information free state. 0. In proportion to this state everything has value. Everything has mathematically expressible value. Space, time, energy, matter and information. “

    There is a difference between nothing and zero (philosophy of zero).
     

    Quote

    Abstract
    Zero provides a challenge for philosophers of mathematics with realist inclinations. On the one hand it is a bona fide cardinal number, yet on the other it is linked to ideas of nothingness and non-being. This paper provides an analysis of the epistemology and metaphysics of zero. We develop several constraints and then argue that a satisfactory account of zero can be obtained by integrating (1) an account of numbers as properties of collections, (2) work on the philosophy of absences, and (3) recent work in numerical cognition and ontogenetic studies.

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02220-x
     

     

  5. 6 hours ago, studiot said:

    But I didn't get an answer to the Physics content of my post.

     

    But I would go further than anyone else here and declare that a box which contains exactly nothing is impossible as a self contradiction.

    Let us say this 'box' has sides of 10 cm by10cm x 10cm that is it has a volume of exactly one litre.

    So it has the capacity to contain one litre of whisky.

    Now capacity is an abstract noun, to be sure and an old fashioned one to boot.

    But a noun it is and therefore a 'something'

    So by studiot's theorem

    "Every empty box contains something."

     


    The definition of nothing certifies not to have a volumetric size? If so, 'nothing' is the smallest and non-existent quantity ever seen.
     

  6. 17 minutes ago, iNow said:

    Temperature is a measure of movement. If there’s nothing in the box, then nothing is moving, and if nothing is moving there is no temperature by definition. 

    I confess.

    I made a mistake in associating the temperature with nothing.

    So move some nothing is therefore not possible, since there is nothing.

    Does the term 'nothingness' might be more appropriate? In this philosophy section?

    Quote

    "Nothingness" is a philosophical term for the general state of nonexistence, sometimes reified as a domain or dimension into which things pass when they cease to exist or out of which they may come to exist, e.g., God is understood to have created the universe ex nihilo, "out of nothing"

    Nothing - Wikipedia
     

     

  7. 12 minutes ago, swansont said:

    “nothing” doesn’t have a temperature

    It's the story of a box at room temperature where there is nothing inside. Only emptiness, no fields. You tell me now that this nothing inside has no temperature since it is nothing?

    The single definition of nothing is a complex philosophical subject proper to the term.

    But can the quantification of this volume of nothing be expressed by this box?
     

    @swansont You are right. In its proper sense moving from nothing is therefore not possible, since there is nothing.

    But figuratively nothing is something.

  8. 25 minutes ago, swansont said:

    Right after that is the conclusion

    “Receipt of vaccination with either an mRNA or adenoviral vector vaccine was not associated with a worsening of Long Covid symptoms, quality of life, or mental wellbeing.

    It's a good start.

     

    But if you are based on these results from this investigation:

    Quote

    Conclusion

    The results of this survey should reassure people with Long Covid that their chances of experiencing
    an overall worsening of their symptoms after vaccination is small. More than half saw at least some
    improvement to their symptom status. Since COVID-19 vaccinations appear to have the potential to
    improve the wellbeing of those with Long Covid as well as provide protection from reinfection, we
    recommend that more structured, longitudinal trials take place in order to confirm and expand on
    these findings, together with further research on possible mechanisms.


    8bd4fe_a338597f76bf4279a851a7a4cb0e0a74.pdf (filesusr.com)

     

  9. 11 minutes ago, swansont said:

    If nobody posted links until I asked, I didn’t miss them, and all of the links have been to surveys reporting anecdotes. They are not scientific studies, for the reason I have already given.

    The study is led by Yale faculty members Akiko Iwasaki, Aaron Ring, Wade Schulz, Charles Dela Cruz, Erica Spatz, and Harlan Krumholz.
    Study probes vaccines’ effects on people with ‘Long COVID’ | YaleNews


    Result: 8bd4fe_a338597f76bf4279a851a7a4cb0e0a74.pdf (filesusr.com)

    "LongCovidSOS launched a survey in partnership with the University of Exeter and University of Kent to find out how people with Long Covid respond to COVID-19 vaccines"

    41 minutes ago, swansont said:

    So far you’ve provided zero links to scientific studies

    It depends on what. But there you already have a confirmation here:

    Are vaccines safe in patients with Long COVID? A prospective observational study | medRxiv
    "When compared to matched unvaccinated participants from the same cohort, those who had receive a vaccine had a small overall improvement in Long Covid symptoms, with a decrease in worsening symptoms (5.6% vaccinated vs 14.2% unvaccinated) and increase in symptom resolution (23.2% vaccinated vs 15.4% unvaccinated) (p=0.035). No difference in response was identified between Pfizer-BioNTech or Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines."

  10.  

    1 minute ago, Phi for All said:
    !

    Moderator Note

    The links to said sources aren't showing up properly.

     


    Long Covid symptoms ease after vaccination, survey finds
     

    Long COVID: Vaccination may ease symptoms

    7 hours ago, swansont said:

    What do you base this on? I missed any link to studies showing that the vaccine eliminates issues of long COVID.

    Yes for sure you have missed.

    But eliminate is a big word. Rather improve.

    7 hours ago, swansont said:

    If we're all vaccinated evolving a resistant strain is much less likely. It's happening because people aren't vaccinated, and are not following (or being required to follow) the protocols to stop the spread.

    I don't understand. People who are vaccinated carry the virus and the virus continues evolving a resistant strain. But are you telling me that it would be eliminated if all people are vaccinated?

  11. 4 minutes ago, CharonY said:

    Not sure what you mean. We have plenty of diseases that have a  significant  burden  on public health. Influenza is responsible for 10k deaths in France. Covid is likely to add to it but it is not the first nor will be the last.

    6 hours ago, CharonY said:

    What we do not know yet are things like overall health burden, especially if we take long-haul symptoms into account.

    Ok. So let's say the impact of a seasonal flu.
     

    But I was also referring to the impact of long-covid

  12. 5 hours ago, CharonY said:

    Now, the hope is that with vaccination the virus will be more manageable like other disease outbreaks that we deal with. 

    "With its massive vaccination campaign, Israel believed it had put the Covid epidemic behind it. But the country is facing a rise in new cases, linked to the Delta variant, which makes it fear the arrival of a third wave." says L'obs in France
     

    5 hours ago, CharonY said:

    What we do not know yet are things like overall health burden, especially if we take long-haul symptoms into account.

    This is comparable to a handicappe of a large part of people who were not. Covid damage cannot yet be assessed at all socioeconomic levels, but it will be significant. But more than half of patients who suffer from long-term Covid would see their state of health improve from the first injection of the anti-Covid vaccine.

    The biological root of humanity is now damaged.

  13. 6 minutes ago, exchemist said:

    Yes but out of 23, only 3 have gone to hospital with it. My 93 year old father got Covid at his nursing home after being vaccinated, too. But he had no fever, was just rather breathless for a week (no oxygen needed) and lost his appetite, and then made a full recovery. 

    UK experience with the Delta variant is that the vaccines are effective at preventing serious disease, provided you have had both shots. This finding seems to be based on the rates of hospital admission since the Delta variant started to spread. Collecting data on whether vaccines prevent a person testing +ve is harder to obtain. I have not seen any numbers on that.  

    The people in nursing homes are very fragile and their immune systems are weak. It is not surprising that they can catch the virus after being vaccinated. What matters is how ill they get. The vaccines do seem to help, considerably, with this.  

    Yes the Delta variant is not virulent for most of the vaccinees.

    My remark is more oriented on the durability of the virus itself.
     

    Will we all be vaccinated and the covid will still be there? And evolves to the vaccine-defying variant?
     

    48 minutes ago, swansont said:

    What rate are people getting hospitalized or dying? 

    Very little. Why?

     

    Now there is the "Delta plus" variant.

    Delta plus: Scientists say too early to tell risk of Covid-19 variant
     

  14. Impossible to know. It is not stipulated. But According to the French Ministry of Health, 79% of elderly people residing in nursing homes have received a first dose of Pfizer vaccine.

    Can I change my vaccine at the second dose? An ongoing trial to assess the risks Peut-on changer de vaccin à la deuxième dose ? Un essai en cours pour évaluer les risques

    "A "vaccine interchangeability" trial was launched in England in February. France started theirs on May 28. The second injections with a different vaccine were already being given in France, but only to the 553,000 people under the age of 55 who had received a first dose of AstraZeneca."

  15. Quote

    Delta variant, also known as lineage B.1.617.2, is a variant of lineage B.1.617 of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 The Delta Variant 

    The Delta Variant is progressing and now infects people vaccinated in France * 

    Will it last to the point of wondering if its evolution of the mutaion at the level of the Spike protein would be possible over the variants to make the vaccine deficient?
    And to spend the whole Greek alphabet there? Indeed the vaccine does not prevent it from remaining and the epidemic will not over until a natural extension of it?


    * The Delta variant has mainly affected people already vaccinated in the Landes nursing home Le variant Delta a touché en majorité des personnes déjà vaccinées dans l’Ehpad des Landes

  16. 3 hours ago, Conscious Energy said:

    With the entangled probes they are able to receive and communicate data instantly and so the space barrier could be solved pointing out that distance isn’t really a barrier.

    The principle of teleportation uses quantum entanglement. Mathematically, to be upstream of the source, that is to say the singularity, is intersserant insofar as one breaks the laws of the celerity of the light during the measurements of the entangled pairs, due to the distance which separates them thereafter. Remember that you are only allowed one measure of the entangled pair.

    The question is whether a superluminal teleportation is possible by the 'unknown mechanism' of the information transfer of the entangled pairs. See EPR paradox - Wikipedia

    and Inégalités de Bell — Wikipédia

    Bell's theorem - Wikipedia

  17. 6 hours ago, swansont said:

    More than half of the people having persistent symptoms after 6 months doesn't sound good.

    We just don't have the same sources.

    Almost 25% of COVID-19 Patients Develop Long-Lasting Symptoms,

    2 hours ago, CharonY said:

    ... 50% of hospitalized patients show long-covid symptoms ...

    I have a source in French that says the same thing. Another who says up to 60% of hospitalized patients.

    Acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients | Scientific Reports (nature.com)

  18. 20 minutes ago, swansont said:

    More than half of the people having persistent symptoms after 6 months doesn't sound good.

    It should be noted that these 60% of people with longCOVID were hospitalized patients. And not 60% of people who have had the COVID. But yes it's serious.

  19. On 6/20/2021 at 1:59 PM, studiot said:

    This is about the density of many electrons in materials (look it says so) It for for consideration of metals, semiconductors etc.

    But why ask me when I'm showing the real?
     

    On 6/20/2021 at 1:26 PM, studiot said:

    What is the density distribution of the electron ?

    The electron density distribution is the same from the start.

    196533810_electrondensity2.jpg.fd78b9e119e1eb023b0e6870579a3d3d.jpg

     

    On 6/19/2021 at 7:55 PM, Kartazion said:


    1350565955_densitydistribution.PNG.33b061b086565af035bb7087e5af0675.PNG
     

    On 6/20/2021 at 12:41 PM, studiot said:

    For instance your graph from the Khan academy is not a graph of probability density. Nor is it a graph of the quantities shown in arnav's parent thread.

     


    Not a graph of probability density?

    Can you expand?

    Thanks

  20. Could the government(s) in the world have used the lockdown-covid to be able to better channel, structure and observe the people through technologies, on the same principle as the freeze atoms (cryo-ME, laser,...)?

    The census and classification of the different types of people profiles could have been done thanks to technologies such as GSM and Internet since a physical interaction between people had become impossible. Better learning of people and their way of thinking could have been digitized.

    The gelation of atoms is used to be able to immobilize the electronic activity, in order to be able to visualize their structure.

    Indeed, the increase in human activity has been observed in certain digital society such as GAFAM, or other like electronic messaging, during this period of lockdown.

    This subject borders on the paranoia of mass surveillance already denounced by a certain whistleblower.

    What do you think about it?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.