Kartazion

5 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

It returns to the same starting point at a later instant in time. 

Yes. This time is identify for my part of the main time. This main time elapses in all cases, whether there is creation of an oscillation or not. I will explain myself later on this point.

5 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

In a CTC, it would return to the starting point at the same instant in time wrt to a clock stationary there - so the situation is different from an ordinary oscillator.

The main time includes the oscillation, if there is oscillation ; but the oscillation itself, with the particle, creates an intrinsic time son of main time.
Obviously it's a bit technical. I am not using the oscillation as a clock, but rather an increlmentation of the position of the particle which it creates an intrinsic time between each position.
From postion B to postion B' there is an intrinsic time step, then we have the phase of oscillation which lasts, and the main time that elapses. To this is added the dilation.

Otherwise, if I'm wrong, there will be a transformation, not of Lorenz, but similar to explain it with CTC.

I estimate a minimum of one more year to be able to explain reasonably what I have started to tell.

I started with this: 

16 minutes ago, Markus Hanke said:

The outcome of the experiment does not depend on the particulars of the detector apparatus, or even on the layout of the setup itself; it depends only on what information is accessible to the experimenter. 

It is precisely the interest of the photosensors , to be able to study the interference according to the behavior of the experimenter.

18 minutes ago, Markus Hanke said:

This means the world line will return to its original position in space at the same instant in time. 

Quite simply, isn't the phase position of an oscillator? Upon retraction, the particle returns to its original starting point to then retrace this line, and following the expansion?

This implies that there is a constant connection between the big bang singularity and the matter.

Ps: It is always an honor to be able to talk with an expert, which is not my case. Thanks everyone for that.

23 minutes ago, joigus said:

CTCs involve time as a dimension too.

As I will go into speculation I can already give a draft. But give me some day to better explain it.

Time dilation:

Here is an example of a triangle-shaped object of a spherical structure:

Legend of the distribution of time granted from the effective position:
po = origin point = 0,0001ns (position A)
→ = flow = ~0s (distance between A et B)
point(n) = dot matrix = 1ns (position B)

(line1 + line2 + line3 + line4) = cycle

cycle x frequency

From the first to the last point of the complete object, will be formed in about 9ns (~ 9,0009ns) for one cycle. The total refresh of the structure ends in about 21ns (~ 21,0021ns) for one cycle.

Here if we continue this same structure with additional lines to form a second object in the form of an identical triangle called object2, we have:

(line1 + line2 + line3 + line4 + line5 + line6 + line7 + line8) = cycle

cycle x frequency

The object2 is formed around 13ns (~ 13,0013ns). Either the same object is about 4ns longer on the high lines of the structure, than its double in ~ 9,0009ns on the low lines. The object2 on the upper part of the structure is about 4ns older than its brother on the lower part. Because the effective position sweeps all the free positions end to end, it is logical to find in this case the extension of time when forming entirely identical objects. Subsequently we can understand that the movement of the object2 annihilates the scanning of the effective position, and thus the object2 is formed faster than if it remains motionless.

I thought that the worldline is the flow of the particle between its two positions of A and B.

4 minutes ago, Charles 3781 said:

Don't you mean, "according to scientists", the whole Universe was born from nothing?    

Suppose you were asked, "Where did your  computer come from?"  And you said:  "That's a meaningless question - it came from nothing."   How would you respond?

Scientists have alerted to this fact. Suddenly this gives people wise like us.

But yes I know. Let's say the universe at its beginning was no bigger than a pinhead.

6 minutes ago, Charles 3781 said:

According to current theory, didn't the entire Universe spring from a minute "Black Hole" smaller than a proton. Then expanded outwards. To create trillions of stars, galaxies and so on.

According to many people, the whole universe was born from nothing.

It's been a while since I wanted to reproduce the double-slit experiment by placing photosensors on the reception screen.

The question is already how and by what process are the impacts marked on the screen?
 

34 minutes ago, Moontanman said:

You might have hit the nail on the head, I have an aquarium beside the tower... But no, HTTPS is not in the address... 

But you can see the http? If it's without the s, do not connect with a login and password, because it means that your connection is not secure. In this case you must reset your OS (windows or mac) But you should at least see the padlock on the web browser.

31 minutes ago, MigL said:

How exactly does your oscillator's worldline get back to a previous co-ordinate ?

Moderation will have to split.

Position A or 0 does not move. Only the position B can be different. The particle therefore oscillates between A and B, and then between A and B'
To be exact the cycle of oscillation is  A → B → A → B'→ A

I don't know if you understand what I'm trying to explain. But give me some time to write something more explicit
 

There is also this article https://physics.aps.org/articles/v13/99

Quote

A new theory proposes that time is a fundamental property of the Universe governed by an oscillator that interacts with all matter and energy.

Maybe something with UTF-8?

Do you always have the https padlock in the address? This is at first sight the most important.

But the problem probably comes from the web browser. But it may be something else. Once I had a pc that had caught the humidity, and was having at the start the problem of writing characters on the screen...

I think the solution is in /usr/sbin/sshd file. https://linux.die.net/man/8/sshd

So I recovered the source of it with:

wget -c https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/openssh-8.0p1.tar.gz

and decompress with:

tar -xzf openssh-8.0p1.tar.gz

Now I try to see where I can insert my code before compilation with ./configure -h
There are several interesting files related to the deamon. If you have any idea which one...

The purpose of this manipulation is to be able to create a log list of the connection listening on a dot matrix printer.
IOW for each connection attempt, my printer lists the client's information into /dev/tcp/192.168.x.x
As said above we already have this information in /var/log. 
 

I had already made this example of CTC. It comes from an oscillator

23 minutes ago, Sensei said:

Your question is ambiguous. I am wondering whether you're talking about instructions of TCP protocol or instruction like command-line or what else?

Command line instructions. moth got the idea of TCP packet.

30 minutes ago, Sensei said:

If you want to learn PID you can try:

Dump all active processes to a text file before running something,

dump it again after running something,

compare the differences between text files..

and you will know which processes were created by "something".

 

You can make a script. Dump, compare, display differences, wait 0.1-1s, repeat.

I think I'll have to dissect init

init(en)

/etc/init.d/

or

/etc/rc.d/rc.local

9 minutes ago, joigus said:

Exactly my usual points about this question. +1

Yes it's ambiguous for others who Demystifies Entanglement and Quantum Nonlocality or find A Closer Connection Between Entanglement and Nonlocality

But I understood that both have nothing to do.

20 minutes ago, joigus said:

Correlations are there since the very start of the state preparation. So nothing non-local is implied.

It is true that the correlation was subject to debate namely the transfer comes at the start or after.

For the rest it is a nice explanation. Thank you
 

41 minutes ago, Markus Hanke said:

Quantum entanglement is neither to do with non-locality, nor with action at a distance; 

Bravo!

+1

One day Einstein later famously derided quantum entanglement as "spukhafte Fernwirkung".

18 minutes ago, moth said:

I don't have Wireshark running on this machine, but i don't think it will show the files that are activated , only the service. I think you can get the  files from top or ps (ps -au maybe)

A little later in the day I'll try just to see   tcpdump -i lo

But I think the solution comes from an SSHd type daemon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(computing)

Therefore I know it's PID

But not it's pidfile into /var/run

Normally I use tcpdump in shell which is like wireshark in graph. But these programs list the listening and give the IP as well as its destination port. But maybe you want me to understand that in the packets there would be the call of the file or the service on the server? Good idea.

I'm going to try on 127.0.0.1

Being on no computer forum, I try here to expose my problem. Indeed I want to create and manage a specific log file (we already have /var/log which runs it) but I want to intercept the bits/words of these instructions.

What are the files and the directory that starts the execution of the first instruction when we calling ssh or sftp?  Knowing that there are the sftp or ssh deamons that listen and the /bin/ssh or /bin/sftp scripts that start the service.

I thought it was just the files in the /bin directory that started when calling the service. This would therefore amount to recompliling the /bin files.

There may also be the solution of PID Process.

Thanks.

3 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

And the interaction may well be instantaneous.  But there is no information that can be communicated this way.

The sentence came from wikipedia, as well as the following:

In physics, action at a distance is the concept that an object can be moved, changed, or otherwise affected without being physically touched (as in mechanical contact) by another object. That is, it is the non-local interaction of objects that are separated in space.

5 hours ago, Bufofrog said:

from quantum information theory...

and from quantum information (not theory) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_information

Any change in state of one entangled particle automatically affects the other. We must therefore be able to explain how "information" is transmitted from one entangled particle to another.
 

The "information" can be given just before entanglement by hidden variable and retained in memory during the entanglement, for after discovering its state(s).

Or the information is given later and is transmitted from one entangled particle to another when we want to read its states.

This is why we speak of nonlocality and action at a distance for this specific observed case. This is valid for the quantum teleportation.
 

@Markus Hanke ?
 

12 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

from quantum information theory which states that, during measurement of an entangled quantum state, it is not possible for one observer, by making a measurement of a subsystem of the total state, to communicate information to another observer. 

But this rule is related to an observer, not an observable since the observable can be indicative for both observers. 
In other words if the spin is read from one side, then the spin of the other entangled particle can be read at an opposite value.

There you have the Action at distance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance

That is, it is the non-local interaction of objects that are separated in space.

2 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

No. Quantum entanglement does not allow for the instantaneous transmission of information. 

In the principle of nonlocality or not:

Either the information is given at the start of the entanglement, then the information is given thereafter until it is read;
Or the information is given later when we discover the state of one of the two praticles which acts on the other not instantly at c speed?

11 hours ago, joigus said:

Not really. Hypothetical time travel uses curvature, and time dilation is a different thing altogether and does not require curvature. Perhaps someone can provide a more complete explanation.

Yes. It's because I read for an acceleration: Whether it is time dilation or time travel, the common responsible constant is the speed of light.

Here is an excerpt from wikipedia of time travel which implies a link with time dilation in relation to c 

Quote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_travel#Time_dilation

The theory of relativity states that the speed of light is invariant for all observers in any frame of reference; that is, it is always the same. Time dilation is a direct consequence of the invariance of the speed of light. Time dilation may be regarded in a limited sense as "time travel into the future": a person may use time dilation so that a small amount of proper time passes for them, while a large amount of proper time passes elsewhere. This can be achieved by traveling at relativistic speeds or through the effects of gravity.

But I understand that there is a difference between the Quantum Spacetime and Spacetime.

8 hours ago, joigus said:

It seems that the key idea is to find plausible trajectories in phase-space for particles in the background geometry.

In the same genre: Spacetime from bits
 

Quote

Spacetime, reconstructed
Theories of holographic duality feature a correspondence between a gravitational system and a strongly interacting conformal field theory (CFT) living on the system's boundary. Through this correspondence, the CFT encodes the geometry of spacetime in the gravitational system. Van Raamsdonk analyzed the role of entanglement in this theoretical framework. Instead of considering a single CFT, the author's starting point was a collection of CFT “bits” that are mutually entangled but do not interact with one another. The spacetime that these bits collectively encode was then shown to be arbitrarily close to the one encoded by the original CFT, suggesting that entanglement plays a crucial role in the emergence of spacetime.
 

Quote

In the anti–de Sitter/conformal field theory approach to quantum gravity, the spacetime geometry and gravitational physics of states in some quantum theory of gravity are encoded in the quantum states of an ordinary nongravitational system. Here, I demonstrate that this nongravitational system can be replaced with an arbitrarily large collection of noninteracting systems (“bits”) placed in a highly entangled state. This construction makes manifest the idea that spacetime geometry emerges from entanglement between the fundamental degrees of freedom of quantum gravity and that removing this entanglement is tantamount to disintegrating spacetime. This setup also reveals that the entangled states encoding spacetimes may be well represented by a certain type of tensor network in which the individual tensors are associated with states of small numbers of bits.

Time travel and time dilation use the same mechanism. Is not it?

Or how to qualify this difference?

2 hours ago, Suvid Sahay said:

I am trying to develop a peer to peer project and I need to communicate between those peers by sending huge json data. 

Is it to use blockchain technology or something else?

WebRTC? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebRTC 

In block data technology you also have SAN servers which is interesting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_access_server

JXTA? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JXTA