Ghideon

What is "chronovibration"?

I agree. @Externet what is the purpose of sharing the documents? Majestic 12, also known as Majic-12, and MJ-12 for short, is a purported organization that appears in UFO conspiracy theories. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12) The wikipedia page have several references, for instance FBI comment on documents like those posted above: https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic 12/

You are correct and I guess it depends on premise and any options one might have? Want to join a trip to a new planet? I want to know if it is habitable. We will send our kid to a new planet. I would like to know, like Jor-El*, if the planet is habitable. We have to go now or we are doomed! Ok, I'll join and hope for the best. But to be honest, I have no idea about what could motivate extra terrestrial beings, if they exist. If the goal is to use armadas of self-replicating machines and panspermia to propagate through the universe then I guess data return is of less concern? True; I did not refer to any sightings, just provided possible answers, from a human perspective. (just to be clear: I no not think any sightings or UAPs are in any way related to any aliens activities) *) Otherwise I guess Superman would have been in trouble; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jor-El

Home destroyed due to bad management or disaster(s)? propagation?

I'm a little late, I think all aspects are sorted out already. But I had started drawing a picture of different aspects of the relative velocities in the scenario. Posting in case anyone finds it helpful: Rocket A is traveling from space station a at velocity VAa (Aa denotes that the velocity is the relative velocity between a and A) Rocket B travels from station b at velocity VBb . The rockets will meet head on and VAa=-WBb Equations: 1: a and b (the space stations) are at rest relative one another, in the same inertial frame of reference 2: When each rocket's crew measures the velocity of the other approaching rocket, relative to their own rocked, the velocity does not match the sum of velocities relative their starting points. (Assuming the correct sign is used since velocity is vector) 3: for low speeds the sum of velocities is a reasonable approximation 4: Rocket A will measure its speed relative its starting point to be the same (with negative sign) as the rocket B will measure relative it's starting point 5: Rocket A will measure leaving a with the same velocity that it is approaching b (minus the sign) 6: In any case the relative velocities between the rockets, measured by crew on board A, is greater than the rocket's velocity relative it's starting point a (and symmetrical for rocket B and crew) 7 (now shown) observers on a or b will agree that the rockets will meet half way between a and b. The sum of distance traveled by A plus B can be more than a light signal could travel in the same amount of time. (did this in a bit of a hurry between other things, please point at errors)

Fiber optic cables operate on the principle of total internal reflection, not the photoelectric effect.

You are probably referring to electroluminescence, not photoelectric effect.

Are you by any chance using translation software? If so it is not very good; I think "technobabble" is the correct definition for the above.

No. As far as I know modern touchscreens typically work either via resistive technology or capacitive technology.

The opening post does not make much sense; what do you wish to discuss?

Can I assume that AI content can be discussed in the Computer Science section as long as it is used in correct context? Example: A member wants do discuss the scientific reasons for choosing between competing AI-based prompting strategies: "In the linked peer reviewed paper the LLM version X was observed to provide an improvement of 3.6% in test Y when using AI generated prompts based to template Z, below is a table of examples." The context in the example is science related to LLM's rather than the application of scientific-looking output of an LLM. In this case discussing AI content may be appropriate outside of speculations section? (English not my first language; so the answer may possibly be obvious)

Did you read what the AI generated? From your document: Your post looks like a joke about LLM usage. Was that the intention?

Ok. The sun's apparent motion across the sky is due to the earth's rotation. That means that a sudden shift in velocity of the suns movement requires the earth rotation to suddenly change. No such change in earth rotation was observed during the eclipse. It would have been a rather cataclysmic event. So the equipment and how it was used is relevant if you want to know how the video looks the way it does.

I agree. Modern equipment (hardware and software, phones for instance) may have image and video stabilisation. So the impression @Sensei mentions might be enhanced if the clouds are kept stable by the hardware/software so that the sun looks like it's moving quick.

Can you show, mathematically, how you transform between two inertial frames of reference in your conjecture? Especially; highlight any differences or similarities (due to your ideas) when mathematical equations are applied to brains and clocks* in different inertial frames of reference. Also highlight if any postulates or assumptions deviates from the mainstream. I know the established physics (Lorentz transformation etc) so I'm curious about a comparison. (Your explanations raises many questions regarding the logical consistency of your conjecture and explanations; I will return to these issues later) *) Your explanations seem to propose that human brains and time keeping devices does not follow the same physical laws

Can you explain this in the context of special relativity? Especially how the "internal clock" works for observers in relative motion.

Done. I bring £1000,000 to your house, zero times. Maybe you are confusing multiplication with subtraction when you create your examples. (edit: User banned while I was writing)

from your document: It seems completely incompatible with established physics, can you elaborate? For instance, how do your ideas explain the photoelectric effect?

I may depend on what your computer is connected to. Even if you have a dynamic IP address the device that responds to ipconfig /renew command does not necessarily hand out a different IP address. Note @swansont's spot-on response; renew the lease means that the same IP can be reused. An example of two situations where same IP is reused (there are others and a thorough answer would require insight into details): -Static lease (DHCP reservation); the IP is reserved for a specific device -the server may assign the same IP address because it's the next (or only one) available.

Ok! As an engineer, perhaps you could consider revisiting and rewriting your explanation, focusing on ensuring that the mix of scientific terms and concepts is presented coherently and aligns with established scientific principles and theories?

Your code does not seem syntactically correct.

Your descriptions do not match program code you have posted. What program do you try to describe?

What does "within range" mean? What do you mean by "approaches"?

The question is copied from https://www.iypt.org/problems/, @flyer6 can you be more specific regarding your interest in the competition?

You may have misunderstood the output from the LLM*. Your claims does not seem to match the code you posed above. What are your results from testing your program? Ok, you missed the point. *) LLM=Large Language Model