Jump to content

fredreload

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by fredreload

  1. Distance reducing sensor, I wonder what that would sound like. The way Google car works is it uses a laser scanner lol. But right, last time I've heard there is zero casualty with the Google car and those should totally be implemented on every single cars. Thing is for Google car to work here in Taiwan it might still requires a bit more work I think, it is on the centimeter scale here, dead ends, all sorts of chaos and traffic.
  2. So you guys know that there are cars which detect when it is about to bump into something like the Google car. Can we apply the same thing to humans? We know humans bump into humans at low speed is not dangerous, but if you are about to hit a driving car you'll wish that Google car mechanics is applied on you lol. Anyway, personally I think the output would be like a noise, since you can't really control a person to stop. Or a glasses that display message, or some mechanical force that would swing you side way, or make the car stop with RFID. I think this would be pretty cool This is the current Google self driving car overview. I'd say either implement the collision detect mechanics on all the cars, or on a glasses.
  3. ATP is essentially ADP+phosphate, well, as I've posted this before in Physics Forum, and got banned , not because of this post. The idea is biological and chemical company is capable of cycling and creating ATP synthetically as someone mentioned. The only thing that is in my mind right now is electrolysis lol, but well, clearly this is one of the information that I am missing. To me creating chemical energy ATP and extracting Rubisco enzyme from plant does not seem like that hard of a work, but if it happens to be, you are free to point it out. The rest is just an alcohol making process. Sugar can become start through an enzyme. But again carbohydrate is not protein, so that would be another essential element if you want to keep the body moving
  4. I am not sure about its efficiency, but it's the same Rubisco Enzyme that plant uses. It only works 12 hours a day for plants is because plants need sunlight to get ATP, if you can get ATP for Rubisco enzyme, which I believe you can generate chemically, you don't need sunlight. I assume sunlight goes on for 12 hours a day, but if you just extract the Rubisco enzyme you can have the reaction for 24 hours a day providing ATP and carbon dioxide for reaction until Rubisco enzyme breaks down. And that's without having the microorganisms involved, but you somehow insert Rubisco Enzyme gene into the bacteria it is a different story.
  5. Geodesic could be the world line of a particle. World line has quite an interesting explanation. You are good to pull this out lol. We'll call it a draw ?
  6. This post suggested light's photon weight is too small to be affected by gravity http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/107930/why-can-light-photons-bends-in-a-curve-through-space-without-mass And what's null-geodesics?
  7. Oh snap, limit that you can move the most distance with the smallest amount of time passing by. It's like if the shape of space is "/" and I move like "\", I run into space and time flows. But if I run parallel to the space in this "/" direction. I get closer to a limit and time would not pass. If you don't like the idea of space, think of water flowing down stream, if you move against the stream, you experience the maximum time flow(resistance), if you move with the water down stream, you experience no resistance(no time loss). This is assuming space is finite. This would get you the structure of space time, simply measure distance versus time. Now I would not dare assume that you can slip through space time. I just think as long as you can identify the space time's structure you can unveil many mysteries Well, another property of space is that it contracts when you move at high speed, why do I assume that, because of distance reduction from relativistic effect. Now many people are probably going to argue with me on this too. I am looking at it from the space time's view so, it's not really something you feel getting shorter, but an actual distance reduction measured with a timer so, I'll leave it at this http://phys.org/news/2009-12-spacetime-hints-quantum-gravity-theory.html https://www.quantamagazine.org/20150430-space-time-interactive/ P.S. And now for my question Strange, what makes the light curve in space? Light is not affected by gravity because it has no mass.
  8. But I've read on a .org site that space has a quanta, if space does not have a quanta we won't exist, it would be a gello and nothing in it. And if it has a quanta it has a limit. I have a feeling we are going to be stuck on this argument, we'll call it a draw
  9. Depends on what you mean by dying, if you lose consciousness, it would be bad. So if a dream is so realistic that make your consciousness fade away, it could happen. But as many dreams as I've had 365/year, I am still alive. I'd even wish I can have my consciousness transfer somewhere. Anyway, don't worry about it too much
  10. If I have to modify a plant I will modify it 24/7, I dunno what it will turn into, as long as it lives. I mean increase the rate of reaction, that's the only way to test it. I would like to run a computer simulation if possible, but, currently computer software is not at the molecular stage yet
  11. We can't see space, but we know it has a shape. Why? Because light bends when it travels in space possibly due to relativity. So why doesn't light travel in a straight line even though the space is bent? That means the space has a limit or shape, that light travels in certain direction of this shape will be less affected or more affected by relativistic effect. Now we can't see space, because space is transparent, but it has a quanta, a space is built grain by grain as I've read somewhere, because it needs a unit, or else nothing would exist in it. Lastly, since it is transparent, and we can pass through it, how do we detect it? The same way that light curves with space, we use light photon to detect its shape. My speculation is to have light photon, or any elementary particle, travel in every known existing path from a center. This path, with enough speed, would create a relativistic effect and we measure this relativistic effect where it is at it's strongest. Let's say if the S shape take 3 seconds to travel but the V shape only takes 2, then we might be able to assume that S shape is closer to the shape of the universe, keep in mind that it needs to be measured in equal length and time abiding by the relativistic effect we can observe. If there is a way to reveal the invisible shape of the universe, it is even better. Now if you go over this limit something cool might happen. It's not like if you move in certain direction your hand disappear or something but, maybe we enough speed we can run parallel to the shape of space a quanta. Keep in that space converge, in on direction, it does not expand, so the distance only gets shorter, with the paradox of relativity, not expanding. Your turn doctor Strange In conclusion, space has a shape, space has a quanta, and space has a limit. We should try and exploit this limit
  12. Hmm, you produce carbohydrate with microorganism having the rubisco enzyme so that you can produce carbohydrate 24 hours a day as long as you got ATP. The only problem with the rubisco enzyme is that it has a slow reaction rate so people has been thinking about ways to enhance its speed genetically. But hey, 24 hours a day is 12 more hours than what the plants can produce. Right the product is not clean, but from what insulin suggested, the unclean product protein will be cleaned and cut off to get the final product, we'll get food as clean as insulin is, that would be my guess. The idea of producing unlimited food is that people around the world will no longer have to worry about food. And after a while you'll be able to cycle them from waste to produce ATP, and the primary source of that is phosphorous, which we have abundant in storage as fertilizers. Right, having bacteria producing meat is cool, there is the stem cell hamburgers that has been around and with the idea of growing meat from meat cells but most of them lack the taste of the original meat. You can get stem cell burger for 12 dollars last time I've heard. Well the bacteria produce protein, and meat is protein. It will probably be some kind of meat loaf, I think, but if you have a better idea as to what the complete product of meat would look like that could be produced by bacteria, let me know about it. The idea about plants producing fruit is still a mystery. But again I believe they are all enzyme based. You would be able to make fruit juice from bacteria. Economic wise the price of the food should lower, but this is only if the whole mechanism is placed in production. I don't know what Novozyme is doing but if they really do try they can get the carbohydrate production to work. Others might be working on it in secret to boost the starch and sugar production. You think this idea will ever be placed in use? Let me know
  13. We all now bacteria can be used to make certain food product, but what if we use the bacteria to make food such as carbohydrate, fruit, and milk? I got the idea from how bacteria produce insulin and through my previous understanding of the plant's Kreb cycle. All you need is Rubisco enzyme, ATP, and carbon dioxide. You might even be able to create meat protein but I haven't don research on that one. In the end, I believe bacteria can be used to create food products, got any suggestions? Thanks
  14. I agree automation is picking up. This is where human use their head for money, we have consciousness, and that is something machine lacks. Let it be drawing or writing codes or writing a story, we need to put our consciousness into doing what would be useful with our minds. Robots can't think This is where it becomes multicultural, we got McDonalds here in Taiwan, but we don't have that noodle shop in America. Who is to say if that would be ideal for the economy, but I sense this idea has potential P.S. Think of different countries as more like a container
  15. Hmm, just make it better lol, more jobs are good, higher paying is good. In Taiwan the cost of goods have been rising, yet the salary does not increase. I'm earning 36000NT a month, divide it by 30 to get dollars. How I wish I can get a U.S. salary job, could it be I don't have enough skills, could be, since I'm rather lazy lol. I'm worried about stock as a friend mentioned that it contains risk, so it's not the first thing I look into. Well if I open a restaurant in America it would be good, embrace the whole multiculturalism situation
  16. Doctor Strange, I don't want this to be involved with politics. Our sourcing job is good, I mean from my point of view in Taiwan I've always wanted to work in an American company. Higher pay and better vacation days. With that said it seems it is almost not possible for companies to be out sourced to America. I mean I'd like to see that famous noodle chain or Chinese restaurant in America from Taiwan lol. Thing is staying rather stagnant, and yes without having a programming way of running this algorithm I wouldn't know how it would turn out, but I thought this would be an interesting idea
  17. My idea is to out source jobs to as many countries as possible. But any ideas are welcomed here, stocks, investments, you call it. P.S. Let me know if this thread is in the right place
  18. Fiber optics would be single directional though, as John mentioned. I still like the idea of a suit, but it seems hard to achieve. To being with, how do you make light behaves like a fluid. The only thing I've read is slow light in a BEC with laser cooling. Not sure if the direction of light can be freely changed, if you can control that, there would be more degrees of freedom, maybe interfere it with other electromagnetic waves? I'll have to look into Strange's post again Can someone explain this clip? Is it bending electrons or photons?
  19. You are right, the distance traveled would be greater, so it is not perfect cloaking. Well, one thing I found out from the video is essentially that the image can be passed through the convex lens in this way and having the image recovered after it passes through. Of course you can't build a sphere out of convex lens, and the image would probably get inverted on the other side, but probably some tweaks and it would work, convex then concave http://www.passmyexams.co.uk/GCSE/physics/concave-lenses-convex-lenses.html
  20. Thanks for the detailed explanation!
  21. https://www.cnet.com/news/invisibility-cloak-uses-lenses-to-bend-light/ P.S. Thanks Google! P.S. Well, didn't come up with the lens idea
  22. Well if you are at the center of the spherical invisible cloak, it will make you invisible, doctor Strage got it, it will look something like this |||||| |/ \| |( )| |\ /| ||||| The trick is to not create any reflection on the material surface and tries to guide the flow of light around the object back to its original position
  23. I agree with you, that is the example I saw. Thing is I want to improve it and what I have in mind is a spherical shape object capable of deflecting light to the back as light enters. For instance when light enters from the front it would deflect it to the right by 45 degree, then another 45 degree to the left, and exit from the back, sort of like how diamond works. That way this sphere would exist and look as if it is invisible without any other mechanics. | \ / | light source
  24. Something that would reflect light by 180 degrees on all sides, something like this. http://cdnassets.hw.net/dims4/GG/eaebca3/2147483647/resize/876x%3E/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdnassets.hw.net%2F5b%2F54%2Ffd55d90747c189812134d33e35f1%2Ftech02-internal-20reflection-legacy-20reflector-drawings-tech-tcm47-2169643.jpg
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.