Jump to content

fredreload

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by fredreload

  1. Well I was kdding(non offensively). The real answer is I am trying to find an algorithm to get the amount of energy I need. If this answer is of importance to you @@? Yes but stars has pressure in their formation. I want to pressurize my plasma so it becomes dense.
  2. Something like star formation, the factor I need to add in is pressure. I was kidding, man you are too serious = =.
  3. Space jumping >.<. Is it possible to increase air pressure in a confined magnetic field?
  4. I am not sure I found it on Google when checking if plasma is paramagnetic @@, below quote from Wikipedia shows that plasma could be controlled by a magnetic field though. Magnetic confinement When heated to fusion temperatures, the electrons in atoms disassociate, resulting in a fluid of nuclei and electrons known as a plasma. Unlike electrically neutral atoms, a plasma is electrically conductive, and can, therefore, be manipulated by electrical or magnetic fields.[16]
  5. It is not in the paper, I am looking into plasma fusion reactor like Tokamak. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak Thought this can be applied to Argon plasma with magnetic confinement, just not the fusion part. Noted above
  6. I guess we need to contain it in a magnetic field coils. Argon gas is not paramagnetic but plasma is paramagnetic.
  7. Silly Strange always hiding something :D, I found the full article with a schematic of the experimental setup. Though they did not mention the material used for the chamber. http://epsppd.epfl.ch/Praha/WEB/98ICPP_W/C019PR.PDF
  8. Thanks for the calculation, appreciate it. You are missing three zeros, it is actually 10^13 joules. Conversion from KJ net three zeros.
  9. My fault, it is over meter cube as I checked just now. This is from an article. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1143/JJAP.38.3712/pdf?fbclid=IwAR0DqxsXt7ZqCLMHI_Rxopgn2iujRPBLWk4w7PAu73uEjO8YPKTrbdR3B1Q This is on 150atm(150 times atmospheric pressure), which get 10^27 electrons per meter cube. Although I am yet to find an energy equation for plasma. Do I assume 1 ev for each electron, kindly give me an answer @@ thanks, (1 eV = 1.6 x 10-19 Joules)
  10. Introduction: As you know, Argon gas is an insulator used in the light bulb, but when it is given enough current it creates a chain reaction on the gas molecules and turns into Argon plasma like those inert gas globe shown below. This post is about theorizing the amount of energy/electron density you can generate from Argon gas. Observation: So I took a look at ICP listed below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductively_coupled_plasma It generates an electron density of 10^15 electrons per cm^3 using electromagnetic inductive process, but that is not enough energy for me, I am looking for 10^31 electrons per cm^3. To achieve this I will have to first compress the Argon gas to some multiples of the atmospheric pressure, I am thinking 5 atm. But I will need a container to do this, I am looking for a really strong type of glass that would withstand the pressure and the thermal energy that would be generated in this medium some 1 million kelvin. But at 5 atm it is just (10^15) * 5, it is not anywhere close to 10^31, and I am not even sure if you can light up the Argon plasma at this pressure. I am thinking of beaming a laser at this Argon gas pressurized in a glass medium and hopefully it would achieve the result of 10^31 electrons per cm^3. Like what Iron Man did here. If you are thinking of plasma fusion it generates an order of 10^21 electrons per meter^3, much less than the desire results. Although it is much more easily controlled through a magnetic field. So my question is. 1. How do you generate a 10^31 electrons per cm^3 of electron density from Argon gas? Let me know at what pressure(atm) and the way to light the plasma gas uniformly(wire spark vs laser). 2. What type of material could withstand the heat and pressure generated from 10^31 electrons per cm^3 density of Argon gas?
  11. Seriously? 63 views on Time Machine?
  12. With a 1200 tesla based on the field formula F=B^2/2u would generate a force of 5.7*10^11N/m^2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet
  13. Yes the magnetic field exerts a force on the conductor. You grammer nazi caught me before I can edit my statement. A record breaking magnetic field strength is 1200 tesla, I wonder how much energy it could generate on a metal plate. Ya, it does not need to be a photon, just energy, thanks for the work you put in Studiot.
  14. Yes against a conductor, thanks for the correction.
  15. But magnetic field is an energy, that in itself should work.
  16. Well it's based on speculation. When you got a powerful source of gamma ray, like from a nuclear fall out in mid air. The gamma rays ionizes the air, stripping it of its electrons and create plasma. Now a magnetic field is not EM wave, but a powerful magnetic field could have the same effect, but whether it would emit an EM wave based on impact is in question.
  17. I was thinking of a conflicting magnetic field against a conductor would generate photons. But anyway, I changed my mind, I won't lock my equation in a vault, my equation will be free of use and thanks everyone for the support. I will be busy with work for the next few days so, have fun.
  18. Apologies, post 3 and 4(magneto idea from you) and Endy and Strange are valuable , antenna method is proven not possible unless having a new type of antenna design(spherical perhaps), magneto idea is me trying to generate photons from magnetic field with a conductor. Sorry for putting non conventional physics not in speculation and get defamed three times for it = =, well it is alright. Love you guys. And I thought substituting it with V is cool, guess I have to, lock it in a vault somewhere. P.S. Don't look for me, but alter my timeline for me. I want a bright future.
  19. Well you guys can show me Lorentz transformation sometimes, I'm calling it a day :D .
  20. That is what I am trying to do with this thread, given I did not work out the Lorentz transformation, mistake on my part. To generate enough energy equivalent to length contraction done by that of a black hole. Clearly I got my own distance equation to work with, speculation. Do I not get to choose who I reply to now = =? Or are you interested in the thread?
  21. Cuz they locked just about all my topics = =, and i got a -10 rep I am scared of the members
  22. His explanation says that energy bends space time and that energy is from E=mc^2. I substituted velocity for c clearly usually that is not the case(because length contraction is only achievable in light speed) by what 50%? But not all the time. And why is this wrong? It is wrong because it is not in speculation? What is wrong with my formula?
  23. Did I not provide the Cisco guy example or is his idea also non real Physics? So I am the only guy that thinks you can generate light through magnetic field on a conductor? How do your distinguish real from not real again with your Physics?
  24. Well if you guys do not yell out the first thing that comes into your head from my statement, is magnetic field consisted of photons "No", and or try to bend rules like Osmium has a huge mass I would appreciate it if you guys would help me construct this photon machine(getting a live subject through would be hard). Given, sure if I completely skip the equation E=mc^2. And it seems you guys only stick to classical physics, is that even a rule in the guidelines = =? Forgoing all the hard work and creative ideas people put into posts, well if that is a rule I would follow and stick around longer. Yes my Kung Fu might not be strong, nor is misleading my info. Sounds harsh, but you got good ideas Strange.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.