Mike Smith Cosmos Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 The universe appeared to have started when Symmetry broke .! Meta stable states appear to freeze when two electrons have no preferred direction! Business partnerships of equal partners often fail in the face of difference of opinion! Is inequality of partnerships , a necessary attribute of nature , in order to work ? Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPanic Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I don't know... my instinct when I read a post like this is to try to shoot a gaping hole in it to show with several examples that there are many equal partnerships. Two hydrogen atoms seem to partner quite well? Business partners may put in a similar amount of money, and fare well. However, I argee that in almost all organisation, whether in nature or our own human organisations, there is an inequality, where some initiate (lead, hunt, dominate, etc) and others respond (follow, run, submit, etc). Whether the one inequality is related to the inequality of basic particles in the universe, I don't know. Where are you going with this? (Why do you care?). I don't see the predictive power of this theory, so I don't know what is the value of this, even if it is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) Inequality creates disequilibrium which causes action. if everything was content and in internal equilibrium like the inert gases nothing would happen.. The answer is 'yes'. Edited June 11, 2015 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Smith Cosmos Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 I don't know... my instinct when I read a post like this is to try to shoot a gaping hole in it to show with several examples that there are many equal partnerships. Two hydrogen atoms seem to partner quite well? Business partners may put in a similar amount of money, and fare well. However, I argee that in almost all organisation, whether in nature or our own human organisations, there is an inequality, where some initiate (lead, hunt, dominate, etc) and others respond (follow, run, submit, etc). Whether the one inequality is related to the inequality of basic particles in the universe, I don't know. Where are you going with this? (Why do you care?). I don't see the predictive power of this theory, so I don't know what is the value of this, even if it is true. When first going into business when I was a Naive young Sprog. I was advised by some old , passing ,seasoned, sage-like businessman. " Don't go into a 50 % 50% partnership, they don't work . It did not mean a lot ,to me at the time , as I was not about to go into one . I remember his words quite clearly . And as life went by , I saw the result of many equal partnerships . They often seem to flounder, dissolve or split up, or worse go sower .I did get into one , sort of equal , ( no dominant partner ) business partnership . It went bad , it dissolved , it did not work . On reflection , and hindsight , I think I can see why. Even if it is only in ONE aspect for a time , having a partially dominant member or partner for that aspect , makes things happen , things get done , rather than argue endlessly , for a better way. And is this not taking a lesson from the environment. Does not the material universe and many living things in the animal kingdom , function that way . It's difficult to bring up the subject of human couples, but it has to be said because it's there. I am not a marriage guidance councillor , but I imagine successful couples, accommodate the other taking the lead in certain aspects, while the other member takes control ,in a different aspect. The material universe , seems to get ' hung up ' , when confronted with stultified , or equal lock up or lock out situations , so I am led to believe. Mike Inequality creates disequilibrium which causes action. if everything was content and in internal equilibrium like the inert gases nothing would happen.. The answer is 'yes'. A difference in levels , constitutes a potential . And a potential creates a flow or tension. Energy flow and work done , start to take shape. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 When first going into business when I was a Naive young Sprog. I was advised by some old , passing ,seasoned, sage-like businessman. " Don't go into a 50 % 50% partnership, they don't work . It did not mean a lot ,to me at the time , as I was not about to go into one . I remember his words quite clearly . And as life went by , I saw the result of many equal partnerships . They often seem to flounder, dissolve or split up, or worse go sower .I did get into one , sort of equal , ( no dominant partner ) business partnership . It went bad , it dissolved , it did not work . On reflection , and hindsight , I think I can see why. The right question to ask is whether they failed more often than non-partnership ventures. If most new businesses fail, then most partnerships will, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 This reminds me of the efficiency of China. Since the party has first and final say on everything stuff gets done. There is no public consultations, lawyers arguing and so on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Smith Cosmos Posted June 12, 2015 Author Share Posted June 12, 2015 (edited) I am certainly interested , that under the environment of exactitude present in quantum or micro behaviour of matter. Here I believe the necessary lack of equality is not always present , which can give rise to both stable states and ' stuck' states. I am not very versed in this , but have heard of ' meta stable states ' perhaps this could be clarified . I personally suffer from ' rabbit in the headlights ' phenomenon . Namely the rabbit does not run away , stares at the headlights and gets run over. If I get too many problems at once, rather than dealing with them sequentially , ." I stultify ". And have to do Nothing ,( like staring into the headlights ) . I go meta stable ? Mike Edited June 12, 2015 by Mike Smith Cosmos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Smith Cosmos Posted June 13, 2015 Author Share Posted June 13, 2015 (edited) It would seem ..Metastable states ... Is a wide area of influence across many area of science, It appears in Electronics., chemistry, lasers, fundamental physics, atomic and quantum physics, and many more besides. It is concerned with getting into a temporary situation , whereby phenomenon may be experienced for a period of time, ranging from fractions of a second to large Indeterminate time. Only when a ground state is reached is there no further to go. ( apart from going to higher states of course ) See link :- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metastability Quite how this figures in partnerships , I am not sure ? Mike Edited June 13, 2015 by Mike Smith Cosmos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Quite how this figures in partnerships , I am not sure ? Metastable loosely means that you can consider the system to be stable over some large time scale. Of course, 'large' depends on the details of the system. I guess partnerships can be 'metastable' in the sense that you only have to wait long enough for problems to emerge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now