Jump to content

Balancing chemical equation? Help!


rainingspiders

Recommended Posts

I'm supposed to balance the following equation:

[latex] HCl + As2O3 + NaNO3 + H2O -> NO + H3AsO4 + NaCl [/latex]

 

Anyways, I got stuck stuck here...

 

[latex] HCl + As2O3 + NaNO3 + 3H2O -> NO + 2H3AsO4 + NaCl [/latex]

 

No matter what I do I couldn't get H and O to balance out at the same time! When I balance O, the H is out of balance, and when I balance H, O is out of balance! Augh!

 

How do I do this?


Ok, I have solved it to here...

 

[latex] 2HCl + As2O3 + 2NaNO3 + 2H2O -> 2NO + 2H3AsO4 + 2NaCl [/latex]

 

There are 11 O on the right and 10 O on the left.

 

... Now what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Empress: Yeah, I have tried it and it didn't work out for me. However, I just finished solving it, using the algebraic method. Thanks for the help though! Should I post how I solve it here so other people can see?

Sure. I'm curious to know where you ran into trouble with the half equation method? Did you remember to exclude spectator ions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I'll try my best. This is my first time trying to explain Chem so sorry if it's a bit confusing.

 

First, I assigned a different variable for each compound of the equation. The numbers of these variables will be the coefficients of their corresponding compounds. So...

 

HCl = a

As2O3 = b

NaNO3 = c

H2O = d

NO = e

H3AsO4 = f

NaCl = g

 

I then found out how much of each element is on the reactant side and how much of each element is on the product side, with respect to the variables. Using the following equation...

 

# element X on reactant side = # element X on product side

 

For H,

we have "a" amount of H and "2d" amount of H, so we get

a + 2d amount of h on the left side. We have 2d because for every compound d, we have 2 H's. Do the same on the product side, and repeat for all the elements you have.

 

Doing so gets us...

H: a + 2d = 3f

Cl: a = g

As: 2b = f

O: 3b + 3c + d = e + 4f

Na: c = g

N: c = e

 

I set a variable equal to 1. I chose the variable "a", just because.

 

Doing so gives us

 

a = 1

g = 1

c = 1

e = 1

 

so...

 

H: (1) + 2d = 3f

Cl: (1) = (1)

As: 2b = f

O: 3b + 3(1) + d = (1) + 4f

Na: (1) = (1)

N: (1) = (1)

 

The only functions we have that have variables in them are...

 

Equation 1: 1 + 2d = 3f

Equation 2: 2b = f

Equation 3: 3b + 3 + d = 1 + 4f , which simplifies to 3b + d = 4f - 2

 

We want to solve the system of equations. We know what f is, so substitute 2b for f into equation 1 and 2.

 

Equation1:

1 + 2d = 3(2b)

1 + 2d = 6b

 

Equation 3:

3b + d = 4(2b) -2

3b + d = 8b - 2

d + 2 = 5b

 

Solve the system of equations for d.

 

1 + 2d = 6b >>> -5 - 10d = -30b

d + 2 = 5b >>>> 12 + 6d = 30 b

combines to

7 + 4d = 0

d = 4

 

plug in d into equation 1, solve for b, then use be to solve for f.

 

Doing so gives us

d = 7/4

b = 3/4

f = 3/2

 

So listing all our coefficients...

a = 1

b = 3/4

c = 1

d = 7/4

e = 1

f = 3/2

g = 1

 

Multiply these values by the least common denominator, which is 4. This gives us...

a = 4

b = 3

c = 4

d = 7

e = 4

f = 6

 

g = 4

 

Write out the chemical equation with the corresponding coefficients.

 

[latex] 4HCl + 3As2O3 + 4NaNO3 + 7H2O -> 4NO + 6H3AsO4 + 4NaCl [/latex]

 

If we check, we see that the equation balances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I get with half equations.

 

Excluding spectator ions, the equation comes to:

 

H+ + As2O3 + NO3- + H2O --> NO + H3AsO4

 

The As goes from As (3+) to As (+5) and the N from N (+5) to N (+2)

 

Oxidation:

 

As2O3 + 5H2O --> 2H3AsO4 + 4H+ + 4e

 

Reduction:

 

NO3- + 4H+ + 3e --> NO + 2H2O

 

Balancing the electrons gives:

 

3As2O3 + 15H2O --> 6H3AsO4 + 12H+ + 12e

 

4NO3- + 16H+ + 12e --> 4NO + 8H2O

 

Combining:

 

3As2O3 + 7H2O + 4NO3- + 4H+ --> 6H3AsO4 + 4NO

 

Adding the spectator ions back:

 

3As2O3 + 7H2O + 4NaNO3 + 4HCl --> 6H3AsO4 + 4NO + 4NaCl

 

Edit: Your method seems to have worked (I haven't checked it), but it seems awfully complicated. Where were you going wrong with the half equations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trial and error is a very poor way if approaching a question like this. If you use the appropriate methods, you will spend much less time on it.

Ye but what I meant was there's this many x atoms there so same on the other sides. There's this number of y atoms here so let there be y atoms of this on the other side. Then I erase it and start again.

And ye I guess it depends on the question. Trial and error is a much quicker method

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.