Building home-made RC Helicopter
#1
Posted 20 March 2007 - 02:15 AM
If it won't work to make it out of the car, what can I use? I want to use capacitors, because Li-Po batterie cost too much. What motor should I use, etc. Thanks for any advice.
#2
Posted 20 March 2007 - 02:27 AM
You'll need batteries (or a fuel cell haha) somewhere. Even AA or AAA or 9V might work - it all depends on the circuitry.
Irgendwann fällt jede Mauer.
Confutatis maledictis,
flammis acribus addictis:
voca me cim benedictis.
#3
Posted 20 March 2007 - 02:29 AM
If I where you I'd build some sort of test rig using the motor just to see if it's powerfull enough with a set of rotors to lift itself.
Also most of the small cheap RC heli's I've seen have had 2 sets of rotors, I speculate that they spin in oposite directions (I dunno for sure, should be able to tell you in a couple of days) I'd guess this was to try and ballance out for consorvation of angular momentum.
#4
Posted 20 March 2007 - 04:26 AM
But back to the OP, I think you could do such a thing, but a capacitor would not give a very long flight. I recall having a styrofoam plane that would charge for 5 minutes and flew for about 5 seconds lol. And that didn't even have heavy servos or anything for control. I'd say your best bet is looking for a cheap battery setup, they can't be that expensive these days(hopefully).
#5
Posted 20 March 2007 - 08:54 AM
i've pulled one of those cars apart before, the steering mechanisim is pitifully simple. it's a magnet between two counter wound solenoids. i assure you, you cannot control enough of the aero dynamics on a chopper with just 2 channels.
if you're going to use one of these, i'd suggest making a plane.
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. however, several million electrons were greatly inconvenienced.
#6
Posted 20 March 2007 - 06:22 PM
In actual helicopters, two full-sized rotors will counter-rotate (opposite directions) to preserve angular momentum AND to provide even-er lift (there's a fairly complicated effect in here that I neither remember the name of nor can explain. It involves vortices, if I remember correctly).
Irgendwann fällt jede Mauer.
Confutatis maledictis,
flammis acribus addictis:
voca me cim benedictis.
#7
Posted 20 March 2007 - 10:19 PM
http://www.raidentech.com/rcufo.html
have capacitors too, as well as the mini RC cars. Batteries have a limit on how fast they charge because they are chemical based. Capacitors also have a long life, something like 1/2 million cycles and you can pull them out from everywhere. I was thinking of making a semi-conductor pad so that when I want to recharge, I can just trow my heli on there and wait a few seconds.
I also have some lithium-ion cells from a laptop battery. They are a lot longer and a bit wider than AA batteries, but are surprisingly light. They also give quite a kick, so I might use those. The only thing I am afraid of is that I can't get enough lift from a motor, so I might end up making a plane.
Does an airplane require less thrust to stay in air as opposed to a helicopter?
thanks!
#8
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:21 PM
I want to build a home made electric RC Heli, very small and light. I have one of those Mini RC racers, like these and i want to convert one into a heli. They are powered by capacitors, but I don't know If the motor and all can produce much thrust. I can make prop blades out of nylon to keep it light. Does anyone have any suggestions, ideas, or even better; has anyone actually made their own electric micro heli?
If it won't work to make it out of the car, what can I use? I want to use capacitors, because Li-Po batterie cost too much. What motor should I use, etc. Thanks for any advice.
One of my friends is into models and he always goes to this site for advice.
http://www.rcgroups....orums/index.php
Bee
#9
Posted 28 March 2007 - 01:11 PM
a plane has a longer wing span than a chopper so it moves more air more efficiently. the prop on a model plane provides relatively little force.
if the rotor on a chopper makes a downwash of the same mass per time as a plane, it's going to have the same lift for the same efficiency.
the problem with a chopper is the uneven drag on the rotor. the tips move very fast and the inside provides very little lift. you need quite a hefty motor to give enough torque. high rev motors are invariably lighter.
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. however, several million electrons were greatly inconvenienced.
#10
Posted 5 April 2007 - 03:17 PM
Edited by mooeypoo, 14 September 2009 - 03:18 PM.
#11
Posted 28 April 2007 - 06:50 AM
#12
Posted 28 April 2007 - 09:13 PM
Irgendwann fällt jede Mauer.
Confutatis maledictis,
flammis acribus addictis:
voca me cim benedictis.
#13
Posted 9 August 2008 - 01:35 PM
#14
Posted 9 August 2008 - 02:27 PM
"[Time] is one of those concepts that is profoundly resistant to a simple definition."
~C. Sagan
http://thescienceforum.org
#15
Posted 10 August 2008 - 04:38 AM
#16
Posted 10 August 2008 - 11:33 AM
Yep, by now I got LiPo and brushless motor with computer radio. I'm hauling ass. Thanks.
Can we see photos?
#17
Posted 10 September 2009 - 05:16 PM
I will for someone kind ?
Edited by mooeypoo, 14 September 2009 - 03:18 PM.
#18
Posted 12 September 2009 - 08:28 PM
flies, but hard to control, the tiny thing is a spectacular knot of genius engineering, especially for being so affordable.
and you've got the right idea with capacitors, so you have to charge it every 7 minutes or so.
#19
Posted 14 September 2009 - 03:20 PM
Also, posting your email address in a public forum is a recipe for spam. To all those who got their emails removed: You're welcome.
~moo
If I was helpful, let me know by clicking the [up arrow] sign ^^
Get tips and tricks on how to get into grad school in science!(From the American Institute of Physics)
Visit my Science@Home Website: http://www.smarterthanthat.com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












