Butch Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 fine mathematically prove the existence of a universe that expands whose thermodynamic process accordingly due to that volume change causes the CMB. Then on top of it solve the horizon and flatness problem that inflation solves. While your at it solve the distribution of the first generation stars, the early large scale structure formation using Jeans equation. The distribution of quasars which is due to the higher density past. As well as the measurements of the integrated Sache wolfe effect. The baryon accoustic oscillations of the CMB. However most importantly solve why we see cosmological redshift in the first place. If you believe your little equation solves those problems your dillusional Gladly, and I mean that! Tomorrow.Good night you brave souls! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) lol we shall see. I expect nothing less than mathematical accuracy. Though do so on speculations not in mainstream physics section. We've pushed the moderators flexibility enough in this thread. Which is to look specifically at the CMB not alternative models. Edited November 18, 2016 by Mordred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 ! Moderator Note Thread moved to speculations. Some evidence and maths else this is about to be closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) Fine, and? I am not contesting physics... Yes you are. Everything you say contradicts all the science cosmology is based on. can you mathematically explain the beginning of time? No. There is no reason to do that. I can explain the presence of cmb Go on then. I have asked you to do this repeatedly, but you ignore the question, change the subject or say "it appears by magic". Let's see an attempt at a scientific explanation. Edited November 18, 2016 by Strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butch Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) lol we shall see. I expect nothing less than mathematical accuracy. Though do so on speculations not in mainstream physics section. We've pushed the moderators flexibility enough in this thread. Which is to look specifically at the CMB not alternative models.Agreed... It will be a bit my batteries need charged (mobile).OK, let's take a stroll in time from t0 to t+1. If we look back at our universe @ t0 relative to our new place in time it appears that the whole thing has collapsed to a single point. Is there any other entity like this in our universe? Edited November 18, 2016 by Butch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) OK, let's take a stroll in time from t0 to t+1. If we look back at our universe @ t0 relative to our new place in time it appears that the whole thing has collapsed to a single point. Is there any other entity like this in our universe? It is not valid to extrapolate back to t = 0. Our theories no longer apply before that point. A theory of quantum gravity might tell us more. At least one attempt to model this using quantum theory suggests that the universe is infinitely old. And never infinitely dense. Edited November 18, 2016 by Strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butch Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 (edited) It is not valid to extrapolate back to t = 0. Our theories no longer apply before that point. A theory of quantum gravity might tell us more. At least one attempt to model this using quantum theory suggests that the universe is infinitely old. And never infinitely dense. You are of course quite correct it is only a false perception. If we go back to t0 the universe appears quite normal.I think you understand now? Is the cmb red shifted? Edited November 18, 2016 by Butch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 If we go back to t0 the universe appears quite normal. Please stop posting unsupported nonsense. Don't post anything else until you have a complete mathematical model that supports your claims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butch Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 Einstein did not have the math, but thankfully he had mathematicians. Wish I had a mathematician. You let me know if you want more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Einstein did not have the math, Nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butch Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 Look it up. Einstein had abstract thought, not math. Lol, Good thing I am a fisherman, you people are tough catches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Look it up. Einstein had abstract thought, not math. Nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Look it up. Einstein had abstract thought, not math. Lol, Good thing I am a fisherman, you people are tough catches. Read his papers, you're just wrong. ! Moderator Note Thread closed. Didn't meet our minimum requirements. You may not reintroduce this topic. If you have the maths you may report this post petitioning for the thread to be reopened. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.cc169fb67f9c969aeace623286b9b5e6.jpg)
Recommended Posts