Jump to content

# Antiuniverse?

## Recommended Posts

This has been bothering me for awhile now I've been thinking a lot and the basic law of everything is that both sides of an equation must be balanced. So imagine that our universe is one side of the equation I've always wondered what is the other side of the equation. Now my theory is that on the other side of the equation there is a completely opposite and inverse version of our universe that cannot exist I'll refer to it as the antiuniverse. Confusing right? I'll try to explain. The basic thought process is that if our universe exist the antiuniverse has the exist as the nonexistent opposite of our universe. This means that it does not exist but it is still present so it can "balance the equation". Still confusing? I'll explain some of the antiuniverse's concepts to help you understand.

Universe Vs Antiuniverse

#1 Since our universe takes up a positive amount of volume, the antiuniverse takes up a negative amount of volume (which helps you understand why it does not exist.)

#2 The laws of our universe do not apply to the antiuniverse meaning that even first law of thermodynamics *Matter cannot be created nor destroyed* doesn't apply but the opposite effect, that in the antiuniverse can create and destroy matter. This will apply to all other laws.

#3 As our universe expands the antiuniverse shrinks. So that means before the Big Bang when matter in our universe was at a very condensed primordial state the antiuniverse was closer towards having a nonnegative volume.

There are more concepts but these 3 are the easiest to explain.

I also have a few hypothesis for why the concept of an antiuniverse might be true. No science exist today can explain where matter came from and whether it was created or it has always been here. The Antiuniverse can ALMOST explain the Origins of matter and our universe. Referring back to the first law of thermodynamics and how its flipped in the antiuniverse, if matter can be created or destroyed in the antiuniverse then maybe all if the matter in our universe can be traced back to the antiuniverse. (In reference to balancing equations) If the antiuniverse somehow created matter then equally it would have had to destroy matter in order to maintain balance, but since there was no matter to destroy in the first place the created matter and the *nonexistent* destroyed matter separated and made our universe and the antiuniverse. This kind of explains why the antiuniverse is real but doesn't exist, This also explains why the antiuniverse takes up a negative amount of space.

I want to elaborate but I can go on about this for hours, basically does anyone agree or disagree with my statements? I would like some feedback to further understand this.

##### Share on other sites

#1 volume is distance * distance * distance,

if distance is measured in meters, volume is in meters ^ 3.

So, you don't even understand definition of volume.. Right?

#2 matter can be created and destroyed (=converted to photons or other lighter pair of particles).

See pair production http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production

See annihilation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation

I want to elaborate but I can go on about this for hours,

Have you thought about Hollywood script-writer job? It's for you. They can make stuff up every day..

I would like some feedback to further understand this.

You should start from learning the real physics.

f.e. read article by article from Physics History Database

Too much effort? There is just 200+ entries... But you asked by yourself..

##### Share on other sites

The issue is its completey theoretical. The whole concept behind it basically states that it doesn't follow normal laws of physics I.e. Your definition of volume.

Maybe this will help me understand your reasoning. Help me answer this. If our universe exist with a positive amount of matter what balances with it?

##### Share on other sites

The issue is its completey theoretical. The whole concept behind it basically states that it doesn't follow normal laws of physics I.e. Your definition of volume.

"mine definition of volume" is the same across entire human kind:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume

##### Share on other sites

Actually thinking about if that type of universe did exist I doubt any level of thinking could define its laws

##### Share on other sites

Actually thinking about if that type of universe did exist I doubt any level of thinking could define its laws

Then it's not physics..

Physics is observation of phenomena, measure, record on graph at time t, and make prediction how it will behave in the future (function describing measured object).

One can measure temperature of boiling water, tell the others,

and the next time repeat experiment receiving the same result.

##### Share on other sites

Actually thinking about if that type of universe did exist I doubt any level of thinking could define its laws

If you want your "equation" to balance then there should be same entities on either side of the = sign. You can't balance an equation where you have meters on one side and apples on the other, hence units should be same, and then your negative volume can't exist.

##### Share on other sites

Maybe this will help me understand your reasoning. Help me answer this. If our universe exist with a positive amount of matter what balances with it?

Wave function is balanced,it has peaks and troughs about a point of equilibrium.

## Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

## Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

## Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×

• #### Activity

• Leaderboard
×
• Create New...

## Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.