z3rg Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 quantamagazine.org/20140827-quark-quartet-fuels-quantum-feud/“The thing you call the ‘quark’ might have quark-antiquark pairs and glue and all the rest built into it,” We have right handed neutrino vacuum. The vertical direction is the time dimension. The particles are contact area of the space-time bubbles. If we reverse the direction of spin of one blister, we get a virtual pair of quarks.One up and anti-up pair of particles. We can do spin up one of bubble, we will get D antiD quarks. or virtual electron- positron pair. And we can do lot of things with it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I am not sure that isn't a misquote in the original article - there are grave meta-physical problems with something x1 containing itself x2 and something else y; cos the itself ie x2 is either not identical or it contains x3 and y2 and so on for as long as you fancy continuing. If it isn't a misquote in the quanta article then it is so far out of context that the meaning has been lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 So, what predictions does this new model make, such that it could be tested? (part of the guidelines for posting here) Also, electrons are not made up of quarks. That's a whole other kettle of fish, and explanations that would be required — different interactions than quarks undergo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Here is a related article http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0407274 Haven't studied this theory yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z3rg Posted January 18, 2015 Author Share Posted January 18, 2015 (edited) Very important. You can not separate subquarks because the particles are contact points of two bubbles . As point of contact of two spherical.Do you see a point but there is nothing without the spheres or with one sphere. Secondly This model can describe how to become a fermion from quark case of beta decay. Edited January 18, 2015 by dochow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 Very important. You can not separate subquarks because the particles are contact points of two bubbles . As point of contact of two spherical.Do you see a point but there is nothing without the spheres or with one sphere. Secondly This model can describe how to become a fermion from quark case of beta decay. What predictions does this new model make, such that it could be tested? Also, quarks are already fermions. Beta decay doesn't change fermions into bosons, or vice-versa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now