Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About z3rg

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Favorite Area of Science
  1. Oke not matter. It is only a crackpot from who can not speak right in this language. Forget all.
  2. Backward causality is not classical solution. Nothing wrong with the Bell inequality Sorry I will not use windows again. But you have time friends and internet. Do some work for truth. You have one life.
  3. z3rg

    Diquark theory

    Very important. You can not separate subquarks because the particles are contact points of two bubbles . As point of contact of two spherical.Do you see a point but there is nothing without the spheres or with one sphere. Secondly This model can describe how to become a fermion from quark case of beta decay.
  4. First, it is a simple case Know you the equation when a photon passes through two polarizers? physics.wisc.edu/undergrads/courses/spring08/208/Lectures/lect21.pdf Malus Law: I1 = I0/2 I2= I1 cos2 (45º) = 0.5 cos2(p2-p1) optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/lukishova/QuantumOpticsLab/2013/OPT_253/GroupC_Lab1_Sam.pdf page 4: 1/2 cos2(beta- alpha) This is the same equation as the equation of entangled photons. Whereas one of the photons goes backwards in time. (presupposition)
  5. quantamagazine.org/20140827-quark-quartet-fuels-quantum-feud/ “The thing you call the ‘quark’ might have quark-antiquark pairs and glue and all the rest built into it,” We have right handed neutrino vacuum. The vertical direction is the time dimension. The particles are contact area of the space-time bubbles. If we reverse the direction of spin of one blister, we get a virtual pair of quarks.One up and anti-up pair of particles. We can do spin up one of bubble, we will get D antiD quarks. or virtual electron- positron pair. And we can do lot of things with it...
  6. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/22442-so-youve-got-a-new-theory/ "Math is precise and has a very high information density — it is very powerful. " You can read on this site. Well language of physics is math. There is the equation. and the result is good. And it is not really crackpot. www.youtube.com/watch?v=--BdgqH7pjI Alain Aspect Speaks on John Wheeler's Delayed Choice Experiment "Thus one decides the photon shall have come by one route or by both routes after it has already done its travel." "Within a naïve classical word view, quantum mechanics can even mimic an infl
  7. Some people believe that the small gap distance suggests some simple solutions. But they are wrong.
  8. You do not have to believe in it. This is just one option among many.
  9. z3rg

    What is gravity?

    Pushing gravity theory is kind of joke. Gravity rather like refraction of wave.
  10. An another way, where separation is big http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach%E2%80%93Zehnder_interferometer
  11. A double-slit quantum eraser http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0106078v1.pdf One possible solution:backward causality #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <math.h> #include <X11/Xlib.h> Display *dpy; Window win; GC gc; double radian=(180.0/M_PI); void pixel(int x,int y,int color) { XSetForeground(dpy,gc,color); XDrawPoint(dpy, win, gc, x,y); } void line(int x1,int y1,int x2,int y2,int color) { XSetForeground(dpy,gc,color); XDrawLine(dpy, win, gc, x1,y1,x2,y2); } double sqr(double n) // x^2 { return n
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.