Forward time

[swansont]

The laws of physics are taught and learned without understanding the fundamental reasons for every action that creates the possibility of defining actions into laws.

Since I am defining a new wave action, I am clarifying and elevating the old understandings. Excuse me if you have definations of laws that differ than the reality that I see.

It's incumbent on you to use proper terminology. You can't just use any old word just because it sounds neat. The resulting explanation will have no meaning.

[Nobrainer]

Let me start with this;

 

The mechanical mechanism of gravity

 

 

Gravity is the force of shear stress between waves emitted by all mass and energy.

 

Gravitation and dark energy are contact forces of shear stress and tension between two or more potential energy objects (mass and/or energy) via release of the gravitational wave as an extension of the objects. The process of generated waves colliding forming three dimensional wavefronts is the action and the reaction is gravity, bringing the objects (generating the waves) spacially close together into the center of the newly formed three dimensional wave.

 

Definitions;

 

In physics, a wavefront is the locus (a line, or, in a wave propagating in 3 dimensions, a surface) of points having the same phase.- http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavefront_(disambiguation)

 

In physics, a contact force is a force that acts at the point of contact between two objects,[1] in contrast to body forces. Contact forces are described by Newton's laws of motion, as with all other forces in dynamics.-http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contact_force

 

Tension- In physics, tension is the pulling force exerted by a string, cable, chain, or similar solid object on another object. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tension_(physics)

 

Shear-stress-

A shear stress, denoted (Greek: tau), is defined as the component of stress coplanar with a material cross section. Shear stress arises from the force vector component parallel to the cross section. Normal stress, on the other hand, arises from the force vector component perpendicular or antiparallel to the material cross section on which it acts.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shear_stress#section_3

Edited October 8, 2012 by Nobrainer

[imatfaal]

Quoted material link ? For The Einstein quotes?

I think one of these...

http://physics.bu.ed...terference.html

http://zonalandeduca...planation2.html

http://rescomp.stanf...teinQuotes.html

"In physics, interference is a phenomenon in which two waves superimpose to form a resultant wave of greater or lower amplitude. Interference usually refers to the interaction of waves that are correlated or coherent with each other, either because they come from the same source or because they have the same or nearly the same frequency. Interference effects can be observed with all types of waves, for example, light, radio, acoustic, and surface water waves."

http://en.m.wikipedi...ave_propagation)

http://www.sciencecl...rference.html#b

 

For the quote in the first part of post 69!

[Nobrainer]

For the quote in the first part of post 69!

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_(wave_propagation)

Again ....? why harp. I am stating that interference has reactions that influeince the process of interference itself... For example; distuptive wave interferences cancel each other out so we are left with constructive wave interference.. I understand why and how.... but current science leaves that blank. --- all me

 

There are real reasons why time and entropy are forward or increasing directions. There are real reasons why potential energy travels in the direction of kinetic energy. No one has answered these questions until now. The reason the universe's mass and energy, together, are expanding outward at increasing acceleration is the same reason time is a forward measure, is the same reason entropy increases, because mass and energy decay into a gravitational wave creating time, space, expansion as a function of wave emission and alignment, in conjunction with the waves created initially at the big bang.

Edited October 8, 2012 by Nobrainer

[ACG52]

I understand why and how.... but current science leaves that blank. --- all me

 

 

Another unsung genius. Thousands of highly educated, often brilliant physicists over the last hundred years have missed this, but Nobrainer, with no education, and no knowledge of physics, has managed to figure it out.

 

Riigghhtt.....

[Nobrainer]

You are wrong on all three accounts

 

It is common scientific knowledge that they did all miss it, or you would not be so sarcastic if you knew.

If you understand the nature of forward time, entropy increasing, and it is different than mine and it explains forward time let's here it. ....

or until I can understand that I am wrong I do think I understand. You know Einstein did say that Imagination is more important than knowledge. The reason he said that was because if you can not imagine the process then you can not correctly understand the laws of nature and why they work.

To repeat so you understand, here is what has been missed....

All mass and energy decay into gravitational waves creating the actions of time and space. These waves, initially created by the big bang align yet still attached to individual mass and energy create a reaction of aligning masses, this is gravity.

 

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

 

A missed opportunity occured in the 1600's when Christopher Huygens described the Huygens Principle because Christopher Huygen's decided that the back action to wavefront formation was negligable, it is not and he was wrong. Drop two ping pong balls 1/4 inch apart into still water and watch the reaction to wavefront formation.

 

A colossal missed opportunity occured in the late 1880's when Michelson and Morley could not find an external aether and with Einstein's help later, the world decided there is no medium necessary.

 

Now, without understanding dark matter moves mass by having gravity and dark energy accelerates the universe with out a known force.

 

 

Well it does suprise me more than anyone else, I should have read about how the universe works in 7th grade, then high school, then college, then post grad but no! I can not believe that it is not common knowledge. Instead people smarter than me pretend to believe in multiple dimensions greater than three. There are no more or less physical dimensions than 3. You cab not even physically show one or two dimensions, only symbolize them. The universe is built with three dimensions.

There are no more dimensions than three, and the only way that the universe can work in three dimensions is if the very fundamental nature of the universe is an action of a process and that process defines the parameters of space-time, entropy, forward time, relative time, C, dark matter. Black hole evaporation and gravitation. It explains why strong, weak and electromagnetic forces exist and are significantly weaker than gravitation.

 

If only one fundamental process of mass and energy decay into gravitational waves and these waves create wavefronts with reactions that cause gravity, just like the ping pong ball experiment shows... And that is just the beginning of the story.

 

 

So maybe you should think about what you think you know and focus your energies on why time is forward, space can be relative, the speed of light is constant relative to the movement of the source in relation to the observer. Contemplate dark energy, dark matter, gravity and see if you can tie them conceptually together as I have.

 

Here is a simple way gravity and dark energy relate. Take the ends of two strings on two balls of string and tie them together. Set the balls of string down and 10 feet apart with your two tied strings attached, walk away holding the strings with a constant velocity as you walk away. Watch the two actions as the strings unwind from the balls of strings. Action 1- the balls of string follow the two connected strings and although the strings are moving away at a constant velocity the masses(balls of string) move toward the two strings (wave/ wavefront) increasing their acceleration. This is the SIMPLIFIED action of dark energy, the second action is that the strings by forming this wavefront create an almost negligible force which brings the balls of string together. This is gravitation.

There is string theory, but this is closer to MOND, not quite but it is original human thought my human thought and if I was wrong I would not care to take this time. I have been more wrong than right in many aspects. I have learned to bet on only sure outcomes and over time, you will catch up and be a little patient with your own abilities and you may discover what I already have.... Original discovery is both overwhelming and there is an aura of disappointment because the search is over for me...

It is funny to watch the stumbling over it...

 

Usually the beginners say something like- so what makes you think you are right ? You think you are better than Rhe greatest minds ever to exist? I have had it all.. You are just average...Average is like vanilla, plain in your harassment attempt.

I an not a genius in the sense that I do not grasp rote memorization, I need to understand HOW THINGS WORK.

I need concrete answers, and I do not stop until I can deduce them. I just think about things longer and deeper than anyone else. How can time be different dependent upon relationships to density of mass? Or acceleration?

Start using those neurons and take the red freaking pill. Everything is connected in larger and larger invisible hidden variable ways. And here is the punch line... Hold it....

And I am showing you the ways.... So clichè. If you chose the blue pill, that is up to you...

 

 

PREDICTION

New law of conservation;

As space increases, total energy decreases.

The substance of the universe is composed of three forms of matter; space, mass and energy. Starting from the singularity and ending in all space.

Edited October 9, 2012 by Nobrainer

[swansont]

And thus we return in our circle to this point

So we're back to what I asked last week: How do you test this? What predictions does this model make?

 

This is required by rule #1 of Speculations, so if you continue to ignore it, the thread could/will be closed.

[Nobrainer]

Predictions other than the mechanism of dark energy and/ or dark matter have been stated and I will again. Why so rude?

Here we go again... Off the top of my head

All galaxies with flatten as outward from the middle.

In isolated systems overall total energy will always decrease. Total energy is not conserved under the present definition.

Wave synchronization can happen in empty space as radiation travels through it as though mass is present.

Kepler's laws will be commonly violated.

The force of Dark matter disappears in the presence of local mass.

The universe is flattening.

 

A new physics law- wave synchronization is the action and gravity is the force as a result of the reaction. This means that the formula for gravitational attraction should be identical to the reactive force of wavefront formation.

 

Galaxies can synchronize wave emission and revolve as through the entire galaxy is on a plate moving as it would a rotating plate.

 

Gravity decreases approaching Absolute zero.

Gravity increases in a stronger magnetic field as a measure of time dilation.

As space increases at a constant velocity the mass and energy in the universe decrease to the same extent and increase in acceleration as they are decreasing I'm total energy.

 

 

(note)

The nature of continuously generated monopole waves is constructive interference, to separate mass is to create a destructive interference and the increase in gravitation is the resistance to change in constructive interference.

 

So the natural law is for waves to align increasing in amplitudes, strengthening the wave.

 

Another unsung genius. Thousands of highly educated, often brilliant physicists over the last hundred years have missed this, but Nobrainer, with no education, and no knowledge of physics, has managed to figure it out.

 

Riigghhtt.....

 

I wonder where the moderator is now?

Let's say that I treat you the same--- without knowing I state that you have no education, no knowledge, you are as dumb as a rock when it comes to grasping even the most simple concepts like wavefront formation creates a reverse action. a rock has a bigger IQ than your education has helped you! Would that finally get their attention? It is a lopsided moderator modulating if you ask me.. This is a test.

[imatfaal]

!

Moderator Note

http://en.m.wikipedi...ave_propagation)
Again ....? why harp.

I harp on about it because it is plagiarism - and you show a deep lack of respect for the authors of the website that your have ripped text from without proper acknowledgement (and no it is not the above wikipage).

I wonder where the moderator is now?
Let's say that I treat you the same--- without knowing I state that you have no education, no knowledge, you are as dumb as a rock when it comes to grasping even the most simple concepts like wavefront formation creates a reverse action. a rock has a bigger IQ than your education has helped you! Would that finally get their attention? It is a lopsided moderator modulating if you ask me.. This is a test.

I failed my driving test, I failed the turing test, and I will probably fail this one.

You gave the following as testable predictions
All galaxies with flatten as outward from the middle.
In isolated systems overall total energy will always decrease. Total energy is not conserved under the present definition.
Wave synchronization can happen in empty space as radiation travels through it as though mass is present.
Kepler's laws will be commonly violated.
The force of Dark matter disappears in the presence of local mass.
The universe is flattening.

Even the first one strikes me as provably false - but nonetheless could you elucidate on how you would test these and crucially how your predictions (for an experiment that might be vaguely feasible in the not too distant future) would vary from those of standard academic physics. It would strike me that Kepler's laws - which are well known and the planets provide oodles of experimental data - would be an ideal start. Continued bluster, hand-waviness, and repetition will not be allowed.

[Nobrainer]

Initially you were correct, I used quotation marks but forgot to site Wikipedia so I corrected it and then ...

 

You Harped on me again AFTER I corrected my mistake not before.

Second, reread what you just wrote, you included your words with my words.

 

In addition, including your words with my words you added, testable predictions Vs predictions. I was asked what the predictions are not the testable predictions and I have done that before too.

So to recap, you put your words in white, not pink. I assume this was a mistake just like when I quoted and forget the reference but still had quotes. It is not plagerizing when it was quoted. It is the absence of a reference but not plagiarizing because of the quote. Unless you also are stating your concept of plagiarizing involves claiming by the white box that I wrote the words testable predictions.

 

Let me give you complete spectrum opposites to contemplate on testable predictions-

Kepler's laws, specifically the second law. In general Planets should orbit faster closer in and faster further out but under NO CURRENT UNDERSTANDING should they all have the same orbital time as if they are sitting on an old record player all moving to the speed of the record. That is an observable prediction. All forms of this violation are open too but this is an extreme example. It would give evidence of emitted and synchronizing waves from every object on that record player synchronizing with the center, star, black hole, etc.

A much simpler exercise to demonstrate the new law of generated wave action is the kickback of wave alignment or gravity. That is the ping pong dropping experiment which I have explained.

 

As Newton's laws work well in one reference frame and Einstein's General Relativity explains the interactions of moving reference frames my Ghost wave theory clarifies the actions of the expanding space between reference frames also creates a force both of dark energy and dark matter and it is being generated from all reference frames.

 

One process, decay of potential energy to it's least potential state, the continued release of the Gravitational wave, a monopole wave (one point of connection with mass and or energy) continuously released creating space. Originally released at the big bang but continuing to be released from each clump/quanta of mass/ energy. Gravity is a contact force between waves resulting in a stress- tension force created at the wavefront formation but traveling backward creating a force between the sources that are generating the waves. This force is gravity. The ping pong ball experiment shows the hidden action that is gravity. The violation's of Kepler's laws observably will show validity of this hidden variable, the Ghost Wave Theory.

Edited October 9, 2012 by Nobrainer

[swansont]

None of these are very specific, i.e. there is no way to quantify the effects, but let's see what we have.

 

Predictions other than the mechanism of dark energy and/ or dark matter have been stated and I will again. Why so rude?

Here we go again... Off the top of my head

All galaxies with flatten as outward from the middle.

It's not a prediction if standard physics already has it covered.

 

What of elliptical galaxies?

 

 

In isolated systems overall total energy will always decrease. Total energy is not conserved under the present definition.

Ever been observed?

 

Wave synchronization can happen in empty space as radiation travels through it as though mass is present.

Vague

 

Kepler's laws will be commonly violated.

Common! So not observing this at all would seem to be a problem.

 

Gravity decreases approaching Absolute zero.

So why isn't this observed in trapped atoms or Bose-Einstein condensates? Which have been used to measure effects of gravity, which is kinda hard to do if the gravity goes away. I routinely toss atoms that are around 1 or 2 microKelvins, and gravity works normally.

 

So this falsifies your "theory".

[Nobrainer]

None of these are very specific, i.e. there is no way to quantify the effects, but let's see what we have.

 

 

It's not a prediction if standard physics already has it covered.

 

What of elliptical galaxies?

 

 

 

Ever been observed?

 

 

Vague

 

 

Common! So not observing this at all would seem to be a problem.

 

 

So why isn't this observed in trapped atoms or Bose-Einstein condensates? Which have been used to measure effects of gravity, which is kinda hard to do if the gravity goes away. I routinely toss atoms that are around 1 or 2 microKelvins, and gravity works normally.

 

So this falsifies your "theory".

Let me correct myself- gravity would stop at absolute zero.

Gravitational wave emission is reason you can not get to absolute zero but I would think the Bose-Einstein condensates might show an effect under the correct circumstances, maybe hydrogen or helium only though. How do those to act I wonder?

 

 

So no it doesn't because the effects at that small degree change is the reason gravity to continues. Absolute zero is what you need and you can not get there because of this process. It is this process that prevents you from going to absolute zero... Ps -- that was a fun turn around and set up... Sorry...

Helium might be the correct candidate

At absolute zero gravity stops, before wavefront formation the effects are null.

 

I do not know how gravitational waves are emitted, I could be totally wrong with everything , but all the pieces seem to be able to fit.

Edited October 9, 2012 by Nobrainer

[Nobrainer]

It appears to me, God blinks.

 

The big bang to the big wave and maybe back again, could it be an eloquent and foundationally simple process.

Three forms of matter; mass, energy and space.

 

 

Space? Einstein said something like this, mass warps space-time and it is this warpage that causes gravity. Acceleration could slow down a persons time relative to where the acceleration started, wow. There is a catch, you never know your time slowed unless you compare to where you started from. And another catch, you actually do not live any longer than you would have because your own time can not be relative to itself. There is only one answer that makes mechanical sense. Time is a measure of change, of the motion of a process. This process can be influenced by a strong gravitational field a thicker aether in a sense. Why would an aether be thicker, stronger near a denser mass? If a three dimensional mass is giving off a radiating wave, isn't the waves strongest force at the point of generation? And it's strength changes how as it travels further away until another wave collides increasing the amplitude (dark matter).

 

I thought about it some more.

Would I be right in stating that I believe gravity decreases as you take energy away from a system until it approaches a baseline close but not equal to absolute zero. The reason that absolute zero cannot be attained is because of the fundamental property of mass naturally decaying into the gravitational wave. This is the reason from time moving forward to the absolute clock of potential energy. Since E= M x C (sq.) and energy is loss as you approach absolute Zero, then in a sense mass was lost and since mass was lost, or the equalivant so doesn't the connection between the loss of energy in a system also corresponds to the equalivant loss of mass. So of course when you remove mass, the effects of gravity changes.

[swansont]

Let me correct myself- gravity would stop at absolute zero.

That was a very different claim than saying it decreases as you approach zero. Since absolute zero can't be achieved, this is moot — it's a non-prediction. I'll just note that replacing a decaying function with a step function is very easy to do if you're just hand-waving, rather than having an actual model.

[Nobrainer]

And a decaying function whose parameters include as a result of the peocess of decay from particle to wave generate fundamental laws of time, space, gravity, dark matter, dark energy and explains rhe entire universe concesprually is so easy it should have been done in Einstein's time, but it wasn't.

It is interesting hand waving but unbelievably simple and eloquent as time remains constant in a forward direction it's balanced due to decreasing total energy and increasing acceleration.

It is mindboggling to visually understand the nature of Everything.

I do find it humorus that a physicists can pretend to not understand conceptually how when you take energy away from a system that influences the overall gravity of that system. It would violate even the current laws, conceptually. Measuring the change would take the spin of binary neutron stars except with possibly a supercooled consulate of hydrogen or helium, there is where you would get strange behavior allowing a supercooled group of atoms to act gravity independent possibly..

 

That was a very different claim than saying it decreases as you approach zero. Since absolute zero can't be achieved, this is moot — it's a non-prediction. I'll just note that replacing a decaying function with a step function is very easy to do if you're just hand-waving, rather than having an actual model.

It's not different. But it is the underlying reason for all actions that create a measurable temperature. I just did not express my self correctly, emailing on an iPhone in a hurry. Of course taking energy out of a system changed the systems gravitational strength, it is not a testable prediction because first it is expected under general relativity and it is very close to non measurable without interference. Their should be an Bose- Einstein exception; I will look for it;

Possibly a different type of superconductivity. Possibly weaker gravitation and restriction of collapsing electromagnetic fields, an ultra superconductor.

Edited October 10, 2012 by Nobrainer

[Ophiolite]

an ultra superconductor.

Is qualifying a defined absolute a good way to convince readers you know what you are talking about?

[Nobrainer]

Is qualifying a defined absolute a good way to convince readers you know what you are talking about?

Probably not, I have surprised myself and I am in a gray area here. But I think I have made a little headway.

I was trying to understand the implications of my Ghost wave theory with respect to Bose- Einstein condensate and I was told that the effects of gravity do not change as material is cooling. Obviously that is wrong even by today's understanding since you are taking away energy. It is not discernible with one atom but a supercooling like helium and hydrogen into a Bose- Einstein condensate should change inertia with respect to mass and it does. In addition Helium condensate has very unusual characteristics of acting almost like a liquid gas.

I believe this shows a discrepancy that by understanding gravitational waves are emitted and the effect of gravity as an emitted wave synchronizing and not a direct pulling force the distinction my become more apparent.

Remember, I am claiming that dark energy and dark matter are two aspects of gravitational wave emission and waves forming wavefronts process along with gravity. I am also claiming that it is this wave release that causes the actions of time and space. The big bang created the momopole wave but as wave synchronization brought the other forces into a mass arrangment and mass and energy consistently givesoff this wave, that is when time starts. Time did not start at the big bang but once hot energy cooled andstabolized. Extrapatomg the speed of light backwards from the furtherest galaxies should show where time started and thereby allow the laws of physics to include space itself as an action that obeys the laws.

 

"There is no single accepted theory that explains the source of inertia. Various efforts by notable physicists such as Ernst Mach (see Mach's principle), Albert Einstein, D Sciama, and Bernard Haisch have all run into significant criticisms from more recent theorists." (1)

(1)- http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertia

Edited October 10, 2012 by Nobrainer

[ACG52]

Remember, I am claiming that dark energy and dark matter are two aspects of gravitational wave emission and waves forming wavefronts process along with gravity

 

Why don't cranks ever realize that Dark Energy and Dark Matter are two completely seperate things, and the only thing they have in common is the word 'Dark"?

[Nobrainer]

Why don't cranks ever realize that Dark Energy and Dark Matter are two completely seperate things, and the only thing they have in common is the word 'Dark"?

And why don't total idiots read the relationship before they show the world how in the dark they are... In addition to the word "dark" meaning unknown mechanism you do not even know current mathmatical theories. The latest by the mathmatical team of Ma and Wang have added one field to general relativity and that field incorporates the actions of dark matter and energy. So do your research before you show who the "CRANK" is...

[swansont]

I strongly suspect that if you ever actually provided a link to the work of Ma and Wang, we would find that it has exceedingly little to do with what you are talking about, other than this one thing. IOW, there would be no overlap with mechanism and no actual support for your conjecture.

[Nobrainer]

Are you a split personality, who is the WE in your little gang?

I seriously doubt that if I placed a apple on a table you would give me any credit for placing an apple on a table. I can provide a link or if you were not lazy you would have looked it up already, duh??? You can't do that?

 

I am telling you again that gravity, considered a pulling force is actually a continuously generated wave synchronization from waves generated from different sources. As a result of this way to understand the nature of time, space and gravity, dark matter ( the extra missing mass that is required to hold galaxies together because the the rotational force of galaxies) and dark energy can be conceptually demonstrated with this original idea. One process allows everything to mechanically function in only three dimensions. This requires a correction factor in the way of understand a new field mathmatically. When fields align and influience both forward motion and reverse motion translated to a new stress/ tension field to represent the actions of dark matter and dark energy as wave alignments affecting the actions interpreted as dark matter. As a side note- there will never be an identified and confirmed particle associated with dark matter, only a field. This is a prediction is self-evident in the description of the two conditions of my theory, wave emission and alignment with a kickback to the source.

 

With that conceptual understanding it simply means general relativity is missing the other force of the process represented as a new field, a new set of gravitational field equations. If you need further evidense I suggest you look at Ma Wang (pun intended), it is too easy, LMAO. That was fun.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120906092059.htm

[Nobrainer]

It is this easy.

The framework of the theory of everything's fundamental description has to be able to answer what is time and what is the mexhanism in which pricesses move forward in time and not also backward in time. Looking around many things move forward in time. Aging, rusting, growing, erosion are all descriptions of a when something concept of time tells when something ages but there is an underlying process which explains the fundamentals.

Edited October 11, 2012 by Nobrainer

[Ophiolite]

Could you repeat the maths part, or direct me to the post where you express the fundamental - and easy - equations you are arguing for. I missed it somehow.

[swansont]

Are you a split personality, who is the WE in your little gang?

I seriously doubt that if I placed a apple on a table you would give me any credit for placing an apple on a table. I can provide a link or if you were not lazy you would have looked it up already, duh??? You can't do that?

Ma and Wang aren't exactly unique names ( a search on 'wang' gave more than 1000 hits on ArXiv), and you were remiss in not providing a link initially, as this is your claim — it's incumbent upon you to support it.

 

You haven't been around to mow my lawn, ever. I guess that makes you lazy, according to your stance.

 

I am telling you again that gravity, considered a pulling force is actually a continuously generated wave synchronization from waves generated from different sources. As a result of this way to understand the nature of time, space and gravity, dark matter ( the extra missing mass that is required to hold galaxies together because the the rotational force of galaxies) and dark energy can be conceptually demonstrated with this original idea. One process allows everything to mechanically function in only three dimensions. This requires a correction factor in the way of understand a new field mathmatically. When fields align and influience both forward motion and reverse motion translated to a new stress/ tension field to represent the actions of dark matter and dark energy as wave alignments affecting the actions interpreted as dark matter. As a side note- there will never be an identified and confirmed particle associated with dark matter, only a field. This is a prediction is self-evident in the description of the two conditions of my theory, wave emission and alignment with a kickback to the source.

 

With that conceptual understanding it simply means general relativity is missing the other force of the process represented as a new field, a new set of gravitational field equations. If you need further evidense I suggest you look at Ma Wang (pun intended), it is too easy, LMAO. That was fun.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120906092059.htm

That's a press release, not a paper, though at least they give the paper's title in the link. There's no mention of wave alignment, or of monopole or dipole waves in the paper. Imagine that.

[Nobrainer]

Ma and Wang aren't exactly unique names ( a search on 'wang' gave more than 1000 hits on ArXiv), and you were remiss in not providing a link initially, as this is your claim — it's incumbent upon you to support it.

 

You haven't been around to mow my lawn, ever. I guess that makes you lazy, according to your stance.

 

 

That's a press release, not a paper, though at least they give the paper's title in the link. There's no mention of wave alignment, or of monopole or dipole waves in the paper. Imagine that.

And that is why they call it an "original idea" . I never said their paper talked about dipoles or monopoles. And I supplied a link once asked.

My point is that another mathmatical field is needed that describes the actions of dark matter and dark energy, this field is described by Ma and Wang which will change the law of conservation of total energy to include the aether of space itself. Remember my criteria, right or wrong is;

 

1). All mass and energy decay into gravitational waves as a point of origin energy transfer with a constant speed, frequency and wavelength, this is the least potential form of energy.

2). A missed law in physics- an increase in wave amplitude is an action of a contact force which requires a reaction, the reaction is gravity.

 

Again, this is an original idea, not copied from Ma or Wang or anyone. I think about things a very long time. Remember, inflation to dark energy has to fit in order for things to be correct.

Funny, by complaining that my concept is not explained in their general relativity math is not a problem for me. We both state that the conservation of energy is violated and they include, mathematically, how dark energy and dark matter are aspects of a process that is also gravitation, in which I agree. What they do not do is explain the mechanism and that is what I do. So your assumptive attach about Ma and Wang not including dipoles and monopoles in the language is really a compliment because you are acknowledging, if I am correct, that my insight is off the charts unbelievable. It's not, I have an ability to conceptualize processes that many do not have. You see, there is one straight forward way to explain everything if only three dimensions exist and I believe I found it.

Edited October 11, 2012 by Nobrainer