Jump to content

Matter vs. Antimatter- particle destruction


MolecularMan14

Recommended Posts

Ok, I know this again, is not my field of expertise, however, I would very much like to know more about anti-matter.

Basically, I would like to know if there is anti-matter for every element? Since there is a Mg, is there and Anti-Mg, or an anti-plutonium, or an anti-gold?

When matter and anti-matter collide, does it release energy? Can the energy be harvested, or used practically?

Anything more to add would be helpful!

Thanks much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you could make an anti-element of anything really (I think only H has been made, though). And about the collision thing, yes, annihilation happens (both particles are converted to energy). And yes, it could be harvested, yet making anti-matter requires so much energy that it's useless to then turn it into energy. If there was a natural source of it, anti-matter would be a tremendous energy source. I personally can't see any use for it except a) having much energy in a small package, for example using anti-matter engines in spacecraft (if you turned a mass of 1kg into energy, you could drive a car with that energy for over 100 000 years) or b) using it as weaponry, which would of course be a terrible misuse of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are doing this at the Cern Switzerland Particle Acellerator. They have an excellent web site at http://Http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/

 

aguy2

 

"There is a relatively high probability that we and the universe around us are involved in an ongoing, staged process of self-creation; wherein and whereby the creator of us and the universe around us is attempting to create itself."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmm...what about isotopes like tridium? would those be affected by the anti-hydrogen?

 

Why wouldn't they? Tritium, like EVERY atom in existance, is made up of the same basic particles; neutrons, protons, and electrons. (Well, protium only contains protons and electrons, but that's nitpicking. :P ) So anti-matter would not care what it is that it's destroying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm...

The controlled production of antihydrogen observed in ATHENA is a great technological and scientific event. Even more so because ATHENA has produced antihydrogen in unexpectedly abundant quantities.

Where exactly do you hold these unexpectedly abundant quantities... and what do you do with them when you're done examining them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PET scans use the whole antimatter thing to make scans of your brain and other things. It uses an isotope of Fluorine that decays to give off a positron that is so attracted to electrons that it collides almost immediately upon creation. This gives off two photons in opposite directions, to conserve momentum. These are back traced to give a 3D type scan. Positron is a positively charged electron, in essence. And anti-proton is a negatively charged proton, essentially. But there can't be an anti-neutron, due to the fact that it has no charge. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last i checked a neutron consisted of an electron and a proton, so i would imagine that a positron and negatively charged proton united as if like a neutron would be an anti-neutron

 

I assume that you get this from the fact that a neutron can emit an electron and thereby transmute into a proton, beta decay. But a proton can emit a positron(like the fluorine isotope) and become a neutron. Does this make a proton a neutron and a positron? That would mean it was really a proton and an electron and a positron. No, these bosons are actually made of quarks. In fact a proton is 2 up and a down while a neutron is 2 down and an up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"PET scans use the whole antimatter thing to make scans of your brain and other things. It uses an isotope of Fluorine that decays to give off a positron that is so attracted to electrons that it collides almost immediately upon creation. This gives off two photons in opposite directions, to conserve momentum. These are back traced to give a 3D type scan."

 

Yeah, my dad used to do that stuff. :P I think he said they used carbon-10 mostly. The isotope depends greatly on where the medicine they're testing goes, though. Carbon is used a lot since most medicines have carbon in them, which can be replaced by a carbon-10.

 

And about the beta- and beta+, they also emit anti-neutrinos and neutrinos respectively, for those who didn't know. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last i checked a neutron consisted of an electron and a proton

 

Whatever you checked was wrong.

 

A proton is made up of three quarks, uud (two "up" quarks and one "down")

A neutron is udd

 

A neutron can decay into a proton (d->u quark), but the opposite can happen as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.