Man-made nuclear bomb: ONE best evidence of Big Bang

[jsaldea12]

Man-made nuclear bomb: ONE best evidence of Big Bang.

 

(In 1964, radio astronomers Amo Penzias and Robert Wilson detected cosmic microwave background radiation covering entire outer space, believed remnant of Big Bang, below another d iscovery appears exceptionally good)

.

Atom is 99.999999999999% space., meaning its components, re-electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, are all that spacious. If atom is the size of 20 basketballs rolled into one, the size of its nucleus is like a grain of sand, and if the size of the nucleus is 20 basketballs rolled into one, the size of the innermost quark is like a grain of sand. From such hollow nucleus, particularly, its innermost hollow quarks, originates the mind-boggling nuclear bomb explosion, unbelievable several million times greater than conventional bomb. Such nuclear bomb release uncannily is similar to the first and biggest nuclear explosion of all time, the Big Bang. Big Bang originated from incredible proton-size ( roughly, size 10-18 meters or miles?, but, naturally, no one knows) that exploded into the biggest nuclear explosion of all time and made up the whole universe, re- the stars, planets, galaxies. Two formidable evidences support Big Bang , re-. the detected CMBR or comic microwave background radiation all over outer space, and the red-shifting of all galaxies, indicating expansion of the universe.. There is now another evidence, right here on earth, before our very eyes . The man-made nuclear bomb explosion, fusion or fission, is uncanny a likeness, a reminder, of the mother Big Bang.. Where does such unconceivable point mass of nucleus (.mass of .000000000001%, more or less, of total area of nucleus) get its mind-boggling energy release? Nuclear release is E=MC2 but how and why such incredible micro-micro point mass of nucleus (pre-Designed) account for massive destructions unless it is like Big Bang.. As a matter of fact, all nuclear explosions/generations, re- supernova explosion, meteor nuclear collision, nuclear generating plant, nuclear generated sun, stars, all nuclears inherent of Big Bang, in keeping with law of conservation that nothing is lost nor destroyed.

 

From proton-sized mass, Big Bang incredibly exploded and made up the total matters of the universe, such Big Bang expanded by itself, inflating by itself, infinitely, yet nothing added, nothing reduced, than its original proton-size... Like Big Bang, from a 99.999999999999% vacuum atom, a modern nuclear bomb, with gross weight of a THOUSAND kilograms can produce a mind-boggling BILLION kilograms of conventional explosive, the nuclear release expands by itself, inflates by itself, unlimitedly, nothing added, nothing reduced, than its net weight.. Man-made nuclear bomb is the best evidence that nuclear Big Bang did occur... .

 

Why man-made nuclear bomb is best evidence?: As we see, before our very eyes, how man-made nuclear bomb is, before and after explosion, …. we are seeing, too,, the making of nuclear Big Bang, before and after.

 

Jose s. Aldea

Chairman – Capiz Scientists & Inventors Society

 

Philippine Copyright 2009

By: jose s. aldea

 

Cc: DOST, CSIS

 

6.26.09

[mooeypoo]

Do you intend on sticking around and answering questions or are you just here to post random threads and run off? If it's the latter, I recommend you read our rules and perhaps save everyone some time.

[jsaldea12]

That is a very honest article. If you have some doubt, please let me know. Regards.

 

jsaldea12

 

6.27.09

[insane_alien]

a nuclear bomb and the big bang are hardly comparable.

 

a more apt analogy would be the inflation of a balloon than an explosive.

 

this is a common misconception which mass media doesn't help that the big bang was what we'd recognise as an explosion. it wasn't. not even close.

 

 

you see it wasn't the particles flying away from each other into preexisting space but the space itself expanding. like if you covered the balloon in dots, from the dots perspective all the other dots are moving away but that dot is stationary but infact all the dots are stationary its just the balloon between them is stretching.

[jsaldea12]

Reiterating, Big Bang was nuclear explosion, not inflation. How can you explain the presence of fission andfusion at the present, if both were none during Big bang> the fact that both are here implicates both are inherited from Big Bang. All that are present today havetheir origin, the mother Big Bang. This is inkeeping with law of conservation that nothing is lost nor destroyed, they just change form but basically, the same ingredient.

 

Inflation? Big bang was not inflation, making no noise, like a balloon. Here is a clinger: how can you explain the presence of CMBR. blackbody radiation, in all outer space. this evidence that it was the biggest nuclear explosion that scattered the galaxies all over the outer space.

 

 

 

jsaldea12

 

6.30.09

[iNow]

You do know, right, that simply repeating an invalid assertion doesn't suddenly make it valid?

[D H]

You do know, right, that simply repeating an invalid assertion doesn't suddenly make it valid?

He apparently has not learned that tidbit yet.

[jsaldea12]

But permit to repeat because I want an answer:

 

Do you believe that inflation? of Big Bang can cause CMBR in outer space, that blackbody radiation, evidenced of nuclear explosion.?

 

Now, what causes Big Bang?

 

Regards.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

6.30.09

[mooeypoo]

But permit to repeat because I want an answer:

 

Do you believe that inflation? of Big Bang can cause CMBR in outer space

Sure.

http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_cmb.html

http://cmb.physics.wisc.edu/tutorial/bigbang.html

 

, that blackbody radiation, evidenced of nuclear explosion.?

huh? You're making no sense.

 

Now, what causes Big Bang?

As far as I know, we don't know. That doesn't mean a nuclear bomb did it..

[iNow]

As far as I know, we don't know. That doesn't mean a nuclear bomb did it..

 

Oppenheimer's doppleganger in bizzaro world: Now I am become life, the creator of worlds.

[jsaldea12]

Nothing is lost nor destroyed, law of conservation, thus, we now have fission and fusion nuclear bombs/generations..

 

 

Blackbody radiation is evidenced of explosion, not inflation.

 

Regards.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

 

6.30.09

[insane_alien]

saying it over and over again doesn't make it true.

[GutZ]

Don't you need particles to make a nuclear bomb....doesn't particle generation require a certain temperature and perimeters in order to make a stable particle?

 

If this is true how can the big bang be a nuclear explosion without....particles....

 

Did energy just decide at one point " F&$# it! I hate myself I am going to run in all directions as fast as possible for no reason what so ever!"

 

I am getting this right? An explosion comes from the repulsion of "something"

[swansont]

 

If this is true how can the big bang be a nuclear explosion without....particles....

 

 

 

It's not. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, unless he presents a falsifiable hypothesis with evidence to back it up.

[jsaldea12]

Hi. Inflation like a balloon involves no sound,... only explosion, nuclear explosion makes sound and blackbody radiation.and throwing of particles all over that eventually became galaxies, stars, planets. Inflation is orderly, uniformly, and if it is inflation, all the galaxies should have been on the edges of inflated balloon..but all galaxies now scattered, though moving outward.

 

Big Bang was the biggest nuclear explosion..and we are the residue.

 

 

Regards.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

7.1.09

[mooeypoo]

Hi. Inflation like a balloon involves no sound,...

.....??

 

First off, inflation of a balloon DOES make a sound. Go inflate a few balloons and see for yourself that the stretching rubber makes quite an audible sound.

 

Second, there's no sound in space, because sound requires a medium to travel through, like air. There's no air in space.

 

Third, what the heck are you blabbering about and how does that even relate to anything you've said before or anything we've asked you to clarify? Are you even reading what we write to you?

 

only explosion

Explosion is different than expansion, and not just by its sound.

Did you even study physics at all? Like.. elementary physics? The type that explains the difference between explosion and expansion? Doesn't sound like it, in space or on earth.

 

, nuclear explosion makes sound and blackbody radiation.

I think you should go over the definition of "Black Body Radiation" again.

http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/black_body_radiation.html

 

And about what a nuclear explosion is and isn't, and what it produces (and doesn't).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_nuclear_explosions

http://www.fas.org/nuke/intro/nuke/effects.htm

 

and throwing of particles all over that eventually became galaxies, stars, planets.

Nice fantasy. You should publish your own fiction stories, at least you'll get some recognition from science-illiterate 12 year olds. Unless, of course, you want to change the face of physics, in which case, I would recommend you go read the definition of "MATHEMATICS" and then supply some.

 

Inflation is orderly, uniformly, and if it is inflation, all the galaxies should have been on the edges of inflated balloon..but all galaxies now scattered, though moving outward. [./quote]

No, they shouldn't have, the comparison to a balloon is lacking. It's used on laymen to make a no-brainer easy-to-comprehend analogy, but it's not an accurate representation.

 

A better representation would be a raisinbread doe rising. The raisins float away from one another as it rises, expands and inflates. The raisins aren't just in the edges, they're inside the doe. It works. It's also (guess what!) supported by (shriek!!) mathematics, which also serves (no! really?) to predict its effects.

 

Prediction is power. Can you predict? Show the math.

 

Big Bang was the biggest nuclear explosion..and we are the residue.

Wonderfully written bunch of googligook.

Let me reiterate this term, I think you might have missed it, and perhaps you do well by looking it up in the dictionary (along with some basic physics books to read):

Mathematics.

Learn some, supply some, otherwise your hypothesis will forever remain in the realm of a mediocre science fiction idea.

 

Supply some math and predictions, or stop wasting our time.

~moo

[jsaldea12]

Prediction? Nothing of that sorts. But again, the unquestionable scientific unerring law of conservation which states nothing is lost nor destroyed which argument and questioning cannot shake:

 

(a) Where does the nuclear fission and fusion come from if not from the source, the Big

Bang. All the nuclear that we see are reminders/imitations from the original Big

Bang. The nuclear today did not just appear from nothing, law of conservation.form

changes but basically the same..

(b) The blackbody radiations is strongest evidence that Big Bang was the biggest

explosion, Inflation, like bread expanding, can never do that.

 

Regards.

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

 

7.1.09

[mooeypoo]

Prediction? Nothing of that sorts.

Then:

 

1. It's not science.
   
2. We have no reason to replace the current theory (that does have predictions, quite accurate ones) with a messily written idea that has no math and no predictions.
   

But again, the unquestionable scientific unerring law of conservation which states nothing is lost nor destroyed which argument and questioning cannot shake:

You just looooove inventing laws, don't you.

 

(a) Where does the nuclear fission and fusion come from if not from the source, the Big Bang. All the nuclear that we see are reminders/imitations from the original Big

Bang. The nuclear today did not just appear from nothing, law of conservation.form changes but basically the same..

Wordsalad. Makes absolutely no sense. For one, that law does not exist to everything. There's a law of conservation of energy, but that doesn't mean there's conservation of everything. Second, your sentence structure makes no sense. I have no idea what you're saying.

 

(b) The blackbody radiations is strongest evidence that Big Bang was the biggest explosion, Inflation, like bread expanding, can never do that.

WHAT blackbody radiation? Where?

 

Evidence, man. EVIDENCE!

[jsaldea12]

The CMBR blackbody radiation. Even up to now, there is detected faint hizzing sound with faint glow all over outer space. Does inflation make hizzing sound or faint glow? Please answer.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

 

7.1.09

[mooeypoo]

The CMBR blackbody radiation. Even up to now, there is detected faint hizzing sound with faint glow all over outer space. Does inflation make hizzing sound or faint glow? Please answer.

Sound, who knows, there's no sound in space, and it's absolutely irrelevant.

 

Glow? Yes, absolutely.

 

Specially since the CMBR glow is on the radio frequency, not just visible to the naked eye.

 

So, for the fifth time, jsaldea12, it is NOT EXACTLY like a balloon.

 

Maybe not the inflation of a balloon, but as we pointed out many times, the comparison to a balloon is very simplistic and only works until a certain point.

 

The CMBR is well explained by the Big Bang model – when the universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was smaller, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from its white-hot fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and the radiation filling it grew cooler. When the universe cooled enough, stable atoms could form. These atoms could no longer absorb the thermal radiation, and the universe became transparent instead of being an opaque fog. The photons that were around at that time have been propagating ever since, though growing fainter and less energetic, since the exact same photons fill a larger and larger universe. This is the source for the term relic radiation, another name for the CMBR.

( source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation )

 

It's a good article to start with, and the accompanying resources are excellent as well.

 

I suggest you read some of it, it might help you understand how inflation could cause the CMBR.

 

~moo

 

P.S: "CMBR" is the "Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation", so it already has 'radiation' in it, and saying "CMBR Radiation" or "CMBR blackbody radiation" is just redundant. Plus, Blackbody radiation isn't precisely the same thing.

[swansont]

This passed ridiculous about three stops back. jsaldea12, you have been told several times that this is a scientific discussion board, and so discussions have to contain science. Argument by repeated claim does not qualify.

 

You had your chance. Thread closed.