Jump to content

E=mc^2


NowThatWeKnow

Recommended Posts

it's the energy that would be released in a matter to energy conversion. if %100 efficient and everything goes well.

the energy needed to accelerate something is it's mass times the acceleration


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

check out this thread for a tour of different conversions

http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=37601

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the energy needed to accelerate something is it's mass times the acceleration

 

That's the force necessary to cause an object to accelerate at a given rate. 'The energy required to accelerate something' is also misleading. The energy required to accelerate something up to a given velocity [math]v[/math] is [math]\frac{1}{2}mv^2[/math], or the energy required to move an object a distance [math]d[/math] while accelerating at a rate [math]a[/math] is [math]ma\cdot d[/math].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It means that mass is another kind of energy. However, the energy is hard to be released. This is the basic principle for fission and fusion reaction. There is a mass difference between the reactants and the products. Then huge amount of energy is released. The problem is that we have to provide large amount of energy to excite the reaction. Also once the reaction occurs, ie exploses and the reaction rate is hard to control. That is the reason why they are used as bombs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the matter can be converted into any kind of energy.

 

think about what energy is on a fundamental level, its either kinetic or potential, there is no energy particle.

 

in the case where your converting some mass into energy most of the time (all of the time?) the energy goes into the kinetic energy of the products.

 

for instance in fission the energy goes into the kinetic energy of all of the products, fission fragments, gamma rays, and neutrons.

 

 

hmm, swansont by any chance do you know if there is a situation where the energy released by the conversion of mass would go directly to potential energy?

 

I could think that there is a reaction where a particle decays into two lighter particles which are mutually attracted to each other, however I'm not sure if such a thing exists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well it depends a bit on how you construct your instrument which converts it so.

 

(but generally speaking , the resultant energy from such a conversion, artificial or natural, is electromagnetic energy). (light, heat, gamma rays, etc etc... but also some other particles)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.