The main idea of new theory of time-space is that time is a expression of change in motion distance and curvature. In a word, time is equivalent to space, and vice versa.

 

According this new theory of time-space, there are three kinds of clock. Those are current clock, thing clock and Doppler clock. Every clock has its own second unit.

 

Time-space is moving.

 

Active and passive motion of time-space form a whole world of physics.

 

The new theory gives us a definite answer to what the nature of wave, light,gravity,energy,passive inertia, active inertia, electricity, magnetism, special and general Doppler principle is.

 

Reference:THING AND ITS LAW (ISBN 1-58939-525-5), chapter 2: timedistance and timecurvature (the active and passive motion of time-space) and chapter 5: natural force(the durality of time-space and energy)published by Virtualbookworm.com publishing Inc.

We don't like duplicate threads.

 

Please read the forum rules.

According to the new theory of space and time, purple headphone wearing cows make time pass by mooing.

 

Just because something says its so doesn't make it so. Evidence evidence evidence...

Thing clock sounds a bit weak.

424319 said in post # :

Reference:THING AND ITS LAW (ISBN 1-58939-525-5), chapter 2: timedistance and timecurvature (the active and passive motion of time-space) and chapter 5: natural force(the durality of time-space and energy)published by Virtualbookworm.com publishing Inc.

 

SFA make my skin crawl but I don't know why. Pretentious, I suppose.

For what it's worth, Virtualbookworm.com is a print-on-demand publisher. It does both fiction and non-fiction; one of my friends published her novel through them. The author pays to have the book published (which is how the publisher makes money, not by actually selling books). I strongly doubt that the publisher was able to provide any sort of scientific peer review for this book.

For what it's worth, Virtualbookworm.com is a print-on-demand publisher. It does both fiction and non-fiction; one of my friends published her novel through them. The author pays to have the book published (which is how the publisher makes money, not by actually selling books). I strongly doubt that the publisher was able to provide any sort of scientific peer review for this book.

 

Which is why saying that "X has written N books on the topic of Y" gives a false sense of authority and expertise about X. Anybody, in principle, can write a book.

How about you do?

How about you do?

 

 

How about I do what? Write a book? I choose not to write a piece of scientific crap, just to prove the point, as I have some professional credibility to protect. I have a non-technical book registered with the US copyright office, so I know exactly how high that hurdle is.

No, reply #8 was a response to bobg@y, whose puerile trolling has since been deleted.

No, reply #8 was a response to bobg@y, whose puerile trolling has since been deleted.

 

Ah, of course.