JohnF Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 Well it does if you are talking billions Ridiculous isn't it how One Billion minus One Billion can equal 0.999 Billion, but it's true. How did we end up in such a situation? In fact I think both long and short formats are wrong and they shouldn't have a new name until the current one needs to be used again. So a hundred hundred is a thousand, a thousand thousand is a million, a million million is a billion, a billion billion is a trillion and so on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callipygous Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 Well it does if you are talking billions Ridiculous isn't it how One Billion minus One Billion can equal 0.999 Billion, but it's true. um... no, its not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 What he was talking about is 1 billion (eu) - 1 billion (us) = 0.999 billion (eu). More plainly: [math] 1\cdot 10^{12} - 1\cdot 10^9 = 0.999 \cdot 10^{12}[/math]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales I didn't know this. /me adds it to a very, very long list of things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dak Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 hmm... britain does not use the british billion. I did not know that. i thought we used 1million million as being a billion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales I didn't know this. /me adds it to a very, very long list of things That is one of the most interesting things I've heard today. I used to take french, and I always wondered why they called larger numbers by incorrect names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callipygous Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 this is the sort of thing that makes me ashamed of our species. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dak Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 the fact that different countries use different counting systems? or the fact that people find it interesting? anyway, one million means one thousand in either latin or greek, which is what the english word was based on. I used to take french, and I always wondered why they called larger numbers by incorrect names. i can't get over the fact that they count in base 20. why would they do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 Why do you spell 17 as "seventeen" instead of "ten-seven" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dak Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 hmm... i never thought of that. why do you guys say five-and-twenty instead of 25? why is every country daft with reguards to numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callipygous Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 the fact that different countries use different counting systems? yes. the fact that in a modern world i can say "one billion" to someone and they could be thinking "1,000,000,000,000" while im thinking "1,000,000,000". i can almost understand having different electrical systems, or currancy, or infrastructure, but all the way down to the most basic math? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dak Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 i wouldn't really hold it against, say, the french or germans for differing from english. but it is somewhat odd that american english and british english are different in such a confusing way. still, it's also somewhat odd that i could say 'pants' to you and you'd think 'trousers', whilst i'd think 'underpants'. not really species-loathing-inducing, imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnF Posted April 13, 2007 Author Share Posted April 13, 2007 i wouldn't really hold it against, say, the french or germans for differing from english. but it is somewhat odd that american english and british english are different in such a confusing way. still, it's also somewhat odd that i could say 'pants' to you and you'd think 'trousers', whilst i'd think 'underpants'. not really species-loathing-inducing, imo I think an embarrassing problem some British people face is asking for a cigarette in the US. In Britain a cigarette is quite often called a fag We are slowly converging the British version of English with the US version. Perhaps if we renamed it from English more people would take it up as their preferred language. I would like to see the US put the 'u' back in color though. Any suggestions for a new name for English? I vote for Earthlish or more seriously, Terran Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 @Dak: My point was that the english counting system also has a hidden affinity to 20 since the names of the number 13-19 are constructed differently than those above (nineteen vs. sixty-eight). why do you guys [supposedly meaning the germans] say five-and-twenty instead of 25? No one really knows. In fact, there was the idea to officially allow the twenty-and-five version as correct some years ago, hoping it would ease learning of the numbers for children and avoid typical typos (writing five-and-twenty as 52 instead of 25 is a very common mistake when you don´t pay attention). As with all things where people don´t want to learn something new, reason stood no chance against lazyness, so the idea was quickly dropped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dak Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 I think an embarrassing problem some British people face is asking for a cigarette in the US. In Britain a cigarette is quite often called a fag heh. i still remember proclaiming that i was 'going outside for a fag' in the US @Dak: My point was that the english counting system also has a hidden affinity to 20 since the names of the number 13-19 are constructed differently than those above (nineteen vs. sixty-eight). hmm... good point. I'm still curious as to why you know quite a bit of maths? do you know if there's any actual superiority of base-10 over other bases (like base-20)? I kinda allways assumed there's a reason we use base-10... this is why i love different countries... they really show-up your assumptions about the most basic things. No one really knows. In fact, there was the idea to officially allow the twenty-and-five version as correct some years ago, hoping it would ease learning of the numbers for children and avoid typical typos (writing five-and-twenty as 52 instead of 25 is a very common mistake when you don´t pay attention). hmm... well, i know that in england we used to count similarly. "five-and-twenty blackbirds, baked in a pie" and so on. even untill quite recently: my nan always used to say 'five-and-twenty to twelve', for example. As with all things where people don´t want to learn something new, reason stood no chance against lazyness, so the idea was quickly dropped. that's odd... i don't really know enough about german to tell for shure, but your recent spelling changes seemed rather... unuseful, tbh. kinda like worsenings, rather than inprovements. seems strange that the number reform wouldn't go through but the spelling one did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnF Posted April 13, 2007 Author Share Posted April 13, 2007 Could the counting to 20 be based on English currency? There were 20 shillings to the pound until 1971. With 12 pennies to the shilling that would also give a reason for starting the teens at ten three. The French have unique names for numbers up to 16 then they adopt a logical approach from there, ten seven, ten eight, ten nine but in French. Maybe that is related to weight or some other frequently used system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GutZ Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 Why do you spell 17 as "seventeen" instead of "ten-seven" ? Well I find Twelve and Eleven odder The dutch have it wierd too.. Tien, Elf, Twaalf, Dertien, Veertien, Vijftien, Zestien, Zeventien, Achttien, Negentien, Twintig, Eenentwintig Ten, Eleven, Twelve, ?, Four-ten, Five-ten, Six-ten, Seven-ten, Eight-ten, Nine-ten, Twenty, One and Twenty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dak Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 the dutch looks like a mixture of english and german... weird. as for eleven and twelve; after my question to atheist about base-10, i looked it up on the internet; apparently, base-12 has much going for it. no idea if this contributed to unique numbers up to 12? maybe the germanic countries used to use a base 12 counting system? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holly_2009 Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 iseriously didnt know that differnt contries were so differnt in their numbers and i never thpought about 13-19 i guess it wasnt ever that important to me... oh well i still dont get why england uses base-20?!?! i mean it just seems silly to me that they wouldnt use the first number in the tens place... but life goes on we will all get over it or atlast most of it but i am glad to know now that one billion - one billion doesnt always equal 0 (im going to trick some people at school on monday about that lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GutZ Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 the dutch looks like a mixture of english and german... weird. as for eleven and twelve; after my question to atheist about base-10, i looked it up on the internet; apparently, base-12 has much going for it. no idea if this contributed to unique numbers up to 12? maybe the germanic countries used to use a base 12 counting system? That would make sense. It's oddly mixed up...I guess really any bases is kinda arbitrary, Depending on if you modify the system and you have pre-existing systems working off it, but that like a given. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now