I’m referring to the link to the link to the scientific paper that said that evolution would take years longer than the age of the universe.

I am saying we would not be here if it took that long.

21 hours ago, Trurl said:

Do not be deterred if the first link’s paper is trying to say there is not enough time for different species to evolve.

I am no biologist but I say these changes in the DNA would make better sense if they occurred instantly. To me this is where the patterns would come from. Billions of variations would be worthless if it took millions of years to change.

But I think this is where patterns come in. You wouldn’t have to change every combination to make changes.

The billions of variations just make us unique. We may be similar but in our AES encryption brute force is needed to describe us. We may have genes that change rapidly but our ability to describe them is why the article describes brute force.

The first link is saying it’s a dead/bad link, but Answers in Genesis is a creationism organization and not a credible source. In any event you should quote the salient points of a link.

In evolution DNA changes happen from generation to generation; they need to be inherited. If you have a DNA change that isn’t passed along, that mutation dies with the organism.

You simply must make en effort to understand the basic science if you hope to comment on it.