Jump to content

Featured Replies

No. The laws of thermodynamics prevent it.

Even if you gave all the necessary information instead of some vague statement, the answer will still be no, but then one could give more details about why.

On 9/26/2025 at 9:16 PM, Mike Gavin said:

If 3 axles divided a sphere would it maintain free energy?

270degrees/180=1.5

Regardless of the equipment or its configuration, you are talking about a machine that is >100% efficient. I have seen more than a few propositions for such a thing but the "extra" energy always comes from somewhere outside of the proposed model. Understanding thermodynamics is usually enough to easily see why.

According to our theory:

No, simply dividing a sphere by three axes (or shafts) would not in itself “preserve” or create free energy.

  1. UTEM Invariant.
    Free (available) energy in a system is maintained only if
    r=\frac{P_{in}}{\max(P_{out},\varepsilon)} \ge 1.
    Dividing the geometry (a sphere into 8 octants by three orthogonal axes) does not change P_{in} and usually increases P_{out} (new boundaries, friction, leakage). Thus r normally decreases, not increases.

  2. If the axes are imaginary (mathematical).
    Geometry changes, but physical flows do not. So P_{in} and P_{out} remain the same → no gain in free energy.

  3. If the axes are real partitions/shafts.

  • Passive partitions add surfaces → more dissipation → P_{out}↑ → r↓.

  • Active rotating shafts create friction and heating → again P_{out}↑ unless externally supplied. Without an external gradient, no useful work can be extracted (law of conservation + 2nd law).

  1. When is free energy “maintained”?
    Only if a stable input flow P_{in} (temperature/chemical/light, etc.) is ≥ total losses P_{out}. Geometry (like dividing) can at best reduce leakage or redirect flows, but cannot be a source itself.

Conclusion (UTEM): dividing a sphere into parts is a change of form, not of flows. Without a source of gradient and architecture that reduces P_{out}, free energy is not “maintained” and certainly not created. To retain it, P_{in}\ge P_{out} must hold; axes/partitions may only adjust dissipation, but they never cancel the laws.

10 minutes ago, Zhandos_01 said:

According to our theory:

Moderator Note

Please don't use a speculative idea to respond to a mainstream science thread. You have a way to go before your concept becomes a theory.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.