Guest cansouth Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 A hacker sends not normal and illegal signals from satellites. People over the whole world blink with their eyes more then normal. You can study this on TV (Bloomberg, BBC, CNN or other TV-channels). It is very easy to see. Maybe it is less visible, but men have less soft movements then normal. This is also because of illegal and dangerous signals from satellites into the brains of human beings. It is very easy to see the increased eye blinking on people on television. Also the less soft movements on people (especially men) are very easy to observe and register. If you want to, or have to, you can compare old record/tapes of television or films vs. todays television and new films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maioux Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Hmmmmm..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Kovich Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Maybe its lights in their eyes which cause them to blink more...... Basically your unsupported hypothesis is that people on TV blink more because of hackers..... Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tree Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 If you can actually present some genuine numbers that compare the mean number of blinks per minute per person on equilivent shows then refute all these explinations then you might be on to something. As cameras work on a higer framerate, they catch more blinks. As more "real people" wind up on telly they are more self consious than proffesionals and thus blink more. As recording equiptment is more durable, there is less of an obsesion about cleanliness in the studio so more dust: more blinking.Outdoor recordings have also become more commonplace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPL.Luke Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 also they can't really call in sick at all, its possib le that alot of them are sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Never interrupt me while I'm adjusting my tin foil hat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Tycho?] Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I love incoherent posts about rediculous things, it goes so well in science forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Demosthenes- Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Also the less soft movements on people (especially men) are very easy to observe and register. What are soft movements... what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 OMFG!!! Finally somenody else who noticed this. I knew from the moment I saw George Bush blink during his State of the Union address that hackers were breaking into the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 also they can't really call in sick at all, its possib le that alot of them are sick.Please elaborate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Kovich Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 I hope your joking..... Just because George Bush blinked does not mean that hackers are controlling satellites. OMFG!!! Finally somebody else who noticed this. I knew from the moment I saw George Bush blink during his State of the Union address that hackers were breaking into the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 no shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cansouth Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 If you can actually present some genuine numbers that compare the mean number of blinks per minute per person on equilivent shows then refute all these explinations then you might be on to something. Hi. No, I dont have any statistically evidence. But its quite easy to watch it on television. I hoped some of you could observe it by yourself. It IS a hacker who makes it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 If you have no evidence, there is really no point in posting this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 Hi.No' date=' I dont have any statistically evidence. But its quite easy to watch it on television. I hoped some of you could observe it by yourself. It IS a hacker who makes it.[/quote'] and you obviously didn't read this. http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=11529 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 Good job tacking swansont's awesome list to this thread, ecoli. That thing rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cansouth Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 If you have no evidence, there is really no point in posting this. I dont have any statistically evidence, but the evidence exists. If some of you have for example old (from 2004 and older) news tapes from CNN, BBC, Bloomberg or other, you can by yourself registrate (statistically if you want) the blinking increase. The blinking increase may started in januar 2005. So if some of you want to compare you could use tv tapes/records from before januar 2005 and compare with today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 People over the whole world blink with their eyes more then normal. You can study this on TV (Bloomberg, BBC, CNN or other TV-channels). It is very easy to see. I could bet that in the typical studio it´s very bright. That is because the aliens that appear in TV need the energy of the light to keep their human disguise stable. There was a secret NASA paper about this somewhere on the net but the page was shut down. The author mysteriously disappeared shortly after he proclaimed to release a second secret paper which should show the detailed plan of the aliens which want to take over the earth by controling all the media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 OMG!!!! PEOPLE ARE BLINKING!!! THE WORLD IS GONNA END!!!!! seriously why would any hacker want to make people appear to blink more? could it simply be that the people on T.V. are ACTUALLY blinking more and that it is not evil hackers sending malicious signals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Demosthenes- Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 I dont have any statistically evidence, but the evidence exists. That helps alot doesn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 Good job tacking swansont's awesome list to this thread, ecoli. That thing rocks. ty...but the real credit goes to swansont. You're right, its a great thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 I could bet that in the typical studio it´s very bright. That is because the aliens that appear in TV need the energy of the light to keep their human disguise stable. There was a secret NASA paper about this somewhere on the net but the page was shut down. The author mysteriously disappeared shortly after he proclaimed to release a second secret paper which should show the detailed plan of the aliens which want to take over the earth by controling all the media. ROFL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tree Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 Hi.No' date=' I dont have any statistically evidence. But its quite easy to watch it on television. I hoped some of you could observe it by yourself. It IS a hacker who makes it.[/quote']I wasn't majorly questioning your observation, I'll give you the benifit of the doubt on that one. All I ask is that you refute other explinations, that (on top of valid observation) is what makes a theory vaugley sturdy. Here's the alternative explainations again, tell me what makes them less likely than hackerry. As cameras work on a higer framerate, they catch more blinks. As more "real people" wind up on telly they are more self consious than proffesionals and thus blink more. As recording equiptment is more durable, there is less of an obsesion about cleanliness in the studio so more dust: more blinking.Outdoor recordings have also become more commonplace [*]Continual brodcasting discourages broadcasters from taking time off so minor colds would be more common Then you can be taken seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny8522003 Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 Dont forget the bright studio lights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 Dont forget the bright studio lights Or air conditioning... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts