Jump to content

Brain studies show thousands of participants are needed for accurate results


Recommended Posts

My suspicions have been confirmed. When I studied cognitive neuroscience and when I read news in this area, it was and is very disconcerting to see how often far fetched conclusions about causation are made there on a shaky basis of a small sample size, a multitude of uncontrolled parameters, and correlations only. This new study confirms that more often than not these results are unreliable and unreproducible. A new research paradigm is needed to move this science from stagnation.

Quote

The researchers found that brain-behavior correlations identified using a sample size of 25—the median sample size in published papers—usually failed to replicate in a separate sample. As the sample size grew into the thousands, correlations became more likely to be reproduced. 

Brain studies show thousands of participants are needed for accurate results | University of Minnesota (umn.edu)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, my professor in biological statistics was very explicit about these studies.

Here is a recent example of a study with far fetched, unwarranted, and completely speculative conclusions:

Quote

To study this, Rutishauser and his colleagues worked with 20 patients who were undergoing intracranial recording of brain activity to guide surgery for treatment of their drug-resistant epilepsy.

Researchers uncover how the human brain separates, stores, and retrieves memories | National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially with high-dimensional data (incl. MRIs) associations are often spurious. At the same time, only allowing high-participation studies to exist would effectively eliminate smaller labs and result in loss of creativity as studies would only be conducted by a few (successful) folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A "darker" possibility is that MRI scans just don't represent well the underlying factors in the brain that affect behaviors. IOW, MRI scans might be a wrong measure, like scull shapes in phrenology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding sample numbers, aluminium has been linked to Alzheimers but I'm not sure if all victims have aluminium flecks in their brains or just a few.

But on the assumption that there's no smoke without fire, I decided to play it safe and switched from aluminium pots and pans long ago-

Alzheim-alum.jpg

Alum-alzh.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.