IvoryEbony Posted February 12, 2021 Share Posted February 12, 2021 Actually, Neil, there are 5 kinds of truth. The forth being an unreliable source, i.e. a non-proven expert or "pseudoscientists", whom is offering a low-potential truth and a proven source who has demonstrated a superior grasp of overall physics and mathematics compared to others with the same education and resources. In other words, a quick learner. Recently this prodigy has, without aid, hit some geometric bullseyes and now has hit 4 physics mysteries with one "potential" theoretical stone with a possible medical implication that would increase longevity if disclosed. Given his expertise and confidence in the matter compared to how reluctant is to share this new data now as opposed to older and less accurate data in the past, combined with intentionally shadowed proofs that seem legit, we have a high-potential truth. Herein lies the ethical delima, now suppose in some dystopian future medical corporations decide when a person becomes a "grown-up" and where money and politics are just distractions or games until they get there. The reason for this is one objective truth, longevity = average age of parents during subjects conception / average age in which subject's parents hit puberty. So in this allegedly "hypothetical" dystopia people who retain their youths longer in the unlucky control groups are forced to wait longer and longer to have kids. Now one of these unlucky chastity belted lads was the one person in the example who allegedly possesses this "high-potential truth" that has some chance of ending biological aging...period. Yet he demands that in order to reveal his math proofs and match the cosmological constant amount of dark matter and dark energy before revealing to the biologists their rule in aging as a previously unseen variable, he wants to be a 'grownup' before the medical corporations had planned on him becoming a parent which we know will decrease his child's potentially greater fertile lifespan albeit it will still be greater than those of the other control groups. Decisions decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MigL Posted February 13, 2021 Share Posted February 13, 2021 Your posts make my head hurt. They are lik fingernails on a chalk-board. Very annoying. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IvoryEbony Posted February 14, 2021 Author Share Posted February 14, 2021 3 hours ago, MigL said: Your posts make my head hurt. They are lik fingernails on a chalk-board. Very annoying. I hear you. Were I not a careful person, I wouldn't apologize. Sorry. Don't mistake caring for fear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 ! Moderator Note This is blogging, and we're a science discussion forum. Nobody wants to discuss nonsense. Please don't post more like this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts