Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SergUpstart

Hijack from What does it mean that physics it time/CPT symmetric?

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Duda Jarek said:

Otherwise: if baryon number is ultimately conserved, there remains e.g. Cyclic Universe hypothesis: that baryon number was the same in Big Crunch preceding our Big Bang - shifting this problem to minus infinity.

And what can you say about this experiment conducted by NASA in Antarctica

https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/nasa-finds-evidence-of-parallel-universe-where-time-runs-backward-report/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, SergUpstart said:

And what can you say about this experiment conducted by NASA in Antarctica

https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/nasa-finds-evidence-of-parallel-universe-where-time-runs-backward-report/

Parallel universe explanation seems as coming from some Star Trek fans.

Going back to earth, sounds a bit like CPT analogue of laser: with involved particles going in opposite direction, neutrinos here.

wMezM.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, swansont said:

I agree. Nonsense is not nonsense, and the proof of a parallel universe can not be considered. The anomalous signal could have come simply from outside the Universe. Or even its source was in the earth's crust.( There have been reports of a heat source under Antarctica's glaciers) But the statement about a parallel Universe was made by NASA, why did they need it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, SergUpstart said:

I agree. Nonsense is not nonsense, and the proof of a parallel universe can not be considered. The anomalous signal could have come simply from outside the Universe. Or even its source was in the earth's crust.( There have been reports of a heat source under Antarctica's glaciers) But the statement about a parallel Universe was made by NASA, why did they need it?

Did NASA say that? The Post article says "The finding implies that these particles are actually traveling backward in time, suggesting evidence of a parallel universe, according to the Daily Star." (emphasis added)

I don't see a direct quote from NASA making this claim in the Daily Star article. There are quotes saying otherwise.

The blurb "The simplest – and therefore scientifically the most elegant explanation is this: at the moment of the Big Bang two universes were formed – ours, and another one that from our perspective is running in reverse." is unattributed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.