Jump to content

The Poker Correlation to Quantum Mechanics


TakenItSeriously

Recommended Posts

We can try to think of it logically, but I tend to take logic to details that most are not comfortable with, so it may not be much help.

 

let's define the following:

A ≡ entanglement

B ≡ superposition states

C ≡ imaginary hand ranges (as if they were in a suoerposition state)

domains:

X ≡ the Quantum domain

Y ≡ the Human domain

Z ≡ a virtual domain of Y

 

 

 

 

 

To what end? You keep agreeing that there are no QM effects. If there were, you could show it with math. Not some half-assed, ill-defined syllogisms.

 

All I'm asking is you stop making statements that use the terminology of QM effects. There is no superposition, no entanglement. Don't describe poker hands using those terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.