kleinwolf

We have several products in Matrix Mechanics : [math]C=A\otimes B \approx A_{ij}B[/math] Tensor product Here A acts on a particle, and B on another particle. [math]C=A\cdot B=\sum_k A_{ik}B_{kj}[/math] Matrix product Here B acts on a particle, A acts after it on the same particle. what about [math]C:=A\times B=A_{ij}B_{ij}[/math] Element product ?

What about eating sick animals flesh ?

Right, this is not my native language. Do you have any reference to the effect of split-brain on the vision ? Do those patient really get 2 independent "screens" on the outer world ?

In the Bible : "..reproduce between your specie..." some tried between species and saw that they do not reproduce (no mutants created, only diseases were transmitted) I don't know if the biblical law comes from the experience, or the experience comes after, as a law-enforcement.

1) isn't it that : "measuring A without disturbing B" is not possible with a singlet state ? (end different from initial state) I feel EPR as a psycho-analysis of behavior towards the "rules" a) do you accept the rules, or refuse from the onset ? b) to which point do you apply the rules ? c) do you want to modify the rules ?

a toad ? This is maybe hallucinogen toads, having mucilaginous stuff on their back ? I heard that aids maybe come from inter-species between human and monkeys.

It's not just for fun, it's an exercise too, to try having intercourse, better than self-satisfaction, because looking the world outside and other people. But, in our society everything has to be reachable in the smallest amount of time, and time is money, this is a sad-end a world of individuals, relationships are always more seldom.

Maybe too in the liquid around a growing foetus (amniotic) should stay a heap of growth signal molecules ?? I don't know if there are references of injection of this liquid or application like a cream on organs ?

Do you know if this activity can lead to higher blood pressure ?

Well, maybe expressed like this : a) in the rest frame of the source of the flash, a circle. We express every "ray" with an angle a b) in the moving frame, again a circle. let every "ray" be determined by angle b Then, we match, or link, every ray in a with b, and the function b(a) is not the identity, so that in the moving frame, it could be described as a gray-shaded interior disc of radius c. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedOh, I found a simpler way to express this : - O' moves along x, with speed v towards O, the gamma time-dilatation factor is [math]\gamma>1[/math]. -Consider an object moving with speed vy in O => no space contraction along y' => time dilation gamma, this factor acts on every direction, hence => speed vy'=vy/[math]\gamma[/math]<vy Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedImagine a detector array in O', moving along x to the right with speed v -) This detector does not move towards O' -)Now we consider a light ray emitted in O, in direction y. In this case, On the detector, it's obvious that the trace is not along y, because the decector cell at O (origin of O) changes, and moves to the right with speed v, seen from O. -) in O' we deduce (cehck) that several cells along x are activated, so the light moves not purely along the perpendicular direction.

I wrote "S" for "split" or "schiz", but change for cameleon, but not in the following. That if C sees 2 points, how does it decide if it's the same, that in A mode only 1 is seen ?

Suppose we consider a Minkowski diagram of a moving frame O' with speed v towards O We consider a moving particle with speed v1 in O. How to determine and What is the speed in O' ? a) We get co- and contra- variants coordinates. b) we get an angle Can this be decided by the speed addition formula ? (a) implies that even a 1-dimensional speed is a vector, so the norm squared should be co- times contra-variant ?

Suppose we define 2 vision modus, as a priori function of the brain : modus A : both eyes are use together to count a moving point modus C : every eye is used alternatively, very quickly (CT) , or A seeing at infinity (CI) Then a) if a point is in the region seen by only 1 eye, then S says 1 point, A says 1 point b) if a point is in the region seen by 2 eyes, if focalised, A says 1, S says 2. Is this possible that in split brain operation this could happen ? We could imagine a PNL program to change this, maybe in the corpus. I imagined that A can learn from C modus, that is an object, let say a banknote is not seeable in both eye, that maybe there exist 2 worlds, that every eye give, and to be sure that this banknote exist, it could be better to ask to see it in the other eye, as a verification. In fact, two philosophical vision can be taken : A admit that exterior datas are given to the brain through eyes, whereas C could say that the eye is just projecting inner datas from brain, like in a movie theater ?

The velocities distribution is centered at O only at T=0 If T>0, it should be a "crown" : velocities have their base on the previous "circle", isn't it ? we could add relativistically [math]\vec{v}\oplus_r\vec{c}[/math]. with [math]\left\|\vec{v}\oplus_r\vec{c}\right\|^2=c^2[/math].

This is the difference between "velocity" and "speed" speed is c velocity could be written [math]\vec{c}[/math] Maybe the key point is "when" we consider the velocity distribution *) T=0 : the velocities are distributed on the origin of the flash, a point at O the norm is the speed c, hence a circle, all direction considered *) T>0 : the velocities are distributed on the previous circle their norm is c Erratum : the title is wrong chosen for the contain, it should be : shape of a wave-front seen from different observer

The speed of light in vacuum is constant. "Speed" is a vector, or as a scalar ? I found 2 formulas on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula#Special_case:_orthogonal_velocities Speed addition of orthogonal speeds U and V : S=V+Sqrt(1-V²/c²)*U (the case of c in y direction and -v in x ): a) V=c U=-v => S=c(ey) (we hide v speed of the observer in the Lorentz singularity) b) V=-v U=c => S=-v(ex)+sqrt(1-v²/c²)*c(ey) (check : S²=c²) So it's not a way to decide (?)

Well, there are a lot of posts. For example NowThatWeKnow gravitation : suppose a light beam horizontally emitted, the aequivalence principle says there is a vertical component and hence is bent (but the speed norm remains c), Now For a light flash, emitted from an observer. The speed for a moving observer O' with speed vx should be obtained by relativistic speed addition 1D : (&): va & vb =(va+vb)/(1+va*vb/c^2) For example : along x as seen in O' : -vx & c=c and -vx & (-c)=-c along y ... we cannot because the formula is only 1-dimensional. hence : (vx,vy)&(va,vb)<>(vx&va,vy&vb) (this is obvious for (vx,0)&(0,c) were (vx,c) whose norm > c We could a) use a full 2d Lorentz Boost to deduce the speed addition law (with crossed terms) or maybe b) reason like this : the resulting speed seen at angle (a) for the moving obs, is (vx & c*cos(a),wy) and wy is the speed of the photon along y-direction, still unkown, but from the condition (vx & c*cos(a))^2+wy^2=c^2 (speed of light is conserved) ??

I reasoned with point (2) : speed of light is "always" c...consider a circular flash at rest, observed when you travel at speed vx in direction x, and consider the part of the light flying "perpendicularly" in direction y, let say with speed vy, then vx²+vy²=c², hence vy is "smaller" than c, and hence it should grow as an ellipse, because in the direction x, the speed of the light is c. However how to "observe" this, could maybe with photodetectors placed at long distances..but I have no idea about technical feasibility thereof.

Are those both facts true : a ) Suppose a circular wave is made in water, when seen from a plane, this is a moving circle b) Suppose a light flash was emitted in vacuum, when seen from a fast moving observer, this should be an ellipse (longer in the direction of the speed) ?

If we imagine an experience with blood-type as doubly hidden variable (blood is hidden in the body and heart, and we don't tell the blood type), like a classroom where only 1 individual of A blood in a group of O people, that this will have so tiny influence, that it will probably remain unnoticeable, even after a hundreds of experiments, and even if the blood-type were set as a simply hidden variable (we say the person blood group), I found no references for this, and Probably that there will be no remarkable influence of this hidden variable.

I sometimes fell about the uncomfortable thought that since blood groups appeared, that statistics could show a link between blood and wealth or mentality. Suppose this were in some sense right, and that a couple forms, in which a partner had a "stronger" blood, that the other would be beaten, in some sense. Or that for example depending on the blood distribution in a family, the oedipus complex could be increased or decreased. Do you have any idea about this.

This section is more medical, and as an elliptic (secret) science, we will never read or speak about it, all this will be kept secret. Masturbate to get rid of old sperm : I don't think, you can have night pollution, during dreams for example. You don't need to "beat the small" (masturbate) for ejaculation (barbarian), and we beat the people masturbating..violence is sadly probably unavoidable in society Maybe there are several masturbation type : -fist, we beat the small, and this makes pleasure. -3 fingers (be more patient, most of the time it gets not very high : we break your head), -colombine--->Amerika, very old (from Colombus), here the penis enters, the shoulders get down and you transform in a spyder or a woman I don't know ? -(to be completed) Key point -- Remember that masturbation causes homosexuality but I don't know which psychological influence it could have. No reference for this. The joke is that human evolved from monkey by masturbation, because the male human has always the penis outside. The point is how to reduce (avoid is impossible, because violence is omnipresent) masturbation, because it presses on the blood vessel of the penis and maybe this left it in a smaller size than natural, and I think masturbation can even lead to more probable violent acts, or psychophatic, and smell even. The first post was saying that the body cannot distinguish between masturbation and sexual act, this is wrong, because in a sexual act chemical substances are exchanged, if no condoms are used.

Yes, I meant bio-synthetic endorphines, since those are not alien substances, they should work better, just a question of quantity. With exogenous substances, I don't understand how researcher find the plants needed, far on earth, is this by trial and error (or noticing) at random ? The point is maybe the dependence towards exogenous substances, which are unknown in the body, whereas endogenous substances are "already" in the list. But I heard that if you receive a treatement with endogenous substances, like hormons, then the body stops to produce them, because generate an internal disorder : the brain notices a hormon increase whereas he didn't asked for anything like this ? It's not an alien substance alert, but could be even more disturbing. For example I heard that the topic use of hGH could have interaction with the nervous system and induce growth of other parts of the body, like if there were links, as in traditional medicine. But I have no reference for this.

Do you know if morphine is stronger than endorphine as a treatment against pain ?

Well, human is not organized like insect societies, we all have the chance to access to the battle for reproduction, but in some cases, it's obvious that some humans never will be able to reproduce or, more severely, be authorized to reproduce.