NSX

Okay, then d

All of the above.

Maybe the sound intensity and frequency is too high?

alt_f13 said in post # :

 

This thread was part of an in-depth look into the human behavioral system, mainly used for observing how people react when faced with a controversial, provocative suggestion.  ie, I was pulling your legs.

 

 

 

[Got Sarcasm?]

DancerB said in post # :

I think you don't really know what you're talking about. I think that information is completely false and where ever you got that information was a messed up site.

Video games surprise me. Most girls i know use the net for email, research, and chatting.

hm...I'm not sure what NaC₃H₅O₂ is, but when we had questions like these in CHem I, we know that it's a weak acid or base (since it's not a strong one).

SO if it is a weak base or acid, the Na dissociates with the C₃H₅O₂, and they undergo fwd. and bckwd. Rx until reaching an equilibrium. Usually, you need a K_a or K_b to solve these kinda' things, so you can figure out the concentration of H₃O⁺.

Then you can you the pH definition:

pH = -log([H₃O⁺])

Well, English & Math/Science are usually the core of any cirricula. Psychology...is more of a specialization. Even at my old high school, we could take Psychology as a grade 12 course, given we took any grade 11 science course.

That's pretty cool. I read that in the paper yesterday too.

It goes on to say how our Milky Way's center does this every so often as well.

yummy

As far as I know, chemotherapy is like a drug/medicine taken into the body that is usually used to treat cancers.

Here's a good site w/ lots of info. on cancer, and related topics.

IN particular, linked to the Chemo. part:

http://www.cancerbacup.org.uk/Treatments/Chemotherapy/Chemotherapy

lol

I remember from The Simpsons:

Lisa: "*gasp* Their periodic table has 250 elements!"

Actually, I'm reading Think by Blackburn for my Philosophy class. It's not really a textbook.

Whenever I click on the smilie list (after going to get more) i get the message:

The page you requested does not exist on this server (/forums/java%20script:opener.smilie(':confused:')). 404

:/

MrL_JaKiri said in post # :

 

Everyone should watch Bebop.

bebop?

My little brother was part of a extra-cirricular science club last year.

I noticed that what really gets kids excited is the Chemistry experiments.

i remember the first time i saw vinegar poured onto baking soda

so cool

use i² = -1

Better yet, use scientific notation.

Neurocomp2003 said in post # :

ALL i gotta say is WOOHOO they are offering

MSc in Game development!!!!!!

What? WHere?

my friend is taking Software Engineering, and there's MASc. for that i think;

That's a good idea, but remember, that age group needs parental consent and all that stuff.

Actually, I was mistaken.

The symbol e was first used by mathematician Leonhard Euler to represent the base of natural logarithms in a letter to another mathematician, Christian Goldbach, in 1731

p. 341

Logarithms were invented by the Scottish mathematician John Napier. Although he did not introduce the natural[i/] logarithmic functino, it is sometimes called the Napierian logarithm.

p. 341

Napier coined the term logarithm, from the two Greek words logos (or ratio) and arithmos (or number) to describe the theory that he spent 20 years developing and that first appeared in the book Mirifici Logarithmorum canonis descriptio (A description of the Marvelous Rule of Logarithms)

p .315

Larson, Hostetler, Edwards. Calculus 7^th ed.

InTeReStInG eH?

MrL_JaKiri said in post # :

 

0^0 is undefined, because the proof for 0 powers doesn't hold.

How does that proof gO?

I think writing is just like any art. Feelings can help you to write, just as they help a painter paint, a musician play, etc.

greg1917 said in post # :

The Bible.

I've always wanted to do that too. =/ which version are you reading?

Sayonara³ said in post # :

Finished Catcher and Brave New World; I'm now on "Memoirs of a Geisha".

 

Does anyone know if there's some sort of clever in-joke centered around the word "indefatiguable" in BNW? Huxley uses the word in every chapter without fail until about 2/3 of the way through, where he stops using it completely

How is Catcher in the Rye? I hear its good, and i've been plannign to borrow it from me friend.

indefatigable...kinda' like Lenina's performance?

anywho, i'm just reading textbooks; i'm not as fortunate as you guys who have the freedom to choose what you read

I dont understand. What's the big deal?

Maybe all your stressing is causing it?

:awaits scientific refute and/or agreement:

Hades said in post # :

like we typically do in orgo chem, natural log is much like an average that we use.... yet i still dont see the relationship.

Like faf said.

b/c we can easily do stuff like :lint:xⁿdx, where n :neq: -1.

But for n = -1, we can't do :lint:dx/x. i think i remember reading about a letter between euler and another mathematician (?) talking about this discrepancy. then, they created the function you now know as LN.

Hades said in post # :

Also, what purpose does this have when im using LN to determine graphically Ea of a reaction?

YOu mean E_a? ACtivation Energy?

newmember said in post # :

As long as wavelength not too short (like visible light) the light interacting with matter can be seen as wave but when wavelength is shortens (frequency grows) the mathematical description of interaction must consider the light to be particle-like

That's right.

Some even go onto say that our (humans) wavelength is VEEERRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYY BBBIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGG and that's why we don't appear wavelike.

I'm going to be reading about Quantum Physics in 2 days, i'll gladly put whatever i find cool

agaubr said in post # :

How do you explain the photoelectric efect if the photon has no mass?

 

Ag

THe photon excites the e- to a higher orbit, than nanoseconds later, the e- falls back down & emits the photon again.

alt_f13 said in post # :

If I were to convert photons to, say, electrons, would the gravity of the resultant electrons equal the gravity of the non coverted photons?

 

Assume the conversion was 100% efficient.

I'm not really sure how you would go about doign that...

Force of gravity depends on mass, but mass is related to energy...

sorry, this is beyond my scope of things

maybe MrL?