Blade

let's see how a bout bush as a source fore the 3 jobs. http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=84123 and fore critical thinking? what about working hours http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/workhours.html and health http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7184214/site/newsweek/ people should not put up with it. that's logic. I can not grasp the ruthless enslavement the american people are undergoing by big company's. personally as an democrat socialist old school style (means dividing wealth equally and government taking care fore it's people who are not born in to wealth.) i would not put up with it at all.

then the wages should change accordingly. inflation/deflation. people are not supposed to work 3 jobs to pay fore primary life needs. what happend to socialism? are the rich people telling the poor to fear socialism or something?

don't write Carlin off too fast. he is right about who owns the amerika media. Rupert Murdoch. and do company owners want critical thinkers? not in america they don't. and the dissapearing of the middle class is also evidence that big bussnes is winning over education. normal people go on strike before they work 3 jobs and still can't pay the bills. look at frence.

in responce to the miss teen carolina comedy thread. Now seriously. what would the real answer be? this movie is about a monopoly and a strong union that's the blame 20/20 Stupid in America http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfRUMmTs0ZA in this stand up comedy big company's are the blam that want's to keep their workers stupid so they don't know any better. George Carlin: education and the owners of America http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccYoVnBc_fk or are they both right. nobody knows or has an opinion? i find that hard to belive. don't be scared.

well fore one thing. the forums here are not active enough to hang around and f5 all the time. and how am i supposed to put that long documentary in words.

War is fore the war profiteers http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-6621486727392146155&q=war+profiteers&total=431&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Medical insurance will not dissapear. People in my country can get treatment without medical insurrance but they will be fined because they don't have insurrance. here it's illigal to not be insurred. And here in the Netherlands it's illigal fore hospital to refuse treatment. i'm not sure what will happen if they refuse to threat an not insured person but i am sure there will be hell to pay. Hospitals get government money if they threat not insurred people.

Miss South Carolina gets a second chance. Not so good for her http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiJBKmOWphs

In short: The diffrence between truth and lies.

gotta love video google. This interview was filmed for the TV documentary "Root of All Evil?" but was left out of the final version. Time restrictions dictated that ... alle » not all interviews filmed could be used. This was especially regrettable in the case of the McGrath interview, which is therefore offered here now, unedited. http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=6474278760369344626&q=dawkins+duration%3Along&total=146&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3

my 2 cents on time travel: Time in the first place is onley a measurement. Time is not real. So how can time travel ever be real?

That Documentary Obsession: radical Islams war against the west is a better warning about radical religions then the whole CNN series.

That "Documentary" Obsession: radical Islams war against the west Is that just really biased? How much of that is true?

R. Dawkings could / should have used more material from Derren Brown fore illustration. like: Derren Brown "voodoo" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW2yKlNFFuU Derren Brown "instant conversion" part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Sq-YUdq1OI Derren Brown "instant conversion" part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DylNVUN_3I Derren Brown - Cold Reading http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btP_vy5cQq4

Who's gonna watch CNN's Gods warriors? http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2007/gods.warriors/ seems interresting.

Polution should be seen as displacement. fore instance: Quicksilver can be a pollutand when it's arround humans and animals. But when it's found in its natural surroundings then that's fine. Every thing we use todat was already present on this planet in one form or another. When we get oil to the survace and burn it as fuel this could have consequences. The world oceans can't absorb all that co2 that fast and/or nature can't absob all of that co2.

People who doubt if global warming is man made or not. I don't know either. Would it not make sense if air poluting would be minimized anyway fore the sake of people and nature. would that make sense?

Thank you fore the answers. Now i know fore sure HIV causes AIDS.

Hmmm..... Then it can also mean that Duesberg's (unproven but reasonable) hypothesis and the current HIV-AIDS hypothesis can both be true

Duesberg's (unproven but reasonable) hypothesis is that long term drug use will undermine the immune system. He covers other risk groups: many gay men tend to be drug users (esp. nitrite inhalants, or "poppers", as aphrodisiacs) ( Documentation here), babies dying from AIDS got drugs via their pregnant drug-using mothers, blood transfusion recipients are often already sick and die from the pre-existing illness (50% die within one year regardless of HIV status), hemophiliacs taking (toxic) Factor VIII get their clotting ability but lose their immune system. He also defines a new risk group: people who take AZT, ddI, or ddC (all highly toxic products of cancer chemotherapy research) to stop HIV, end up with AIDS anyway. (SF HEAL adds D4T and 3TC to the list of toxic anti-retrovirals.) In an interview for SPIN magazine , Duesberg complains that the same government which finances HIV-AIDS research will not finance drug-AIDS research. (Kary Mullis's hypothesis is that AIDS is caused not by HIV but by other retroviruses. Mullis, Charles Thomas Jr., and Phillip Johnson ask "What Causes AIDS?", but their answer is, basically, "something other than HIV".) A pathologist and toxicologist, Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati argues that AIDS is caused by various toxins.

Isn't it weird that there is on conclussive evidence?

but there is no proof that HIV inpairs the immume system. in that documentary atleast.

I got a question. Ever since i watched this documentary i wonder if it's true. Dous anyone have proof that HIV causes aids? documentary: http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=5064591712431946916&q=hiv+aids+fraud&total=48&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1 Disclaimer: This dous not mean that if u have HIV-AIDS that u should not take medicines. Do Whatever the doctors tell u.