DimaMazin

You can just prove that there is no ACG52.

Far from gravitational masses electromagnetic accelerator accelerates a body.The accelerator feels the force. Very fast free planet can create gravitational forces to the accelerating body,though the body can have insignificant acceleration in space. You have forgotten electromagnetic accelerator.I am exacter here.

Wrong. Stationary twin feels forces action on him from escaping twin.You do not define a quantitative disagreement of these feelings which are necessary that you would be right.

Scalar time is one number to one clock for any observer in any frame.

Is life time of the first muon longer than life time of the second muon in frame of the second muon?

Answer can be correcting the wrong question. For example 1)Nohow 2)Relativity doesn't define 3)Scalar time doesn't exist for relative travelers in relativity

Do you think time is scalar only after trip?

Yes.Thanks.

Motionless(relatively of Earth) muon is created at basis of Earth( at the same time the moving muon is created). The motionless muon decays earlier than their collision can happen.Therefore in Earth's frame they can't collide.What causes the decay of the muon earlier than their collision happens in the moving muon frame?In fact the distance is contracted.

If time is relative then acceleration relatively of gravitational fields is important. If time is scalar then only speed in gravitational fields is important.Signal can show only past age.

No.

Contracted distance and slowed time of motionless(relatively of Earth)muon,in frame of fast(relatively of Earth)muon,can't cause decay of motionless(relatively of Earth) muon earlier than collision of the muons will happen.However the decay happens earlier than the collision.

Then in frame of muon,which is fast traveler relatively of Earth,motionless (relatively of Earth) muon decays later. Of course you can prove it never.Because traveling(relatively of Earth) muon can collide with particles of decay of motionless(relatively of Earth) muon.

Time isn't relative because addition of times is simple without Lorentz's transformation .Time is scalar.Experiments prove it.All observers can always agree whose time is slower and whose time is faster.

Fast traveler escapes from us.If acceleration moved clock of the traveler into our frame(motionless relatively of us) then how do we and the traveler define scalar slowing or rapidness of time of the clock relatively of the traveler?

Idea earns money for all humanity.One even best speculator can't earn the same money without participation of people.

No. Acceleration remits time into slower or faster status.

That is useless for me.

Earth measures photons travel with own clock.Moon measures photons travel with own clock.The measurements aren't equal.

What is shorter?

Acceleration of traveler into system of observer restores the image of real age.

Increasing of distance increases interval of time between signals of ageing of escaping traveler.Because light, from each subsequent attribute of ageing, needs additional time for overcoming the increased distance.Reducing of distance reduces interval of time between signals of ageing of approaching traveler.Because light,from each subsequent attribute of ageing,needs less time for overcoming the reduced distance.

Of course distance exists in my experiment,but my experiment doesn't need measured distance.This freedom has a sense in pure studying of time.

Well.But then who sees delaying time of neighbour?