DimaMazin

Thanks.

My idea is so. Velocity v is between S and S' . gamma=1/(1-v2/c2)1/2. Object travels with velocity u in rame S. Norm of relation between distances and times is defined by gamma. u is rate of change of distance at time in S and it is the same when S travels in S'. We should only transform it relative to distance and time of S'. Then u transforms into u/gamma. And we should add velocity v. u'=v-u/gamma Einstein's velocity u' is another and therefore it changes norm of contracted and not contracted distances and times. Therefore it is incorrect.

I made correct math. Genady don't understand it because he is ortodoxal. You don't understand it because you understant no math at all.

Concrete mathematics was created by smoked brain. We cannot apply it anywhere.

We consider physics and the mathematics has no relation to the physics.

What experiment did Einstein present to the formula?

We should consider million experiments simultaneously?

What experiment proves the mathematics?

My definition is observing therefore the formula of scientists is disinformation.

Correct formula should be u'=v-u/gamma We can use it for velocities of non-simultaneouses ,wich are defined by MD65536.

I incorrectly started to define. There is simple definition. Instant pure acseleration has double disareement in simultaneity. Therefore neutral simultaneity is negative relative to it. t=t0-(gamma-1)x/(gamma×v) Time between events in the non-simultaneity is the same in 2 frames.

Thanks. That looks like triangle with sides gamma*v , gammau*u , and gammau'*u' . If we have many travelers with velocities between 0 and v and we add their gamma*velocity between them then can we get circular arc?Is then gamma*v a diameter or chord of the arc?

Theoretically I should get the same module of the velosity in S', but my brain is not working.

When body A is moving with velocity v relative to frame S then it is observer in S' and has velocity o in S'. Body O is observer in S. What is velocity of body B in frame S' when it travels with velocity u=v(4-3v2/c2)1/2 in S frame?

For example body travels at v and has momentum m*gamma*v. Then let's define at what velocity the body has 1/2 the momentum. gamma*v/2=v/2(1-v2/c2)1/2 v/2(1-v2/c2)1/2=gamma'*u=u/(1-u2/c2)1/2 u=v/(4-3v2/c2)1/2 I don't understand how relativity works, but do you think the velosity is another in S'(the frame is frame of the body at v)? And if non-simultaneities of u(in S) and u'(in S') are simultaneous then why we cannot use them as neutral simultaneity?

The red lines forbid to destroy bridges of logistics supply. Who creates the red lines and how gets money for it ?

It is complex theory like Theory of Evolution. What is the derivation; for example you want to earn money then should you think what your job creates, who and how uses it?And I think when your job is not connected with securing discoveries then it can cause a conflict. Discovery is good thing for all. What do you want to get when you serve for fools which cannot make discoveries?

Improvement the standard of living in the US can be a good response against the aggression of backward regimes. I don't understand why the need should need this data.

I think the simplest problem, of the similars, is sector area = chord2 a/2 = 2-2cos(a) But I don't know how to solve it.

American dollars lie and do not work in other countries. Inflation causes them to work.

We discuss what is response.

Yes. But we can solve simpler problem. a=2sin(a) ((sin-P/4)*2-sin*(-cos))*2 = sin-2sin*(-cos)-4(sin-P/4) sin = (2/7)P a=(4/7)P Area of segment of angle a = (1/7)P Area of segment of angle (3/14)P = (1/14)P Exuse me. I have mistaken again. I incorectly made the equation. In correct equation the variables annihilate.

Again my formula works there. Merkel was finansing Putin. Putin was finansing Alternative for Germany. Therefore Merkel was finansing Alternative for Germany. Discoveries are money. Other money leads us to war.

Well. Ukrainians were in panic and therefore they were some dangerous. Do Europeans think that Ukrainians will be less dangerous under Russian flags?

Do you think that Obama and Trump want to help to Ukraine? And do you think that they have no influence in Biden's government and in The Washington Post? Then why this article is published in this concrete day?