JaKiri

Recorded in a manner which lets us know about it today, which even includes things like talking to people about it. As we lack evidence for a prior example, it's pretty safe to assume that it didn't exist, and even if it had existed, it wouldn't affect us anyway because we don't know about it. People in general, I presume.

If they had, it certainly lacked any mathematics to go with it.

Newton introduced the concept of a relative spatial system. See now?

You appear to be having a problem with the english language.

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

they'd both be pretty damaging, but the drop would be severely limited because, whilst 'powerful', it would run out of reactant fairly quickly.

It's also fairly likely in the short term unless a reliable and cheap antiagapic is discovered.

I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

No, that would be the empirically evidenced inherent randomness.

Space which is entirely relative. Durr.

Yes indeed!

We're talking about rest (or invariant) mass here using shorthand.

If we weren't accelerating at that rate, we'd either be pulled into the sun or fly off at a tangent. It's the centripetal acceleration.

The quantum foam. Or fuzz. Or whatever term you wish to use.

Forces and energies are connected at a fundamental level. One is the integrated other, with respect to displacement.

From the start of the Principia, I believe. Oh, and it seems you've missed off the rather critical second sentance, and beyond.

You have.

I'm a trendsetter!

Or a definition of relative ootions. I think we've reached the limit of this trend.

I'd argue that the main problem of QM is its incompatability with GR.

Mass and (any given other form of energy, for example, kinetic or gravitational) are two aspects of 'energy' entire.

It's because, when you're talking about changing energy into mass and vice versa, the equation in question is (delta)E = (delta)mc^2. No such equation exists for mass and volume; E=mc^2 doesn't mean that mass can be changed into energy per se, just like volume = mass / density doesnt' mean that volume can be changed into mass.

The definition of relative motion.

Replace the 0.1 with any positive real number and that's true as well.

It's a simple harmonic motion when referring to a 1 dimensional view of the orbit, technically it isn't of course.