Sohan Lalwani

Animals present various forms of communication, everything counts including but not limited to chemical signals, reactions to physical stimuli, and audio based communication. Please stop trying to argue for the sake of nothing Animals can communicate via sound, that is talking in some sense

Thank you for the explanation +1

I think it would be better to say primary, not the standard

Interesting, thanks for the new word

It is there extremely poor attempt to eradicate terrorists from the area, though one of the shittiest tactics I have seen.

I never said Hamas runs Gaza, Fatah and others also maintains slightly less significant presence there. I’m pointing out that this issue is way more complex and nuanced than a simple debate thread.

Please understand their is a greater nuance, its not solely on Israel. I highly doubt Hamas has committed no war crimes. Keep a 2 state solution, or integrate both to be a unified state. Give enough global resources so Palestine can get back on their feet and significantly limit the amount of terrorist based presence in the region, stop illegal Israeli settlement all together and have Peacekeepers deployed in combat situations where Hamas militants encroach on Israeli towns, have everywhere in a 20 mile radius from a hospital a safe zone from aerial bombardment, increase the presence of emergency physicians and public health workers in Gaza, and hold both accountable for heinous crimes. Both sides have committed very heinous crimes against man, we should be focused on curbing it not blaming a party.

I'm saying I understand what you are saying. Lord help you, Dave.

I'm saying I understand what you are saying. Lord.

From now on if you are comfortable let’s use animals in general if possible for this thread Chimpanzees fight in clans, which can be viewed as politics since they have a social hierarchy. They are also extremely coordinated in their attacks so it is to some extent premeditation as such guerrilla warfare is very difficult to conduct without planning prior. I second this, how would an ant know?

I see, ok I will try again

This is going slightly off topic, we are talking about animals in general not insects alone. Animals could kill out of politics/clans, an example is that chimps may raid neighboring groups and kill individuals, often with coordinated attacks These events can be linked to group related conflicts and not always for territory or hunger. So to some extent yes

I use memes quite frequently, there is no way to prove I use an LLM in my arguments. I do admit that I used it once to verify my argument before I was told I can’t use it.

I use memes there is no way to confirm I used an LLM, some of responses could be better but DV's are for a variety of reasons. Its a little concerning that some statements have less than if not more than mine.

It's still choosing not to eat the fish, it can realize its not hungry, so it chooses not to kill more. Insects don't have religions, some have colonies which they are loyal too. Those colonies whether intra/interspecific do genocide, mass killings, and slavery.

Friendly fire and with other species 🤪 Let’s say a gharial has eaten enough fish, it sees another fish swimming and doesn’t eat it out of lack of hunger (choosing not too). Isn’t that sentience? It makes it more confusing. Perhaps there was a grizzly bear of human intelligence that was explaining something and said “Grizzly Bears and animals,” it makes them sound like a different class when they are the same thing. Actually, some locusts become can become carnivorous either independently or in response to ecological pressures. Insects do not have religion from what I know, however, certain species DO massacre and enslave overrun colonies. Good day

I see

I upvoted it, it makes no sense to DV Elaborate please

Sure sure buddy

I understand your statement, but how would you define sentience? The ability to make decisions? If so, I would say an insect is sentient. Also, Homo Sapiens are on the same phylogenetic tree as all other organisms so we ourselves are animals to some extent. Speaking in modern terms,, domesticated animals are very friendly within most occasions yes, but there are numerous examples paleontologically speaking that can suggest otherwise. One was found in Swartkrans, South Africa where a Paranthropus robustus skullcap (SK 54) had two puncture marks on the cranium that match the spacing of modern leopard canines. The damage aligns with the killing method leopards use: biting into the back of the skull. Citation: Brain, C.K. (1981). The Hunters or the Hunted? Another was found in Bouri Formation, Ethiopia where some Hominin tibia fragment and other bones with drag and bite marks. The specific species is debated but based off of current evidence, the most likely species is Australopithecus garhi about 2.5 million years ago. Various puncture and drag marks that closely match the bite patterns of crocodilians were found, including bones that also showed teeth scoring consistent with crocodile feeding behavior. Citation: White et al. (1999). Nature 371 Finally, probably the most famous one and my personal favorite is the Taung Child in South Africa. The specimen was an Australopithecus africanus juvenile skull around 2.5 MYA which had severe skull and eye socket damage consistent with modern eagle attacks on monkeys. This includes but is not limited to talon marks around the orbits and base of the skull suggest raptorial predation. Citation: Berger & Clarke (1995), Journal of Human Evolution I hope you found this helpful, good day. I am very curious because I am an ant nerd, do you have a favorite species?

10/10 explanation, but the same rules apply. Animals decieve and murder, take Myrmaplata plataleoides, or specific scorpionfly species.

what astronomically helpful input this is

I’ve never heard of the term sec as a variable

Ok 👍 I thought I could make another thread regarding jokes, apologies then That’s the whole point of the joke