Imagine Everything

Firstly, please don't +1 this, I posted this to simply say thank you to you all for taking the time to share your knowledge, your wisdom & your time. It's not about me, it's about you, the resident & other experts. You don't have to do this, you don't have to put up with people who can be annoying or have a minimal grasp on maths etc yet you do & you all keep doing it. I appreciate it & am grateful for your time & knowledge, not just here on the forum but also the years you have all put into your various skill sets so you can help others. One of the fundamental things that ALL people have, is the ability to give. So this is my give to you, Thank you.

If anyone else reading this has had trouble with that part of your body, you should absolutely go & get checked asap, no matter how old you are. Especially if you are losing weight too.

Thanks @swansont , that's very interesting.

Thanks @studiot , I will have a look at that. I guess I started the debate about not being answered because I was waiting 3 weeks ish & still nothing. I know it was Christmas & I wasn't criticising, it just leaves me wondering whether I'm being silly whilst also frustrating for me because I simply don't know if I have asked stupid questions. I don't expect you guys to answer everything & perhaps people like that Jacek character put you all off a bit from answering others, I can understand that. Poor old Mordred came back from a busy rl & walked straight into him or her. For what it's worth I learnt a great deal from the way @Mordred responded to him or her. I question myself, the things I do or say, more than I do all of you or anyone else. I still question myself over why I got so dissapointed at perhaps being thought of as possibly crank ish by @MigL in my other post. I should have embraced that in hindsight, even being wrong is a way to learn. It feels similar to my thought pattern that what a person says is as important as what someone doesn't say. But in that case, it was me who perhaps said the wrong thing. The things I've talked about here with you all are very strange to me. This vision thing is very strange to me yet I seem compelled somehow to follow it still, as much as I can anyway. Anyway, time for me to go look up Through normal distribution, when you observe each & every measurement of x, do the individual measurements/observations mean anything to you other than just a single part of the normal distribution? Is the overall normal distribution the only things that matters? Hope I said that right. Also hope you got your computer sorted out, I know how annoying that is.

If a particle is created & decays almost instantly, does or can the wavelength from the created particle carry on kinetically? If it can, does it also decay or can it contribute to a knock on effect? I'm thinking of Ke traveling through water after a landslip into that body of water.

Thanks @exchemist

I'm afraid I'm left wondering if I am asking silly questions sometimes, I see no one replied to the above. It would be nice for someone to even say that to me as it would help me understand a bit more perhaps. I won't bite if you think I'm being crank ish. Anyway, Are photons pretty much everywhere? Are photons a medium through which all? or certain? types of wavelength/s pervade? Dark or light. Are there still 'dark' photons that exist today? And if there are, do they also interact somehow with light photons?

Added the missing 's' to ecclesiastical. . I think of this next poem in the tune of Old MacDonald had a farm Natural science has a forum, Phi Pi Phi Bio, And on that forum were experts who helped the to & fro, With an up quark here and a down quark there, Dark matter flowing through the eternal aether, Natural science has a forum, Phi Pi Phi Bio. And on that forum were students, Chi Bi Chi Geo, Some did learn and some did not, some were in despair, With a BH here and an EH there, Space so vast and things so rare, Natural science leads us all, Chi, Pi, Phi, Bio.

Two priests in a bar Two priests in a bar looking so sad, One asks the bartender how much is his tab, £5M pounds, you've run a large bill, Might buy a safe that won't fit in a till, Priest no.1 asks the other for money, Priest no.2 says no! don't be funny, The sum is too vast, way way way too fantastical, He shouldn't charge priests, it's not ecclesiatical.

Thanks @studiot Whats the maths equation for that please? It might be useful later on. And the error could be or is decay/creation interaction? Just a thought but this almost looks a bit like half a wavelength to me. Is there an opposite bell curve too?

Interesting play on words/idea. @geordief If anyone found my newton reply cheesy, would that make it a mulled whine?. (wine)

Thanks @studiot I think I understand what you mean. Is random radioactive decay a variation? Also, is there common variations & or deviations in all measurements?. Does/do one or more stand out often when calculating an equation?.

Yet under a tree an apple did fall, A genius left to wonder & mull.

That sounds very very confusing. Thanks. It kind of helps.

Bill Nye is clever, one scientist of many, Kaku is too, he's probably made quite a penny, Parallel worlds, strings you say, Hopefully science will learn it one day, Science is awesome, it made you & me, Maybe one day, it might answer the BB, What happened to start with, what happening now, I tilt my hat, you all get a bow.

Is random radiation decay not entropic then? Do you know the pattern that it decays at & knowing so can add that into your equations? I don't mean to sound hung up on radiation decay. I'm interested in the results you get from your measurements. Their accuracy & tolerance I think. Does that mean that most or all errors are accounted for & considered in any equation science makes?. Can you pinpoint every known, known error & then observe the 'true' measurement of things knowing that or does the +/- give you the cushion that caters for the known errors?

Thanks @swansont It seems that eventually a lot of normal distribution comes down to radioactive decay. Fascinating. So radioactive decay seen as both systematic & random errors, is that right?. Is all known matter radioactive, does everything lose heat & what does heat become?. In saying that, would this mean that any measurement of radioactive matter, will always have an random error due to random radioactive decay among possible other things?.

Thanks @exchemist for the wiki link, that was useful. So no matter what, interaction always causes the measurement to be slightly different. If I measured a proton 100 times & they each correctly measured the proton within +/- How many of those correctly measured within +/- are the same as each other? And how many times does that occur within those 100 measurements? If I were to label each measurement of that proton from 1-100 & then group up the measurements that were exactly the same within that 100, could I expect to see something like the following? 1, 3, 96, 98 23, 45, 75, 89 13, 21, 37, 79 11, 17, 19, 24 ... Hope that makes sense. The numbers/symbols are random, I could have chosen any four to illustrate or even letters. It's the grouping/patterns that I'm curious about.

Maybe a week & a half ago I was reading another thread someone mentioned The Big Crunch in the same conversation as pre bb iirc. So I looked it up & found that The Big Freeze & The Big Bounce also exist as hypothetical scenarios for the universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bounce I was led to write something very similar to this over a year ago. I had not heard of this until someone spoke of the big crunch a week or so ago. You won't see that part of my so called idea anywhere, I only posted the initial part of it which led me on to (amongst other things) something very similar to The Big Bounce. What good is this? Not a lot I guess, I can't write the math & what I do write doesn't make sense sometimes or comes across badly. So maybe I should look for things & ask questions instead & see where that leads. So question then please. When a particle is measured, is the measurement precisely the same when measured nth times?

The poems I post here are ones I make up, I haven't taken them from anywhere. I'll stop if it seems like I'm hogging or spamming this section. Please let me know if I am. On from that, here is another I just finished. @TheVat might appreciate the ending. Blonde It buzzed into life, the virtual pc, As the captain gave orders & yells with great glee, Her team all obey, her wish is their life, Do not mess around with your beautiful wife! For yes, she was married, to the ship & it's crew, Their culture allowed it, they thrived & they grew, And now it was her turn, her turn indeed, As she viewed all the data the screen did her feed. Their ship was an old one, strong, tested & tried, They'd flown it before & yes! no one had died, Trust it they did, with their lives & elation, As their ship readied up to leave the space station. Their ship then undocked & it swayed to & fro, It's couplings they hissed, spat & twanged, then let go, Their mysterious host, a blanket of gas & dust, Their faces entrenched with curious gust. Time traveled with them, helping you might say, For surely without time, would not everything 'decay'?, Sling shots & comets, rogue planets & stars, Velocity slowed as they approached a red Mars. They popped over to Earth, didn't like what they saw, Too many conflicts, way way too much war..., So back out they spin, more light years to roam, A heliosphere to embrace & make home. On the ship was an alien, stood proud & tall, She led by example, a captain trusted by all, Planet X is her home, it's orbit obscene, It's pastures once graced by a forest of green. So now her race venture, traverse far & wide, A future dependant on the crew & their bride, Their ship is quite scarce, not known for being hoarders, The crew stood & listened as their captain gave orders, "Outwards & on through yon stars & beyond", The captains reflection portrayed her as blonde.

A sentence that describes so much. That would make a good signature I think.

The dawn alights with the hope it might bring, A new day, a new start, a chance to improve things, What can we change, what should we do, I can't answer that question for you, But as humans we move, through time & through space, Maybe one day we'll create a better place, Until then I guess, we can all try a bit harder, So try to be nice & polite, not riddled with guarder, Our society seems troubled, fraught with frustration, Perhaps for now, this is merely the gestation, So be nice if you can, be cool & show your gums, Because no matter happens, tomorrow still comes.

A wise person once posted the following to me. Welcome back the ghost of Bishop Berkely. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Berkeley It's might be interesting to you.

It is seemingly quite odd, where do these ideas, thoughts come from? What is it that inspires this sort of ability to see things. It would seem that I have also described something quite similar to an article I just read. Idk how credible this article is, it's a mail story so hmm... it's still very odd that I was able to see this almost the same way as her. Here is what I wrote in the other thread "Personal Gravity Field We all have our own gravity field. Our perosnal gravity fields are unique to each of us due to our overall physical vibration which is in turn made up of all the diffferent organs, cells, molecules, food, drink, damage etc. We merge quantumly with other gravity fields (other people, items, gases, liquids on a quantum level. When our vibration/gravity field meets a similar/harmonic vibration/gravity field, we are attracted to it. Could this be why we find people attractive. The opposite would also seem to be true." Here is a link to the article. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15325395/theory-consciousness-near-death-experience.html And the lady herself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Str%C3%B8mme

With the help of reflection, I now have a different take on what I perceived at the time to be an idea. I tried to explain it as some of you will be aware & even show it's existence. I have described some things really bad, I didn't have the words or knowledge. My current view is this, I didn't have any sort of idea at all. I haven't discovered anything. I wonder if I've merely 'seen' something/s physics already has a theory or theories for & it is just extremely strange. I don't mean everything in the physics world, just an angstrom snippet if you will. For back up, I refer to my very first post in another thread: https://scienceforums.net/topic/134685-1-sub-quantum-echo-particlessqeps-sub-quantum-echo-particle-kinetic-resonance-flux/ Disregarding completely the particle I tried to see, at the very least, could my bad description not be thought of as having loosely described Boundary Conditions, States, Systems, Quantum Tunneling, Zero Point Energy & maybe at a stretch something loosely similar to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect There are 2 ways of perceiving what I'm saying I guess . I ended up referring to something in that thread, that I thought of as everything, everywhere, always has been, always will be. Then I found about this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy The Zero Point Energy Field Have you, the experts here, encountered other people who have seen scientific theories, explained in their own odd way of describing it. Descriptions that were close enough for you to see a little substance in them. Have you, yourselves had an insight into something in your own lives that was a little surreal?