HawkII

I had a new thought about all this. It could very well be a, close as you can get to a perpetual motion machine. The slightest Breeze might kick start a Cyclone. The air it pushes out feeding back into it self.

This solves itself then. A full rotation inside a regular Fan would be equal to lots of full rotations inside a Micro-fan.

It was after 10 hours or so after reading your Post that I came up with the responce. I didn't read your post then have the counter point immediately.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh but; At such a small size, there would be less to blow.

I'm starting to feel like I've missunderstood how this Forum works. Like I'm supposed to only ask questions people already have the answer to AND OR Propose new things (such as Microscopic Fans) with details, for it to be scrutinised.

Okay cool. I was afraid this was going to happen. I'm more interested in how feasable Microscopic Fans are in general. Edit: I already have a Cooling Pad, It's made my life better.

I was thinking about the Fan on my Laptop. It goes *Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr* when I play a game on it. I was wondering how it could be quieter. I remembered Dyson's Bladeless Air Fan, but that's patented. I got stuck thinking about this for a couple of days. I saw SpaceX's Starships have Microscopic grooves all over itself. I also saw that they are 3D Printed. It finally came to me; What if....... the same area of the one Fan.......... was replaced with............... 3D Printed Microscopic Fans........ Occupying the same sapce instead.

But that's the most exciting part. In a Double-Slit experiment, conventional wisdom tells us it knows it's being observed.

This short animation shows how one type of hologram (transmission holograms) is created using lasers, lenses, and holographic film. Once the Mushroom is removed, the film inside the Glass retains the 3D image of the Mushroom. Even when you move your head up and down. Edit:- As in; You could lift the Glass off the Table and the (Removed) Mushroom can still be seen.

Now; What on Earth would happen if this was done on an ongoing Double-Slit experiment apparatus?

Get a Space Satellite Put a Liquid Argon Detector inside of it Have that Orbit the Sun

It's about the outcome, if more energy can be harnessed then going in, then it's worth doing.

Take it one step further. Have a Cloud generator machine in the Air generate Cumulonimbus clouds. Then, absorb the Lightning somehow.

Mine will be a Stealth Suit for the Working Class's Price Range.

I thought of an improvement. The 360 Degree camera will have Eyelids made of two way glass which will blink. This will solve Insects standing on the spherical Lens.

Apparatus Full body Green Morph Suit Green Screen Cape 360 Degree Camera on top Operational The 360 degree Camera records Live footage at 60 frames per second It projects the Live feed to the Green Screen Cape Front of Camera projects to the back of the cape, back of the Camera projects to the front of the cape

Never heard of them.

What are you gonna do with the 120 million yen? 1.1 The Collatz Conjecture: A Famous Unsolved Problem A Japanese company has offered a prize of 120 million yen for its solution.

3D Shadows of 4th Spatial Dimension Space-TIme Cubes https://www.vrham.de/en/quantum-tesseract/

Oh my goshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh It's Gravity isn't it!!!!!!!!!!! Space-time is cubical. Gravity is outside our dimension which then folds Space-Time insideout.

Mr Mr Mr. Take a leaf out of Salvador Dalí's Book. Leave Time at the decontamination shower. All I'm interested in, is w, x, y, z. Interestingly enough, I watched a Netflix documentary about Oragami, there was a quote on there that I liked. 'Each fold is a new memory'

Mr Mr Mr. I appreciate that you are referring to Time. However; I Am only concerned with the Spatial Dimension. The second quote is me agreeing with you. Salvador Dalí is keeping this Thread highbrow.

I have found the word, Folding. The Tesseract is a folded inside out 3D Omnidirectional Cross shape. Crucifixion (Corpus Hypercubus) https://thesciencespace.quora.com/The-shadow-of-3D-object-is-2D-then-is-the-shadow-of-4D-object-is-3D-Why-or-why-not Ok

The Tesseract Net only becomes a Tesseract once it is turned inside out. Edit: I found this then thought I'd share it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercubane

4th dimension (Inside out Dimension) '4D objects cast 3D shadows when observed' Well naturally if observed, an inside out object casts a 3D shadow. 'Quantum tunneling, Electron gains more energy, couples with an Electrons in a higher energy orbit, then emitts a Photon as it goes back down to its original orbit.' Now; If you think of this Electron as expressing its Volume outwardly, the more energy it has, the more Volume it has, which means it's technically INSIDE the Electon in the higher orbit. The Photon emitted is equivalent to it coming OUT from the Electron in the higher orbit. Eureka! I was thinking on it then out of nowhere I came up with something that can be tested. Right now as I type this I do not know the answer, I have yet to even look into it. Do Quantumly entangled particles emit virtual Photons after they become unentangled? I predict that they do. I predict this as I now believe that they are VIRTUALLY INSIDE eachother. Then they VIRTUALLY come OUT from eachother.