MJ kihara

.....jet of particles after tearing of Higgs fields(mass) after an equal amount of energy has been applied during particles collision...this is possible as shown in the elementary structure below... in this case as shown in the diagram above particles gain mass when Higgs field interact with spacetime fabric,,the diagram is a 2D representation of otherwise what is spherical bubble like structure,the Higgs fields emanate from photon surface as virtual particle are emitted. at neutrino surface the fields are weakly forming thus forming "primordial Higgs fields",hence the small mass of neutrino. As shown in the structure this fields protrude from the surface of of elementary particles interacting with spacetime fabric therefore it generates mass by dragging it generating resistance to movement that appear as mass. The protrusion is minimum at neutrino and increases up the hierarchy up to Higg boson. How those boundary,levels,surface develops is shown as illustrated in the following diagram

From the experiments of particle colliders..a jet of particles are released as energy is transformed to mass... according to model represented by the diagram there is redefinition of energy and mass so that....the particles are always there and energy has to cause tearing for the particles to be released in a manner consistent with Energy being equal to mass multiplied by speed of light squared(Einstein's formular) Energy is continuously produced at emptiness consciouness boundary...which is detected as dark energy powering continued expansion of the universe as it elvoves.

Matter why is it there is more matter than anti matter in the current universe?.. Radiation why does a single photon interfere with itself when made to pass through double slit?.. Space where did it come from? Time what causes twin paradox and why? Does a straw man allowed to come with hypothesis...esp one that appear to address the previously asked questions?

When there is no data to support either,is there one of it that is more correct than the other? When you start speculating do you start from the unknown to the known? Or from the known to the unknown? Because in this case have tried either. Where did energy come from? Am asking this because that was my starting point of speculation.

Can you consider hypothesis as speculation?

Where did matter and radiation come from?

It's concluded its false based on already what is established as the truth...then what was in Bing bang hot and dense point? During the inflation phase of big bang what was causing the inflation? If the metrics of spacetime was changing,where the metrics of spacetime come from? What is you believe in this, who and what caused big bang?(on the issue of uncomfortable) I suggest those are the points that made me land on speculations. Why then can't i go on speculating,then when am done examine the results of speculation. If thinking is wrong,in this case thinking wrongly or correctly,what about dreaming.

Am not insisting that am correct only that am stuck far away from the points that will show how correct my arguments are...for instance about the virtual particles....I haven't moved even to a point of saying how useful is this....the reason am not changing some of the statements like consciousness was concentrated at that point in the beginning is that .....they will support my arguments up the diagram....I understand it might be a shaky foundation...if it's not strong enough it will come down crumbling...I wish I was given that chance...to continue up the diagram.the next thread and that thing in the trash can all are related but they won't make a meaning on their own. That diagram is not refuting big bang it's just trying to show what might have been at that particular time of hot and dense point...saying that it is patently false, then what is the truth?

Am not getting it.....am in speculation section and am stuck...having been stopped not to continue speculating.... science make progress when uncomfortable issues are discussed.

Thanks for feynman lectures... It's also clear to me when people don't understand things they infer to angels..

They are both living in Earth..one goes to a distant star come back her sister has aged let's say 30years older the sister decide to live her younger on Earth and goes to an even far away star and later come back then she find her younger sister even much older than her.... biologically let's say their life span on Earth is 80 years....if they keep doing that will they not be cheating natural laws to prolong their life if finally they dicide to move together to another even further star and stay there. Shouldn't phyical laws have fiscal physical impact...or otherwise if they are correct shouldn't they have reinterpretation to fit physical impact..which in this case includes biological activities.

Once again i av said the universe was made up of consciousness....I am a single conscious humanbeing...happened to be on that universe.... that's beyond my understanding.....from this thread there is a place I mentioned....an exciting new age of exploration is a head of us... exploring the universe...maybe the urge to answer that question will drive us to that. Given what humans keep discovering,mathematical formulas and constants that....some of which appear even to have no meaning to our current situation... limited by human current understanding... It's safe to answer that question by saying it's beyond my understanding...the diagram(model) takes emptiness and consciouness to be fundamental. NO...I don't have an answer to that. Am not creating crap as I type...it's a whole model that has been created .. in coperating consciousness,dark energy,dark matter,standard model particles, structure of elementary particles,three forces of nature,Higgs field,gravitation,shapes of Galaxies, cosmic voids and cosmic webs and the final conclusion universe is conscious. 'dance' catchy phrase to make science accessible to everyone... anyway...it's the activities taking place at the boundary...for those who like music it's the string vibrations (boundary activities) producing sound (virtual particles).. If it it was thinking then we are in it's thinking..an in such a case by limiting free thinking we are trapped in it's thinking...it being a being it's a description then it's manipulating us to make us take it as such...all of this is information predated by consciousness.....we need more exploration....more harvesting information from it...which is embedded on virtual particles... that make up spacetime fabric...that make up the universe....we need more exploration to have a clue ... Therefore I can't claim anything of that sort....I was born at this era where what we are discussing is based so far with the knowledge that is currently available....but what I can claim is that we need more exploration...so as to answer your question..which so far it's beyond me. Pliz...phi for all unlock my next thread...

This paragraph will be given further clarification when I show how structures of matter start forming out of the process discussed in this thread. Surely here am dealing with consciousness and emptiness 'dance'....having a meaning of either means you have a meaning for all...this is beyond our understanding.... there was a time when we thought vacuum is empty only to realize it's so active full of quantum fluctuations and having enormous amount of energy (zero point energy)... In this situation empty is that which we can't describe,it's limited to the furthest we can go to describing dimensions......as far as we realize new dimensions from our current understanding then that belongs to the consciousness.

The twin paradox...once they start a conversation about the age of the universe, will they agree on the years?

It has remained to be the same up to now...only its concentration,saturation,'hue' changes at the boundary with emptiness as the universe evolves and expand...it's thickness reduces as more virtual particles are formed...this means all the virtual particles in the universe making spacetime fabric.....their total consciousness is the same to that of big bang starting point. It also appears that it's thickness at the boundary affect the rate at which virtual particles are produced as indicated by the uptick of universe expansion.

Consciousness...I think it existed prior to the early universe,according to the diagram the hot dense point of big bang was consciousness where it's properties were maximumly saturated,for big bang those properties are hot and dense....by this time consciousness had started warping emptiness and virtual particles carrying information about hottness and density. At the boundary of emptiness-consciousness, consciousness concentration was reducing as more virtual particles were produced,the formed virtual particles,which in this case are bubble like had their own emptiness - consciousness boundary the same process kept repeating it's self as Spacetime fabric was being created- this is the inflation phase of big bang at this point Spacetime fabric was made up of virtual particles,the properties of the virtual particles became metric of universe spacetime fabric...I think fabric is most appropriate term,as the process continued quark were for during quark quark epoch...of course there is big bang theory to explain this. The continued current expansion of the universe,goes on, since the same process of warping and unwarping at consciousness emptiness is still going on...that's what I wanted to continue in the next thread. Why i think consciousness existed at eary universe is because present universe evolved from it,in the present universe we are living in,we are conscious human beings and at quantum level wave function collapse takes place...given time to go on describing my concepts and diagrams I will explain how wave function collapse is a feedback information mechanism between what's goes on in spacetime fabric and at individual's virtual particle emptiness-consciousness boundary. Consciousness hue...i could not use chroma or shade because consciousness is not colour... but of course color is information ....and earlier on I said any information available in the universe is generated by consciousness. I saw it fit to use hue cause it's closer to what I meant... greatest out put at a given....in this case consciousness properties were maximumly saturated/concentrated at start of big bang.. at that particular point...later as the universe evolved at every point in time.. the saturation extent/ concentration changes at the emptiness-consciousness boundary inside the virtual particle. This change in saturation and concentration of consciousness at the boundary is the one am using hue to refer at,the change occur as the universe evolves.

Isn't time I go to the 'warping and unwarping-consciousness dominate' so that we see how consciousness emptiness interplay lead to dark matter,dark energy and emergent of other elementary particles,this will help me review the arrows and circles on-neutrino oscillation and z boson as I go up the diagram. To the moderator.

I'm not refuting the models that have been developed...I look at their mathematics enviously,but l just want away of explaining it to a layman's,to make it more accessible to everyone from where someone can move on and refine the language.anyway when I look at the rotation curves of Galaxy and Galaxy shapes then have something that happens to explain that,the same concept helps me understand electrodynamics,helps me understand wave function collapse..and goes further to tell me that gravity is not just a force of attraction between mass, and Spacetime time curvature influence but it's deeper to exchange of information through entanglement.isn't that great? It's all about explaining what has been already established in an alternative way then adding something to make the science wheel keep rolling. Mainstream science am not against it,,,the problem is that I have not been polished to use it's terms efficiently...but am trying to use terms in a manner that they won't lose meaning..and where I lack terms,I use what is closer. e.g consciousness hue...i saw it appropriate,hue, to describe the extent..that reduces overtime as it spread,however the overall content remains the same.

please please don't do that.....hhhh...oo.... my..am 🙈... its a whole big issue up to wave function collapse ,spacetime curvature to cosmic filaments,cosmic web.I was told to take baby step,,,it might be gibberish to some,but don't cut my legs,if i get stuck up on consciousness i won't move anyway,being thrown to the trash bin,its too much,without that how can i explain spacetime curvature using the concepts being displayed on the diagram,i think if i was given time the whole idea will emerge...short of words...u could have tolerated plain language,just for a while till am done,then someone reformulate it using proper science terms and jargon. they is follow up concepts and diagrams that could have helped me settle this thorny uncomfortable thing that many fear going near it or even handle just a bit of it...its good if i was looked at, as a straw man looking for away.the problem is that they are major issues to deserve a topic but they are interrelated. after the full picture emerge i could have been asked for clarification....i just posses plain language, am ...i don't know

gate keeper....gravitation my off springs.

warping and unwrapping consciousness dominate...at least we exist, conscious human beings.

There issues here to clarify virtual particles, are not the 'conventional virtual particles' or virtual photons' those ones will be tackled on electrodynamics as derived from the diagram,in this case it arises from containment of emptiness by consciousness,meaning that once it disintergrate the two(consciousness and emptiness ) part ways and since consciousness is everywhere it travel almost instantly,as what happened during big bang..the inflation thing...'consciouness concentration hue diffusion'. This fact is critical when wave function collapse takes place. Filter my typos,my editor goes nuts sometimes. I feel it's time to go further on clarification.

The virtual particles outlined in the diagram,moves at the speed of light.unless they disintergrate and they fall back to the source...here I escape the 'ether' thing,no forces are being transferred magically.

When I was doing this 'the diagram thing' and relating it to other things to get the whole picture....I was surprised about the contradictions...' I know I exist because there is no existence' only to find out that a century ago there was discussions about the same,during formulation of set mathematics,the issue about Empty set,the Russell paradox..only to see that the paradox was there because they could not put consciousness and emptiness into the arguments.

Who? Or what ? Are words used by you to pass information to me in form of a question,you expecting an answer. That 'information' is predated by consciousness and emptiness.How can I answer about that? We talk of emptiness...using a word empty...that which we don't know about...what is it? But there is a word for it.in my case consciousness is synonymous with existence,and I happen to exist because I know there is no existence (emptiness).from that diagram consciousness and emptiness is fundamental.we know of consciousness cause we happened to be conscious. The question should be how does that lead to Spacetime fabric,dark energy,dark matter,normal matter and the four fundamental forces of the universe.