MJ kihara

....mumbo jumbo...you came late in the thread i wonder if you have gone through the discussions...I wonder if you have read the links that i have sent...what your doing is not mainstream....you look alot at the semantics rather than ideas especially when it's beyond your imagination....do you have idea what assumptions are in any case....virtual particles being too small to be subjected under principle of uncertainty.... Let's do this simple experiment to settle this....(I won't let you trash this thread)... Can you pliz make up your own statements here so that we see how they morph into those diagrams I have posted?.....or otherwise can you come up with a simple diagram to illustrate what a quark is to an uneducated layman... without plagiarising others ideas? What you are doing is defending status quo of knowledge gatekeeping. you can't see back up when already you have a notion. Anyway ✋🤗😊 am done. Clarification the above post is for...

.....mmmmm.....😴... It's clear the weight on my shoulders on this issues it's too heavy...trying to dare the undarable...since I know the next step is to be locked... Concerning this thread let wait for the evidence to stream in the near/far future...Am waiting for the Improvements on the AI programs to be able to feed it my ideas, imaginations and diagrams and Chun out formulars and mathematics ....at the rate at which things are happening going with the recent news articles concerning AI achievements it may end up to be earlier than expected....I wonder if they will come a day when professional papers will be published by the same AI to the point sites like this forum will invite humans to just speculate anything.. which may be wrong,correct,silly,word salads e.t.c, e.t.c anything... This links containing recent research maybe useful to change the perception; 1-"Astrophysicists reveal the nature of dark matter through the study of crinkles in spacetime." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 25 April 2023. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230425111243.htm>. 2-https://www.google.com/url?q=https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/APR23/Session/M08.1&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi9kdf_lo7_AhXH-qQKHWxfCuwQFnoECAsQAg&usg=AOvVaw1erDW-TP6-bHzj-aq4NQJc 3-https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/world/webb-telescope-massive-early-galaxies-scn/index.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiqhNyFmI7_AhVN3qQKHRu_As0QFnoECAUQAg&usg=AOvVaw1icyN0c0-4PpokoorY6dOI These are research done by respectable organisations that point to the fact we need to rethink...those diagrams helps me understand these observations....they are a design that should be followed by math....first part is design...and of course by reasoning and imagination....instead of putting lots of salads here, let us see your designs and imaginations without repetitions and plagiarism...before you dismiss other people ideas.

Are there mathematics in quantum mechanics,QFT or cosmology describing the blackhole singularity? The virtual particles am referring to are spacetime particles....I chose virtual because they are Soo tiny that being virtual is the correct to discribe them. The conventional virtual particles and virtual photons,I explain their source and properties according to electrodynamics as derived from this concept,which I haven't yet talked about them here. The concept of invariance of light speed is critical and standard in physics....in this concept there issues concerning that,based on the nature of spacetime particles...this may explain why alot of people have difficulties comprehending those diagrams..i.e some particles may move FTL in a manner not to violate SR and GR,synonymously to how wave function collapse happens. You haven't talked about this question.

Refuting those diagrams is same as saying the Up quark charge is not +2/3 and down quark charge is not -1/3..the foundation of standard model. Anyway...just a question from your understanding- 1-Are there particles/fields that move FTL? Yes/No 2-If there happened to exist could you change your interpretation of facts? Yes/No

The diagrams and descriptions is for the illustration purposes...otherwise the majority of mathematical aspects have already been developed....the math from the diagram that I have, just reproduces Newton laws of gravity then I try relating it to entanglement and relating it to information exchange,deriving E=MC^2 in easiest way for a layman,simple Fourier transformation to relate weak boson with the structures shown in diagram that leads to Mexican hat shaped structure for higgs boson and graviton as standing wave on elementary particles...the other math is introducing EFE components as shown in the initial diagrams in this thread....am not well versed with other complicated math concepts. Those diagrams were derived from simple mathematics of beta emissions, using Feynman diagrams for beta emissions for guidance purposes. I have just those simple math and illustrations...it's only that I saw what am doing to be able to explain all these concepts to a layman before The AI develops to the level of making human intelligence trivial is leading to something wonderful....thats why i entered to this forum. Not to be rude...i think we should just accept our brains are limited to the extended to which we can carry out mathematical operations...some of which require infinite time on human level,that should be carried out by quantum supercomputers...let us and especially in this forum be on the right side of history,that we are entering into an era where pure human reasoning and imagination are importantly required and that the supercomputers are there to crunch the data and do formulations and simulations to sieve our reasoning and imaginations to identify the most viable and useful ones for the exploration of the Universe.

😂 ....i can't fully dismiss your statement.. 'observing nothing'...Just follow the link...isn't that incomprehensible....it's science.

Therefore,when an object/particle goes past the event horizon it will follow a knot worldline and be trapped in these endless worldline...as the pressure and gravitation energy increases towards the blackhole singularity the knot tighten more....leading to formation of gravitons....since the standing wave on elementary particles no longer decays/decouples...moving forward as the knot tightens more it start fusing(the knot merges) ,then the reverse of universe expansion takes place...as illustrated in the the following diagram inwardly; the collapse will happen in reverse whereby higgs fields collapses to top quark...then to leptons.... then to neutrinos to photons...then up to dark photons and dark matter...these will then stabilise the blackhole at the centre,however, as the pressure overwhelmingly increases...the spacetime particles aka virtual particles will start to disintergrate and fall back to singularity as consciousness as illustrated in the diagram; disintergration of spacetime particles aka virtual particles back to consciousness will be favoured towards the core of blackhole.... THEREFORE AT BLACKHOLE SINGULARITY ITS JUST CONSCIOUSNESS PRESENT. Semantics. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/APR23/Session/M08.1&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwizn4ybkoz_AhXQdqQEHfAEBzMQFnoECAcQAg&usg=AOvVaw3TiEqrUfw7vxue_raPUeJ1 If you doubt my concepts follow the link...🤩... blackhole is observing.

ILet have a thought experiment,the simplest gravitational wave after graviton decays/decouples from elementary particles will consist of single virtual particles aka spacetime particles interwoven through entanglement via their eigen space... remember this entanglement reduces with reduction of concentration of interwoven virtual particles aka spacetime particles and increase in degree of freedom away from emissions source, where eventually after reaching the highest degree of freedom the virtual particles dilutes to become spacetime fabric. Let's take the basic gravitational wave formed initially as a thread( fibre consisting of interwoven virtual particles aka spacetime particles). Therefore,on top of elementary particles there will be 'threads' spinning out at to less than Planck's time...when elementary particles aggragate(through strong force and other mechanism) the standing waves will undergo constructive interference i.e the 'threads' will get interwoven and entangle more...this happens in tandem with increase in mass. From earlier discussions this 'thread' will become the worldline that the hypothetical object(object without gravitational influence) will follow as it free fall towards mass. Let have a massive body at the verge of collapsing into a blackhole,As the mass was additively becoming massive so were the 'threads' (weak gravitational waves) entangling and getting interwoven to become 'ropes'(strong gravitational waves)...these 'Ropes' entangled to give the event horizon....while under the influence of the massive gravitational forces forming the 'ropes' collapses on themselves to form knot/knots. Therefore,the blackhole becomes a Knot. Remember it's a thought experiments....where imagination matters.

The concept here in is critical in understanding of blackhole formation.

😎.....that is the explanation,very correct.....I have just explained exactly about that according to the concepts that are outlined in the diagrams.....just look at my answer again, it's even going deeper by answering the Why? Why? Why? questions. And for verification purposes and showing prediction power of the concept outlined......at barycenter or it's periphery of massive bodies e.g blackholes,neutron star system e.t.c particles are expected to be formed that should be detectable,also mini blackholes can form in extreme cases...in this era of JWT telescope I expect with time data will become available that will verify the concept.

I welcome you to tell me about the ingredients..what are they?

Am going a long with the questions your are asking me otherwise I could have stuck with the diagrams....another point to earlier discussion the wave also represent normalizing constant. As per the concept in the diagram, remember that moon- is not hypothetical object- is mass source, therefore it will free fall towards Earth and Earth free fall towards it in an ideal situation...as their two waves forms collapse at the barycenter of their system generating a new wave form with it's EFE component of the system (Earth-moon system). However,the barycenter of the system wobbles alot due to the fluidity of Earth oceans inducing slight movements of mass(of course ocean mass which is part of Earth Mass)..these instabilities in the barycenter causes the wave function not to collapse perfectly,inducing delays in collapse,that time delay, creates a window that leads to constructive interference between moon g waves(as indicated in the diagram) and Earth g waves(as indicated in the diagram) leading to transfer of energy to the moon increasing it's energy density. From the diagram, energy density is conjugate variable of momentum density which inturn is conjugate to momentum flux,therefore,increase in moons energy density leads to decrease in its momentum density leading to increase in momentum flux of the moon making moon to drift away from the Earth.

You can't dismiss it as wrong....your not aware of what am doing or am not getting what you are saying...like for instance tell me the error your talking about..there is a big difference between being incorrect and being wrong...there are a lot of original concepts am bringing e.g saturation of Higgs field ....the concept you want to dismiss unites strong force,weak force, electromagnetic force and gravitation...it's unfortunate to dismiss concepts for the mere fact of being incomprehensible.

You will take the two diagram and let them meet in this case one mass will be Earth(with it's EFE components) the other mass will be Moon....where their respective wave meet their will be a wave function collapse that point becomes barycenter of the two object,at such a point a new wave I will be generated containing the EFE component describing the two system...in case of Earth and moon they are not the only two in space...they are part of the solar system , therefore, other objects sun, Venus,Mercury, Mars e.t.c thier EFE components as indicated on diagram collapses at the solar system barycenter where new wave with its EFE components is generated that describes the solar system...taking all that into consideration it will be clear why the moon goes around the Earth at the same time it's drifting away from it. Am considering them as indicated on the diagram...in pairs.. putting in mind that the diagrams indicates a smooth transition from source of mass itself,quantum realm..( elementary particle,Higgs field,graviton, gravitational wave.. ) to massive objects, classical realm where either an object is on a certain position or it's not there.

What about if you take momentum density,energy flux and energy density,momentum flux to be complex conjugate and that their probability always equals one indicating position with certainty of an object moving towards mass?

From the same Wikipedia article, Anyway I mean the length as outlined on the diagram...I settle with the following explanation for simplicity sake, 🤔 You see too far...just looking for the easiest explanation...to be palatable to the majority without strong scientific background...+1.

From the Wikipedia geodesic article....... For a space-like geodesic through two events, there are always nearby curves which go through the two events that have either a longer or a shorter proper length than the geodesic, even in Minkowski space. In Minkowski space, the geodesic will be a straight line. Any curve that differs from the geodesic purely spatially (i.e. does not change the time coordinate) in any inertial frame of reference will have a longer proper length than the geodesic, but a curve that differs from the geodesic purely temporally (i.e. does not change the space coordinates) in such a frame of reference will have a shorter proper length..... In my case it's proper length as distance and co-ordinate time(across metric tensor line as per the diagram) as time...for every unit of time there is increase of proper length towards mass.

Thanks for the corrections. let me correct on that by dropping geodesic therefore it becomes..... indicating the path followed by the object as indicated in the diagram..... I mean literally someone to put units of time from point B to A using metric tensor line as time axis then literally measure the arc length,then let the object to freefall from point A to B near source of mass...it's obvious that speed will be increasing towards mass, since per unit time length/distance is increasing...as indicated on the diagram. The arc length in this case is the surface of wave that becomes world line of the object as it free fall towards mass. Remember its simple explanation using the minimum possible detail.

In these case the freefalling object is moving from point A to point B near source of mass...it's not stationary therefore the events are not in same place....the wave surface become the geodesic path/ the world line/arc length that the object is free falling in i.e its the object orbit towards mass. Literally distance becomes the arc length of the wave....and since near mass the frequency of gravitation wave is high the arc length will be longer.for us human this length becomes invisible but we detect it as increase in velocity.

Instead of copy pasting formulations that have already been developed,I would prefer discussing concepts that I regard original from my arguments point of view and just make a reference to any formulations where possible not to cloud this thread..esp with paste that are not clear...for the above post that's clear...Google Wikipedia Schrodinger equations- position space and momentum space. My intention is to develop something that even a layman can interpret easily,for instance,if someone ask me about spacetime curvature and how it's related to gravity..I show that diagram...If he ask how it's related to increase in speed toward massive body I answer Speed=distance/time. Where distance is the arc length on wave indicating geodesic path as indicated in the diagram while time axis is fixed on the metric tensor.

I think applying the merged EFE on gravitation wave as shown in the diagram and using that information to look for solutions following Schrodinger equations. From Wikipedia-schrodinger equations......Writing r {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} } for a three-dimensional position vector and p {\displaystyle \mathbf {p} } for a three-dimensional momentum vector, the position-space Schrödinger equation is i ℏ ∂ ∂ t Ψ ( r , t ) = − ℏ 2 2 m ∇ 2 Ψ ( r , t ) + V ( r ) Ψ ( r , t ) . {\displaystyle i\hbar {\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\Psi (\mathbf {r} ,t)=-{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2m}}\nabla ^{2}\Psi (\mathbf {r} ,t)+V(\mathbf {r} )\Psi (\mathbf {r} ,t).} The momentum-space counterpart involves the Fourier transforms of the wave function and the potential: i ℏ ∂ ∂ t Ψ ~ ( p , t ) = p 2 2 m Ψ ~ ( p , t ) + ( 2 π ℏ ) − 3 / 2 ∫ d 3 p ′ V ~ ( p − p ′ ) Ψ ~ ( p ′ , t ) . {\displaystyle i\hbar {\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\tilde {\Psi }}(\mathbf {p} ,t)={\frac {\mathbf {p} ^{2}}{2m}}{\tilde {\Psi }}(\mathbf {p} ,t)+(2\pi \hbar )^{-3/2}\int d^{3}\mathbf {p} '\,{\tilde {V}}(\mathbf {p} -\mathbf {p} '){\tilde {\Psi }}(\mathbf {p} ',t).} The functions Ψ ( r , t ) {\displaystyle \Psi (\mathbf {r} ,t)} and Ψ ~ ( p , t ) {\displaystyle {\tilde {\Psi }}(\mathbf {p} ,t)} are derived from | Ψ ( t ) 〉 {\displaystyle |\Psi (t)\rangle } by Ψ ( r , t ) = 〈 r | Ψ ( t ) 〉 , {\displaystyle \Psi (\mathbf {r} ,t)=\langle \mathbf {r} |\Psi (t)\rangle ,} Ψ ~ ( p , t ) = 〈 p | Ψ ( t ) 〉 , {\displaystyle {\tilde {\Psi }}(\mathbf {p} ,t)=\langle \mathbf {p} |\Psi (t)\rangle ,} where | r 〉 {\displaystyle |\mathbf {r} \rangle } and | p 〉 {\displaystyle |\mathbf {p} \rangle } do not belong to the Hilbert space itself, but have well-defined inner products with all elements of that space...... The best thing is that most of formulations to support this concepts have already been done.

Thanks, Given the way you have answered my questions; 6&7. About FTL particles and Transition from single cell to multicellular organism...I feel that my concepts and yours have clear distinctions. I published my concepts a month earlier than you,after working for the concepts for a while..my devices I think were bugged for sometimes given the type of glitches I encountered while looking for info in the internet. My math background is not as strong as such, I rely on pure reasoning, following just simple scientific principles as my rail guard.I feared someone with strong math can easily decipher what am doing and formulate that without even attributing me anywhere. Your closer to what I have been doing but I feel am in a deeper layer.....the funny thing is your talking of Terminator A.I and monstrous aliens and am dealing with how to hide in spacetime fabric when such thing as you mention will ever appear.

Just for clarification,Can you briefly explain an overview of how this happens?.... especially the transition part.

Just a few questions concerning your model being a theory of Everything;Yes/No 1-Does you model describe what a photons is composed of? 2-Does your model describe precisely how gravity creates light in a manner that a layman can understand? 3-Does your model explained clearly the rotation curve of the Galaxy?? 4-Does you model desscribe the conditions that might be inside a black hole? 5-Does you model explained the conditions after big bang, given recent research that there could have been massive galaxies a few millions years after big bang? 6-Does you model acknowledge FTL particles? 7-Does your model reconcile physics ideas with the laws of evolution(biology) i.e what leads to evolution?

From those diagrams there are already assumptions made-spacetime fabric is made up of virtual particles (spacetime particles) which can either be stable, partially stable or unstable... partially stable or unstable oscillate within their levels of instability i.e a kind of ideal square wave signal. Virtual particles (spacetime particle) have a minute eigen space around them. Stable virtual particles(spacetime particles) are the ones that transist from local point to globally, therefore, essentially mediating gravity making it universal. Virtual particles(spacetime particles) entangle through their eigen space therefore entanglement strength is directly proportional to their concentration that contribute to gravity. Virtual particles(spacetime particles) surface dimension deform accordingly to where it's entangled to i.e at the surface of the particle e.g quark as it is emitted. Stable virtual particles (spacetime particle) form Higgs field when this Higgs field get saturated a graviton is formed that decouples from elementary particle as gravitational wave --This decoupling is the one that am referring to as decay--after decoupling they move to become part of spacetime fabric (basic framework of the universe). As they are moving they mediate gravity and since their concentration is higher near source of mass they are highly entangled at such a point therefore, contributing to a higher pressure (i.e virtual particles-spacetime particles-pressure)...this is the cause of gravity being analogously compared to negative pressure. Therefore, pressure increase from point A to point B near source of mass.However as virtual particles(spacetime particles) are moving away from source of mass,to become part of basic framework of the universe, their entanglement to the mass source keep reducing contributing to the cosmological constant that leads to the expansion of metric tensor..as indicated in the diagram...Therefore,we are having a situation whereby virtual particles(spacetime particles) are mediating gravity through entanglement via their minute eigen space while simultaneously contributing to cosmological constant,hence,universe expansion as they are moving from source mass to the universe. About existence of graviton--it will be very difficult to detect a graviton in particle colliders machine experiments since it decays to become part of spacetime fabric....However it's expected to be found in plenty in regions of extreme pressures as found near or inside a black hole or other massive bodies....or it could be found transciently if it were possible to synthesis microblack holes.