Everything posted by MJ kihara
-
Is FTL actually possible?
If so even Vega, supernova,Earth sending signal and vega receiving signal are free falling...if both are in a uniform gravitational fields...then STL ship as it is free falling in tandem with them, will be receiving signal from them depending on how far they are and in this case STL crew will use distance to extrapolate sequence of events therefore eliminate causality violation.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
I would like to know if STL ship is free falling or have some mechanism of propulsion? Because if it has some propulsion mechanism they will send light signal to another comoving reference point and calculate the time taken for light signal to come back given that c is known the distance will be determined...using this distance and the time they cover part of it when their ship accelerate...they will know their ship is moving at STL.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
I think They will know given the invariance of light speed and age of the universe as they will use them as a point of reference....unless they are in parallel universe where constant c and age of their universe is different.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
In that case once the STL perceives all the events..four events.. that's Step1 Vega receives a signal,step2 supernova,step3 Earth sends a signal and step4 Vega sees supernova...the STL crew will realise there is an anormaly in the sequence of events....given that they know they are moving at STL...I think they will be able to extrapolate the right sequence of events therefore causality will not have been violated.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
According to that diagram effect occur before cause for STL Ship ...look at it's space axis...I think if there is an error is from the way he obtained STL space axis it doesn't seem to be on the same space axis with Earth and Vegas. I think in science progress is brought by discussions, arguments,reexaming what you know... accepting challenges... nothing like looking stupid.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Causality and information.. just a question...if u read a book then throw it to the blackhole will you ever be able to retrieve the information in book?
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Same old problems...we may end up in cycles for another century...the foundation of our understanding about the nature of spacetime fabric....(not the rubber thing analogy or floor mat) is the one that needs to change... issues concerning, about origin of quantum and implications of lorentz factor and of course consciousness ..etc etc and finally our technological know how.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Am trying to think about neutrino...it doesn't recognize a nutshell....can you hold it.is it physical?
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Looking for away to make my thinking clearer...but I think the idea has been around. You can't try to have different results such as if causality violation is possible using the same argument that has been there for more than a century expecting different results. Some things needs modifications and readjustments.....and of course redefinition. Yes more a kin to basic framework...'pop' come first before formalization. In a nutshell what are physical things? U can't hold it..you are it, you are in it. Just for the purpose of analogy...if you dive into the ocean you find your friend the Fish...then you borrow it a cup of water where will it hold to give it to you...in these case an ocean without a floor...?
-
Is FTL actually possible?
No. It's a fluidlike fabric...one large fabric called the universe...analogy in these case will be just like water molecules are to the ocean..spacetime particles,loops, bubbles( virtual particles) are to the universe.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Its right. Space-time turning it into a thing on it's own right to become spacetime fabric.therefore..using space-time to explain/describe a thing called spacetime fabric... so that we can have a common point to merge GR and QM. Inevitable... unavoidable...you can't avoid that which has happened...others are assumptions. According to my thinking space-time emerged from spacetime fabric.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Spacetime fabric it's on the canvas fabric,it's on the cotton fibre,it's in the cotton fibre,it's on elements making up the cotton fibre,it's in the atoms,in their electrons in their proton and neutron,in their quarks... etc etc It's the fabric that make you and me and the universe we know of...it's constituent being closed loops of space and time. When we interprate it mathematically using geometry we get spacetime. 🤯..loop..encircling that's the idea... bubbles...😇
-
Is FTL actually possible?
When the neutrinos are passing through the Earth,through our bodies, through our brains as we are thinking...they are just moving through the spacetime fabric.we are physical from our perspective...but I think from neutrinos perspective we're just spacetime fabric....being physical is just qualities of spacetime fabric. Since it has already happened it's an inevitable.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
The problem is us separating ourselves from the universe...we are not different entities...we are part of the universe...the particles that make us are part of the universe....we are also spacetime fabric. And of course maybe not a major part of it...but an inevitable part of it because we exist.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Using the current models going FTL is impossible cause u keep pumping in alot of energy while warping spacetime until u get your self collapsed into a blackhole to realise you going nowhere.. wormhole and warp drive enormous energy til you wonder where to stand in the space as u make it. We need a model where energy issues are minimised and or reinterprate lorentz factor so that we redifine energy...to take into consideration of square root of a negative.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Pliz sentient is not consciousness...it's just part of consciousness. If u sent a rocket past a planet inhibited by natives whose scientific knowledge is limited and they realize the rocket is manouevrable in unpredictable manner...they will interprate it to be a conscious object....therefore consciousness is not all about feeling pain...it's about responding and making decisions. In this case the rocket will be following instructions put in it in whatever form or following commands from back here on Earth. Traveling back in time is impossible for an evolving universe..it's not(universe) stuck in time. If u move FTL 'if possible' u simply arrive a head of light....it's like two ancient warring communities one uses a donkey and the other uses a horse to sent message...the one using a horse which is faster will have an upper hand in manipulating situation..but as the message is being sent the situation in the battle field will still be evolving. The issue of backwards in time,I think comes from the idea of looking up in space and seeing the way the universe used to be earlier because light doesn't move instantaneously it take time to arrive...however where it came from is still elvoving...if we happen to move there(source of light) instantly,we will not have moved back in time,we will just get it as it is...it's present form as it's evolving...let say it was a star as we look at the telescope several billion years ago...then it happened to collapse to a blackhole that later evaporated through emission of Hawking radiation...all this as the universe is evolving then we move there instantly we will just get a spacetime fabric without a star.if the universe is elvoving uniformly (at the same rate across) then we come back home we will get things going on as usual with the time difference being equivalent with the time spend out there.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
It's not about supporting statements..it's about you asking questions intending at directing discussions in a manner that if you don't comphrend you lock someone down.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Where are you from...from nowhere to everywhere..😂 just look at my other thread.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
We are talking about FTL it could be better if the owner of this thread directs the discussion....esp when dealing with controversial questions..and esp with someone with powers to shut you up and lock you down in a blackhole cause he can't comprehend your explanations and thinking.
-
Is FTL actually possible?
Why then bother bringing us into the existence... finding ourselves asking this question. If it doesn't, it teaches us by observing it.if a supernova happens in our neighborhood star....we know what gamma ray's will do to us.it has kept record for us,what happened to the dinosaur. We know that given enough resources human can reproduce a lot to go and occupy those places..given that we are on top of animal intelligence it's incumbent upon us to figure out...how to do it(FTL).
-
Is FTL actually possible?
My thinking is it's possible and not just possible even further than it..i.e faster and further than speed of light...without violating SR and GR...the limit has been put by the already developed conventional models. I don't think we were meant for a brief existence in this solar system.
-
Jumping out of the black hole, What about the event horizon? From nowhere to everywhere.
Photon is at the transition point.... .where quantum emerge from.... as matter acquire structure within the the interlocked cloud like layer stable virtual particles while the unstable virtual particles decay/disintergrate falling back to their level of stability or further back to the source(emptiness-consciouness boundary).therefore an equilibrium situation develops...when stable virtual particles passes this level they go to the next level...the whole process repeats as different levels are formed that correspond to different particles. At photon zone as indicated in the prior structure the majority of stable virtual particles are emitted at rate of 6x10^34 particles per second...when the photon is moving in spacetime fabric these virtual particles are emitted to become part of spacetime fabric and since their surface dimension is similar to photons they form a kind of spacetime fabric superfluid. However as they are emitted to spacetime fabric the cloudlike layer interlock tighten as vibration within it reduces....as more virtual particles are formed below the layer, vibration within the cloudlike layer increases and then the interlock loosen releasing another bunch of virtual particles this oscillation is the origin of amplitue, wavelength and of course frequency of light. Dark photon virtual particle emission frequency is below this threshold..majority of virtual particle disintergrate upon release from the surface,therefore, its surface dimension is dorminated by disintergrating virtual particles. Therefore,there is shift in equilibrium of what is dorminating the surface of particles as the transition takes place from Primordial quantization to quantum formation, the initial point being the formation of photon and it's properties.
-
Jumping out of the black hole, What about the event horizon? From nowhere to everywhere.
Let me not beat the bushes,to me this diagram is excellent...maybe it's just on my head...I had to read Qm,BB,GR for several years for me to come up with this ...bt time will tell if such ideas will help someone somewhere to come up with... ideas that will help the rest of us.....if a mad person goes to the doctor....the doctor will try to diagonise symptom and try to understand the spectrum of mental illness....what about if the doctor just shout to the patient you have a demon in you!...where could progress come from in the society. In this model photon emits inverse planck's number of stable virtual particles per second that is the beginning of quantization....below this threshold it become dark photon. Virtual particles get highly entangled with it's source therefore virtual particle emitted from photon are highly entangled to it. Virtual particles emitted from particles with crests and troughs get entangled to those crest and trough to form charge....the arrows... Virtual particles dimension is similar to photons surface dimension....therefore they both move at the speed of light in spacetime fabric. Virtual particles entanglement near their source creates constraints... reducing their degree of freedom as they move up the hierarchy...this constraint give rise to Higgs field. Oscillation between highest degree of freedom and lowest degree of freedom give rise to wave nature of Higgs field. In Sea quark there are infinite oscillations in their Higgs field degree of freedom in this case I will call them vibration but collapses to three crests and three troughs that give rise to valency down quark Gravitation influence take place at virtual particle level....this involves entanglement of of virtual particles...in this case entanglement involves exchange of information....this explain why gravity is the weakest force(takes place at virtual particles level)...and it's involved both in dark matter and normal because both emit vitual particles....the constant rate of information exchange between virtual particle is given by Newton gravitational constant G.... Mass and gravity are United at Higgs fields when this fields become saturated emitting temporary graviton that decays at to less than planck's time to gravitation waves... Gravitation waves become the template of spacetime curvature...when it interact with other virtual particles making spacetime fabric....
-
Jumping out of the black hole, What about the event horizon? From nowhere to everywhere.
i will make further explanations regarding those diagrams...as the discussion proceeds.
-
Jumping out of the black hole, What about the event horizon? From nowhere to everywhere.
those surface forms from properties of virtual particles which include they can either be stable,partially stable or unstable, therefore,they develop levels of instability as they are emitted and move in spacetime fabric.therefore,surface of elementary particles consist of interlocked cloud like layer containing virtual particles transitioning within their levels of instabilities. pliz joigus i will account for them,no superstition here you should clarify to me what is superstition... as the discussion proceed its not like am drawing while thinking,while writing. the model has been developed, in one way or the other to account for that.for example if you bring those quarks in close proximity, as happened during quark epoch in Big bang, those protruding crests interacted to form gluons,i will do combination later,when they stretch they form gluon flux tubes and when they tear they form gluon balls. i wish initially i could have gone step by step to bring coherence to what am doing. ....structure of neutrino and z boson the outside pointing arrow represent virtual particles emitted from crest while inside pointing arrow represent virtual particles emitted from troughs w boson structure....