molbol2000

The semiotics of modern medicine is curious. The serpent is an ancient Indo-European symbol of evil and lies, and the cup was earlier than something like a connection with heavenly gods through fire, fire was usually kindled in the cup (even Olympic), and probably this is where the symbol of the holy grail comes from In Russian, the word "doctor" etymologically comes from the root "lie" and in a literal grammatical interpretation would mean "liar": "vrat"-"vrach" So we can answer: Can Science Make us live shorter? (and worse)

The modern type of science defenetly not. Ancient people lived about as long as we do, and a meager increase in life span is associated not with science, but with comfortable conditions If science could do anything, we would have lived at least longer than a few thousand years ago, but even this is not. Scientific advances are truly zero (or not for the common people)

In what sense? Of course, memory is needed anyway. But with its excess, an algorithmic type of brain develops. The type that keeps millions instructions for any case of life. Like PC. It's no good for human evolution. Of course, IQ-testing is far from ideal.But this at least shows the ability to generalize and self-study.

Because "they" not need for clever effective politics and manegers. They need keeping power, and stupid politicans are good as comfortable puppets. In addition, the modern mainstream of power and the image of the intellectual is an autistic type, where not intelligence, but memory plays a crucial role.

Are you talking about just aerobic work without intensivety? This on the contrary kill us due to oxidental processes.

This is morally unacceptable to society. The politicans that allowed a person to commit suicide must resign or, better, kill themself

Carl Hewitt, patriarch of artificial intelligence talks about Actor Model

this has already been discussed

here we are not talking about elementary physical activity it even happens that a person builds up strength, but his muscles do not grow

I do not understand what we are talking about. There are naturally athletes who do not exercise at all, but look athletic, and have strength, there are those who exercise but have no result, or it is insignificant

A person with few glycolytic fibers will never be a good sprinter or weightlifter. Is it named " genetics is affects what you are"? BTW I did not say it, but some propertyes determinated by genetics. There are many things that not determinated and can be achieved in different ways

Okay, that's what I said, that speed and strength are genetically determined. What's next?

Usually lisp recomended, and in times when this area was alive, only lisp was used for design other DSL for concrete problems. But old lisps was differ, they was simpler and very dynamic

by the way, on the topic, there is an opinion that in ancient (pre-Indo-European) Europe there was matriarchy

By the way, this is a very interesting question, and a very important one. Wars in the past era went just for the land, moreover, the most fertile steppe land with good conditions for irrigation(river valleys, such as the Vedic Seven Rivers) was the nomad's lands