TheVat

That is fascinating and astonishing. What I mean is that I have heard that Kelvin quote over and over almost my entire adult life, from teachers and scientists I respected, from science writers of sterling reputation, and no one ever contested its accuracy! I would say that this demonstrates the pernicious way many repetitions can make a wholly fictitious statement or attribution develop the ring of truth. Really, I am quite happy to learn that Kelvin was in fact responsive to the results of the MM experiments and not so dogmatic. And also startled that Michelson would say something like that. I would assume he backed away pretty quickly from that a few years later. Good job on debunking the quote, Genady.

Reminds me of William Thompson, Lord Kelvin, who said in the 1890s that "There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement." It sounds foolish now, but you have to recall that Kelvin had lived through a staggering wave of advances in the field that included Maxwell unifying electricity and magnetism and deriving the speed of light, then Hertz's experimental verifications, so there were many in science who were thinking that took care of all the forces. And the luminiferous aether hadn't been tossed aside yet. Kind of funny that Michelson and Morley had done their first aether experiment in 1887. But Kelvin et al didn't pay much attention.

It may help to read the thread. Things moved on from the OP. And if energy is dirt cheap and carbon neutral then the need for your suggested air extraction would seem less pressing. As a practical matter, the air extraction systems I've seen all seem to be Drop in the Bucket solutions. It's a general term for removing atmospheric co2 and keeping it in some relatively stable form, out of the airshed.

I got the hint. Yes, barycenter (looking at a single orbit) means one of the foci of an elliptical orbit. And the sun also orbits that barycenter, very tightly, so it is not right at the focus, either. The cumulative effect of all the 8.5 planets also shifts the barycenter so that it would be pretty unlikely to find the sun at a focus of one single orbit.

Well, the sun is not actually at the barycenter. And Newton understood the barycenter lay outside the sun's sphere.

I was wondering about the orbits, but I wasn't expecting a banknote to attempt accurate renditions of orbital eccentricity. If it's about orbital mechanics, Kepler should be sitting beside Newton. The geometry drawing seems to be treating an ellipse like a circle?

The wildly askew orbits drawn around it, right? I wonder if the horse's ass dimension was for separate motor segments. I also wondered why diameter would be specifically limited to the rail gauge - some cargo is noticeably wider than the rails on many train shipments.

That photo does seem pretty improbable. Meep meep.

I think the story is that he was in weakened health, and the fowl experiment meant spending some time out in harsh cold, a condition often associated with snow, which caused further weakening and immune failure leading to pneumonia. A thumbnail version of the story doesn't fill in those blanks.

Indeed. And of those how many does your brain register as of the slightest importance? My answer, on any given day: 0. The primary function of the mind is pruning out irrelevant stimuli. Most of us engage with ads online anout as much as we engage with street noise filtering into our houses. A dog started barking down the road, a toddler cried at the daycare across the street, a heavy trailer rattled over the bump at the intersection....my day and outlook is not transformed. It's just another day with normal ambient noises. @Trurl, would it be possible to post in the default font of this forum? Yours seems microscopic on this tablet.

One of my favorite anecdotes is that Bacon died as a result of practicing his empiricism, conducting a scientific experiment. He went out to stuff a fowl with snow in an experiment on meat preservation, contracted pneumonia and died. I have wondered if that story is apocryphal but it's still a good story. It is, however, true that his mother was Lady Anne Cook, so when she married Nicholas Bacon, she became known as....

I like that phi is the limit of ratios of successive Fibonacci numbers. What's cool is that the series will converge on phi with any starting value.

Because such a revenge debases our humanity. Imagining such cruelties with glee puts you in his sick world.

I wish we had read authors like Dostoyevsky in school, but maybe we were too young. Most of my reading during K-12 was outside of the school curriculum. But school did expose me to writers like Orwell, Twain, Hawthorne, and Steinbeck, along with some Shakespeare. And like every high school student in the US, I read Catcher in the Rye. Outside the schoolhouse, I ranged widely through sci-fi, adventure, anthropology and many science books. Later, in my twenties, classics - Dostoyevsky, Camus, Nabokov, Kant, Poe, HG Wells, et al. I remember @Moontanman mentioned book, When Worlds Collide, partly because Hutchinson, Kansas becomes the US capital city after a catastrophe and we lived near there. Hutchinson as the capital of anything is a hilarious concept.

It may help to know this thread spun off from one about efficient cooling in a hot climate, spec. SoCal. So the chat was sort of focused on the hot places that are now heading towards uninhabitable for humans. The thread is just developing ideas, and that's one of them. I would imagine each idea which used a subterranean or rock-embedded approach would have to find ways to bring in natural light. Light tubes would be one, park areas carved into surface alcoves another. There are many ways to skin a cat.* * a figure of speech our cats find disgusting That was interesting. And a reminder that thick temperature moderating walls can be built with low tech and local earthen materials. I'd love to see a return to some form of this in areas of the US Southwest.

I've wondered if certain lines of development (body morphology in particular) are more likely paths to a spacefaring tech society. One guess is that you need to be able to make tools and so there's a minimum requirement of articulated appendages, and tech progress is more likely if you're land-dwelling and have a need to make fire. That still allows a vast range of possible forms. I liked the speculation in "Arrival" that the aliens were completely unlike humans but did have articulation at the ends of their tentacles. BTW, some amusing visualizations of aliens are to be seen in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barlowe's_Guide_to_Extraterrestrials

A relative of mine was born in 1988. He plays piano. Clearly this was destined to be. Born '88, and a piano has 88 keys. God reveals things. Still doubting? Then consider this: he developed a fondness for jelly rolls early in life, and Jelly Roll Morton was a famous piano player and composer. Finally, when his mother was pregnant with him, she and his father were driving through Texas and drove through the town of Plano. As they entered, the city sign had a spot of pale dirt on it which altered the lower case L so that Plano looked like Piano. Piano, Texas. It was a sign! Well, it was literally a sign anyway. IOW, people look for signs that will somehow validate their choices and/or elevate their importance, and this is a form of selection bias.

Smoke began seeping from his head....

It says something that the leading proponent of ID, Phil Johnson, is a law professor not a scientist. Nobody can do a bullshit argument like a lawyer. Are you familiar with King of the Hill? There is an episode where Hank has a new assistant at his propane business who constantly makes that's what she said jokes. IIRC Hank finally delivers an ultimatum concerning the assistant's continued employment, capped with "...and that's what I said!" It's hard to resist making them, when that gets into one's head.

Yes, some berm house are made by building up soil rather than major excavation. They're left open on the front but with soil built up everywhere else then stabilized with sod. I was unfamiliar with Disney tunnels, our family was never into theme parks like that. So I looked them up, learned that Walt saw a cowboy walking through Tomorrowland on his way to Frontierland and felt that messed up the guest experience. Which led to the utilidor system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_utilidor_system Sounds like the sort of places people take refuge in an apocalypse novel. Your termite mound sounds similar to the sci-fi concept of the arcology. I have reflected on the inefficiency of having stoves that release their heat into an air conditioned house, or fridges that also do that. In the USA, the range hood is a rudimentary approach which vents some of the heat. In the 19th century through the early 20th here, some homes had "summer kitchens" and a stove would be set up in an enclosed porch so that its heat wouldn't go into the home interior.

Yes, I'm familiar with that "my partner dragged me into this" dynamic. When I first knew my wife, I didn't know she was afraid of heights. I knew that she liked to hike, as did I. But when she went with me on a hike that involved some steep spots and cliffs, I discovered that she had only come along to keep me company and had not realized quite what the hike involved. It is awkward when someone is clinging to the ground and afraid to move in any direction. I had to always position myself so that, in theory, I could catch her or she would at least land on me and that would slow the downward slide. And kept giving reminders not to look down, and pointing out handholds or easier work-arounds. What was so great about her was that, when we were back on safe ground, she was really happy and just got over the scary part, even making jokes about it. Then, some time later, we went hiking and an unexpected thunderstorm rolled in and pelted us with rain, and the situation was somewhat reversed. I hated getting soaking wet (it was cold, too) but she didn't mind in the slightest and was joyful. So, eventually, she passed it on to me and I was enjoying myself.

I guess I'm playing the straight man in this routine, mainly as I'm curious as to where sdd is going with this. The mistranslations are also a bonus, for their giggle factor. Could it relate to optical analogues like this... https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0232 Hawking radiation is unlikely to be measured from a real black hole, but can be tested in laboratory analogues. It was predicted as a consequence of quantum mechanics and general relativity, but turned out to be more universal. A refractive index perturbation produces an optical analogue of the black-hole horizon and Hawking radiation that is made of light. We discuss the central and recent experiments of the optical analogue, using hands-on physics. We stress the roles of classical fields, negative frequencies, ‘regular optics’ and dispersion. Opportunities and challenges ahead are briefly mentioned.

Teaching of such a skill requires understanding nuances of human emotion and behavior. I don't think AI will have that. If you had a student who was trying to conceal that they were frightened, and was more likely to make a mistake underwater because of fear, an AI would not be able to deal with that. A human teacher OTOH shares with the student a basic range of emotions and so could help. Also how could an AI understand what early stages of nitrogen narcosis feel like and how to be aware of symptoms? I'm sure there are dozens of examples. Any activity that is risky to a human, you want a human sharing that risk with you because you both share motivation to keep living.

Seems really similar to this thread you started last year. can you expand a little on what you learned in the past year?