coffeesippin

I don't know if bible verses will be allowed here, but probably everyone will have seen posters and greeting cars reading, "Love is kind, patient ..." I'll try this instead: 'Love is that which leads to life.' Then we must define life .. biologists will have an opinion on that, and there will be many different opinions, because there will be staunch atheist biologists who believe we return only to dust, and those who believe in the eternal life with God after death hoped for by Jews, Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, and many others. Does the science of Biology itself have anything to say about life after death? Yes. There is significant and unexplainable biological life after death according to Alexander Pozhitkov who was a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Germany. https://medium.com/neodotlife/gene-expression-lives-on-on-after-death-63b204727591 Is there any practical value to believing in life after death aside from comfort of heaven? Yes. "... transplant researchers are exploring whether to keep organs warm on life support instead of chilled in coolers to improve transplant outcomes. It’s not clear the extent to which RNA transcription explains any of the benefits of warm transplants." Does biology proving life does not end with death prove God's existence? That is another question .. but for sure Google knows how to enlarge on a topic.

My scientific interest is mostly cosmology. My boyhood nickname was Sputnik from my interest in astronomy; boyhood pal Fred still calls me that 60 years later. I became a believer in the King James Bible 41 years ago, that book proving accurate in every word. I am not a Flat Earther, and believe Science will prove itself as accurate as the KJV if given the chance. I have four grandchildren, one of them 30 years old, but because of the world condition I hope not to become a great grandfather. In the past 14 years I've done a few solo canoe expeditions varying from six weeks to three months. I make it a general rule stay out of whitewater, but find a great relationship to physics when afloat.

For sure there is neither free speech nor general advancement in science here. People presenting the latest science are labelled trolls and banned, so I have both scientific and spiritual objections to the quality of moderation on this forum. A lot of the mod decisions are bigoted and prejudiced, or made with little knowledge of recent advancements in science, made with little attempt to read what is actually written or why it is written, the bigotry and prejudice manipulating the thoughts of the mods. I also suspect some mods use sock puppetry. That's all I'll say, except that the bigotry and prejudice is so strong it has obviously been allowed to continue with administrator approval, so no amount of evidence presented is going to change things, and I won't waste my time presenting any.

`God is love.` 1 John 4:7 It`s logical that God MUST be love to bless mankind so abundantly despite mankind`s nasty greed that mankind has survived countless wars of greed, especially with the weapons available to mankind.

Direct experience of Black Holes if they exist for instance is said to be impossible. I don't think Kitty knew about scientists who put so much faith in computer models. Aristarchus was a big brain, and he got banished for showing the earth revolved around the sun, instead of the sun around the earth. The worst of those who practice that formula seem to be moderators. Unfortunately the old adage 'power corrupts' seems to be especially true on internet discussion forums where people have little chance of ever meeting face to face, so it doesn't really matter if you insult someone, except that you may be banned. The threat of banishment is almost totally removed from moderators, so they can get carried away in their own self importance, earning the support of other moderators so inclined. A moderator in this forum has already belittled me publicly for 'your treatment of evidence against you' but I was quickly able to prove the evidence against me was totally fabricated and in fact the link that was provided did not even go to the quoted source. No apology to me arrived either in public or my mailbox. That type of moderator action happens frequently on internet discussion forums, but if a non moderator makes a complaint he can be labelled as a troll. Nasty stuff. That's why it has to be done in soft, subtle, polite ways like it's done by the people who don't want to appear to be doing so because it makes them look stupid and uneducated.