Jump to content

Ghideon

Senior Members
  • Posts

    2568
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    21

Posts posted by Ghideon

  1. 2 hours ago, Coxy123 said:

    please bring £1000,000 to my house

    Done. I bring £1000,000 to your house, zero times.  

    Maybe you are confusing multiplication with subtraction when you create your examples. 

     

    (edit: User banned while I was writing)

  2. 1 hour ago, Rian00077 said:

    This is the theory about a different space and time definition.

    from your document:

    Quote

    light in A1 is not photons (which cannot exist here), but rather elements of space with rest mass tending to zero (and energy tending to zero).

    It seems completely incompatible with established physics, can you elaborate? For instance, how do your ideas explain the photoelectric effect?

  3. 15 hours ago, PeterBushMan said:

    someone told me that ---

    How to change you IP address
    Windows 10:  1) Press the Win+R keys together to open the Run box dialog.
     Type cmd and enter.

    2) Enter ipconfig /release (make sure to include the space) and hit Enter.

    3) Type ipconfig /renew (include the space) and select Enter. Close the prompt to exit.

     

    Why it does not wok?

    I may depend on what your computer is connected to. Even if you have a dynamic IP address the device that responds to ipconfig /renew command does not necessarily hand out a different IP address. Note @swansont's spot-on response; renew the lease means that the same IP can be reused.

    6 hours ago, swansont said:

    renew the DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) lease.

    An example of two situations where same IP is reused (there are others and a thorough answer would require insight into details):
    -Static lease (DHCP reservation); the IP is reserved for a specific device
    -the server may assign the same IP address because it's the next (or only one) available.

  4. On 1/27/2024 at 8:18 PM, Falkor said:

    I am engineer

    Ok!

    2 hours ago, Falkor said:

    Ok so apparently this is tied with solonoids apparently.    What’s weird is I am getting very huge spikes in electricity.    I tried this with some water in a glass and this weird wave kept flowing back and forth through the water it kept multiplying and I was just getting huge results with my oscilloscope that I fried the circuitry.     I was also doing some math and this 2 to 3 number keeps appearing it also seems to be tied in with some fractal patterning going on.     I must be really stupid because there is something happening here.    If I am reading the literature correctly this phenomenon is basically some quantum effect that is tied in with general relativity and quantum mechanics.    This dual nature is extremely bothersome.   What’s worse is my water system I have designed is extremely efficient.  I’m getting huge numbers I have never seen before just from adding these vibrations to the liquid.    It can’t possibly be that what’s moving is not the object but space itself?     That just can’t be, but this issue with paper having a poisson ratio of less than zero is making me believe that there is some knot action going on and that mass creates a fractal pattern that propagates through space time which leads to general relativity and can be quantized as qbits?     I must be really stupid because I’m missing something here

    As an engineer, perhaps you could consider revisiting and rewriting your explanation, focusing on ensuring that the mix of scientific terms and concepts is presented coherently and aligns with established scientific principles and theories? 

     

  5. Your code does not seem syntactically correct. 

    12 hours ago, Trurl said:
    p = 2564855351;
    x = 3;
    Monitor[While[x <= p, If[(Sqrt[p^3/(p*x^2 + x)] - p) < 0.5, Print[x];
       Break[];];
      x += 2;];
     If[x <= p, While[x <= p, If[Divisible[p, x], Print[x];
         Break[];];
        x += 2;];], x]

     

    First function corrected:

    p = 2564855351;
    x = 3;
    Monitor[While[x <= p, If[x*(Sqrt[p^3/(p*x^2 + x)]) - p) < 0.5, Print[x];
       Break[];];
      x += 2;

     

    Same as all my recent descriptions.

     

  6. On 1/24/2024 at 9:06 PM, Trurl said:

    and display x when it breaks it should be within range of the smaller Prime factor.

    What does "within range" mean?

    23 hours ago, Trurl said:

    That y intercept is where x approaches the value of the smaller Prime factor.

    What do you mean by "approaches"? 

  7. 11 hours ago, Trurl said:

    The code I posted was generated by ChatGPT. It simplified the equation. You should try it in  Mathematica. It is not meant to be efficient but the first function should break (and print) near zero and estimate the smaller factor x.

    You may have misunderstood the output from the LLM*. Your claims does not seem to match the code you posed above.

     

    11 hours ago, Trurl said:

    If the program from ChatGPT works you should be able to modify the testing steps ( from every odd number to x+=22 or larger)

     

    The one thing that needs checking is how GPT simplified the equation.

    What are your results from testing your program? 

     

    12 hours ago, Trurl said:

    There are no  anomalies

    Ok, you missed the point. 

     

    *) LLM=Large Language Model

  8. Maybe it helps to view the lack of patterns in more dimensions?
    I've generated a surface plot of the function x×y for x and y ranging from 3 to 100. This plot represents a smooth, continuous surface, as expected from the multiplication of real numbers.

    Within this plot, every prime and semi-prime number in the given range is represented. Notice that the surface is uniformly smooth. There are no distinct features, patterns, or anomalies that visually distinguish primes or semi-primes from other numbers: 

    image.png.6271e8210b6cf40df1acb1321101145a.png

    Let's modify the surface plot; the function is based on @Trurl's program code: 

    image.png.a97c99fc0cbdc3afefc781b124451b0f.png

    This plot is also smooth. Again there are no distinct features, patterns, or anomalies that visually distinguish primes or semi-primes from other numbers.

    Using another algebraic function will not help; there are no patterns. Plotting a larger area does not help either; the surface is smooth for any numbers. 

     

    20 hours ago, Trurl said:

    I will try to factor the largest semi-Prime posted earlier.

    please report your progress so far.

  9. 2 hours ago, Paulsrocket said:

    Nima Arkani-Hamed at the Max Planck institute for physics in Munich

    THE END OF SPACETIME.  Be sure to let him know what you disagree with

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GL77oOnrPzY&t=1802s

    The video, which delves into quantum mechanics and theoretical physics, does not mention 'photons' at all in the transcript. Can you explain how the video is relevant?

    (Note: thanks to machine learning and NLP I did not watch the video)

  10. On 1/8/2024 at 2:19 AM, Trurl said:

    Please prove it right by finding large Primes.

    You can test using the numbers I provided:

    https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/124453-simple-yet-interesting/?do=findComment&comment=1219386

    On 1/8/2024 at 2:19 AM, Trurl said:

    I know such information is valuable, but if no one attempts to find large Primes with it I don’t know if the program even works.

    Finding large primes with your approach unfortunately does not work; mathematical reasons why has been presented already.

  11. 15 hours ago, AIkonoklazt said:

    If you count "there is no such thing as programming without programming" as a law in computational science, then there is still "a scientific law or theorem that makes artificial consciousness impossible"

    I do not count that statement ("there is no such thing as programming without programming") as a law in computational science. 

  12. On 11/22/2023 at 1:57 PM, dimreepr said:

    From your link:

    Quote

    “we know of no fundamental law or principle operating in this universe that forbids the existence of subjective feelings in artifacts designed or evolved by humans.1”

    To the best of our knowledge, this claim is valid still today.

    Thanks! For some reason I did not initially notice your quote @dimreepr
    It provides an answer to my initial question in this topic; Is there a scientific law or theorem that makes artificial consciousness impossible? 

  13. 6 hours ago, Bjarne-7 said:

    but you have to give me the data, and to be able to compare forces, you have to tell me how much force is need to keep the the atom in orbit. So please cooperate. 

    The LHC primarily accelerates protons (and can also accelerate ions). The concept of "atom in orbit" does not apply to the operations and experiments conducted at the LHC at CERN so I do not know what you are asking.

  14. 4 hours ago, Bjarne-7 said:

    I prefer that you give an example, but you must know and state how much energy you expect to need to keep an atom in orbit at nearly the speed c. Then I will for comparison calculate how much (little) comparable  importance RR has in the worst possible scenario.

    Ok. Just show the mathematical equations and we'll insert numbers from publicly available CERN data.

    (Note: "atom in orbit" is not related to my question as far as I can tell.) 

  15. 2 hours ago, Bjarne-7 said:

    I am not sure you quite understand the principles for RR and DFA (etc.) - 

    That is true. Your descriptions need to be more precise. (as @swansont said above)

    2 hours ago, Bjarne-7 said:

    So you have to ask me a well defined question and also let me know, mass , speed and required energi / force to keep that en orbit... Otherwise we can easy misunderstand each other.

    Pick any reasonable example of your liking. Also define what you mean by "orbit" is in reference to the circular motion of particles in LHC. @Bufofrog gave a correct answer above for celestial bodies in orbit and I do not know if that is what you mean here.

  16. On 11/25/2023 at 8:56 AM, Bjarne-7 said:

    - An absolute motion reference frame is introduced, this is relative to absolute rest.

    Example: Consider the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. As far as I know it operates effectively irrespective of Earth's rotation or its orbit around the sun, which constantly changes the LHC's orientation. According to your theory, the LHC's performance should vary with these changes, necessitating regular adjustments? Could you explain how your theory accounts for the consistent operation of the LHC under constant change of orientation? What does the lack of adjustments for absolute motion tell you? 

  17. 1 hour ago, Trurl said:

    Ok say I buy something for$100 + $6.00 sales tax. Then the person I bought from buys something for $100 + $6.00 sales tax. And so on and so forth for n, the number of money transactions.

    What fiscal system is that? In a typical sales tax system, the tax is levied only on the final sale to the consumer. Your description does not match any existing system that I am familiar with, so I'm curios.

  18. Quote

    Would you pay for an App that was a very specific AI bot?

    I guess it depends on the context. My car has a voice control for navigation; to me as a user that specific function behaves like a "specialised bot"*. In this case the price of "the bot" is included in the price of the car. Would I pay for it if it was an optional app? Maybe.

     

    *)I classify this as an application "AI" since there is a capability to imitate intelligent human behaviour. I have no insight in the implementation.

  19. 9 hours ago, grayson said:

    a higher being that knows about the future told you that in two up to four hours, a person will knock at your door and try to kill you.

    The ethics of providing such a vague and potentially misleading prediction would be questionable, especially if the higher being has the power to foresee and influence events. So the ethical question is more about the higher being's role in potentially setting up a situation that could lead to violence.
    Also the provided scenario mixes logical possibilities with ethical questions so that the ethical question gets obscured by the need to address logical issues.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.