Lan Todak

Hi everyone... Why Don't all of you talk about algorithm ( a set of instructions that allows a machine to be responsive). I mean why do AI look Like zombies to us although they are cooperative and responsive. What are the missing parts that weve overlooked. I think by discussing about this, allowing us to understand how unique free will is and why humans look Alive. I think it has something to do with yes-no process. You know what I mean.

I have something to share to all of you. As the title says, i will talk about earth's gravity growing with a proof. Don't worry, the proof I will provide can be tested in a lab just like you usually do, a very simple lab test. // I have asked admin to repost the topic. I hope this is ok.

I have something to share to all of you. As the title says, i will talk about earth's gravity growing with a proof but I need at least 1000 likes for precaution. Don't worry, the proof I will provide can be tested in a lab just like you usually do, a very simple lab test.

My phone screen is broken. I will try to do that soon. Anyway i Aman activist.

😃If I can't get charity from this site, can I get support from publisher? Is nyone here working on publishing company? I would like to publish my idea. If anyone could help me I will start a new topic right away 😃 Hi everyone...

Most of the time, when we understand one system or nature, we can create a simple and smooth math from it. But for an unknown, you might get wrong anticipation. For example, a machine produces an output using collatz conjecture. You ask some experts determine the system and create a math from it. What will you expect the results? They will create different maths. Oddly every math will work just fine on certain level but not on others. This is how we deal with gravity.

That's Interesting inquiry but I believe in aliens or programmers over god or gods. I don't really care if they're powerful or not. Regarding your inquiry, you shouldn't take it lightly against gods in which you rely heavily on intuitions solely. Otherwise, it's a faith based opinion. Anyway, I still find discussing about existence is intriguing.

Do you mean god can only be himself, don't you?

In my sensei 😎

The edges are 1 and 2 with 1.5 as the centre. Your set can't represent our universe. 😑

😜 I dont have... 🤐

There is an inherent error in the engine system. Bypass it and you can double the output.

I can catch up with your phrases. What this "A.I. seeks to defend itself" means with reference to this this phrase "consciousness of the internet"

A.I can do more job. Why we need to make ant as example? If microscopic variables give rise to conscious mind, can we get A.I abilities to adapt to ransom environment as how conscious mind works?

Nvm... I just tried to waste my time

Ant can adept environments, establish new perceptions and communicate with new languages as long as its senses work. A.I can't do that even its sensors work flawlessly. A.I needs to be reprogrammed in oder to adept.

When we remove all the programs and experiences an A.I once had and that A.I recreates those it has lost, that means that A.I is aware or conscious. //I mean all the codes in all classes including the main class. See if that A.I could rewrite those codes again. *just for fun. ;). I am bored rite now.

Hot wallpaper... 😁

The distance between muons and the detector is call space and this distance got contracted. That explains why muons survived. It does not matter which frame you choose, in physics, space is nothing. you will need to rework space-time curvature to compensate this poorly defined conception(empty space) because they do not match. On top of that, it's necessary to rework time dilation too as its independence of direction will not fix in.

They are correct, but we are discussing about whether we can apply relativity to empty space or not. AFAIK, we treat empty space as nothingness. We map space by constructing coordinate system so we can make measurements but we do it differently when applying length contraction. We apply directly to space which contradicts with our main concepts of space. By doing that we treat space as a thing. I don't get what u mean. It's kind of like you don't follow the topic about twins paradox currently being discussed.

When applying length contraction, we apply it to particles of that object but space between them must remain intact (if space mapping is just coordinate system). Yup... absolutely... 😉