Vmedvil

Well, this was about that until you started to debate with me on it, Higgs Bosons give stuff mass, photons don't have them, special relativity doesn't allow things to go faster than C, Electrons generate photons as Cherenkov radiation when going faster than C's speed in a medium, which is in a tachyonic domain at that point for that medium.

Go to a journal, Experiment, or Observation to prove your case, that can be multi-viewed that was under the scientific method.

Well, we all know how to do "anti-gravity" so obviously not what I am talking about, Meissner effect of superconductors which is an magnetism property is "Anti-gravity". My point is there is a medium that he was referring to when he wrote this stuff.

No, not the aether that GR proved wrong which was light moved in a certain direction faster, but GR is still a type of aether, and there is nothing mystical about that in physics it just means has a medium which is time-space. The Aether of GR is Time-space have you ever heard that term? Otherwise, what is curving. When trying to reverse engineer Einstein you gotta listen to his terms. Einstein sometimes used the word aether for the gravitational field within general relativity, but this terminology never gained widespread support.

No others Errors were found, Precession. Ωp = (((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)(3Rp/Rs2(ωp Rp) -ωp )) Transform back correctly, had to check the entire equation after one mistake was noticed there are no others, neither Ωp or S should have been 2 as mk should not have been. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/ (((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp ))))Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/(((3G(Erest/C2))/2C2Rs3)(RpVp) + (GIs/C2Rs3)((3Rp/Rs2)(ωp Rp) -ωp )))))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs) - (ksRs2C2) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2)

Yes, it is based on the medium Time-space, The ether of the general theory of relativity is a medium which is itself devoid of all mechanical and kinematical qualities, but helps to determine mechanical (and electromagnetic) events. The theory of special relativity explains how space and time are linked for objects that are moving at a consistent speed in a straight line. One of its most famous aspects concerns objects moving at the speed of light. Aether theories (also known as ether theories) in physics propose the existence of a medium, the aether (also spelled ether, from the Greek word (αἰθήρ), meaning "upper air" or "pure, fresh air"), a space-filling substance or field, thought to be necessary as a transmission medium for the propagation of electromagnetic or gravitational forces.

Well, the first Cvaccum , VMedium , The Second C2medium The one in SR, so it is based on how the medium effects these things particles if the medium is different then that would be different being the field that the particle interacts with in time-space. I am just saying how SR is messed up, if the field is tachyonic then the C2 is different.

what does tachyonic mean strange? Like, I said the Index becomes tachyonic or field, the field of SR is that C.

Well, it has Tachyonic states let me find the article. he Higgs mechanism was incorporated into modern particle physics by Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam, and is an essential part of the standard model. In the standard model, at temperatures high enough that electroweak symmetry is unbroken, all elementary particles are massless. At a critical temperature, the Higgs field becomes tachyonic; the symmetry is spontaneously broken by condensation, and the W and Z bosons acquire masses. (This is also known as electroweak symmetry breaking; EWSB.) Fermions, such as the leptons and quarks in the Standard Model, can also acquire mass as a result of their interaction with the Higgs field, but not in the same way as the gauge bosons. Higgs Critical That is why on the dark matter post, I said it was impossible for it to be charged with electric charge as Electroweak breaks before neutrino, because I thought the wiki said that Sterile Neutrinos were charged.

Do you see how it absolutely changes the c of SR to a higher amount, then vacuum C in that frame, if (n xem/t')2 = c2

No, its not because Higgs Bosons do it.

Start at index of refraction equation. C = 299,792,458 meters per second , v = 299,792,459 meters per second (n xem/t)2 = c2 What is Change in time in that frame.

Ya, that. (n xem/t)2 = c2 The Index goes above 1 slightly because of time dilation in the reference frame for space.

Oh, I am missing an X, (n /xem t) = C , (n /xem t)2 = C2

That is not my equation that is, Sergey Vavilov and Pavel Cherenkov.

Cherenkov Radiation equation and n is the index of refraction of the material being time-space in this context.

Read the post above you, I never said wrong just incomplete.

Well, I am not saying it is wrong but Einstein missed something which he would have no have know about C = n t, so C2 = n2 t2 , since this was not found out until the 50's and this was made back in the 10's SR, he never took in account his own time dilation effect on C. n increases as Time dilates thus C does too.

Well, Technically there are particles that do go slightly faster than the speed of light but this causes them to give off Cherehov radiation like the higgs boson gives it as rest mass for particles generated, where electrons going faster than the speed of light in a material will cause the same effect which is not actually faster than the speed of light but faster than light's speed in that material, it causes them to become unstable or however you would like to put it and start to bleed off energy as photons. Cherenkov radiation electrons Tachyon Condensation Higgs Bosons So, if you are going above light's speed in anything quickly you will lose the energy moving you above that as some sort of particle. This is one thing that unchanged SR is dead wrong about, but it is still very close to real universe in its predictions, because it goes undefined above C.

Forgot a 2 [math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_{s},\omega_{p},M,I,k,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu) = \sqrt{\hbar \omega_{s}(|Log_{(DgDa D \psi D \phi - W)}(\frac{2 \hbar G C^{2}R_{s} - \frac{1}{4}F^{a}_{\mu v}F^{a \mu v } + i(\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi_{i} + (\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D^{2}_{\mu}}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac {E_{Rest}}{C^{2}} \omega_{s} \sqrt{\frac{G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{-g_{uv}}} + {\frac{\frac{S R^{2}_{s}}{\Omega_{p}}}{2}}{{ \frac{2E_{rest}}{\hbar^{2}C^{2}}}}}[/math] Those fractions are not displaying correctly and I don't know where it is screwed up I will rewrite it in latex tomorrow.

Testing more latex [math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_{s},\omega_{p},M,I,k,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu) = \sqrt{\hbar \omega_{s}(|Log_{(DgDa D \psi D \phi - W)}(\frac{2 \hbar G C^{2}R_{s} - \frac{1}{4}F^{a}_{\mu v}F^{a \mu v } + i(\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi_{i} + (\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D^{2}_{\mu}}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac {E_{Rest}}{C^{2}} \omega_{s} \sqrt{\frac{G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{-g_{uv}}} + {\frac{\frac{S R^{2}_{s}}{\Omega_{p}}}{2}}{\hbar^{2 \frac{2E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}}}[/math] Where both of the above are jacked up, I will fix the latex another time, those fractions..... are displaying wrong.

Which then changes S's state because of that error from S2 to S. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/ Ωp))Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S/Ωp)))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs) - (ksRs2C2) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) So that latex is wrong as S is not squared. [math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_{s},\omega_{p},M,I,k,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu) = \sqrt{\hbar \omega_{s}(|Log_{(DgDa D \psi D \phi - W)}(\frac{2 \hbar G C^{2}R_{s} - \frac{1}{4}F^{a}_{\mu v}F^{a \mu v } + i(\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi_{i} + (\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D^{2}_{\mu}}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac {E_{Rest}}{C^{2}} \omega_{s} \sqrt{\frac{G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{-g_{uv}}} + {\frac{\frac{S R^{2}_{s}}{\Omega_{p}}}{2}}{\hbar^{2 \frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}}}[/math] The box is too short but here it is now Simplified and corrected. the QM part.

and I finally figured out where this 2 goes again, which on (S2 / Anderson Equation ) 2 there is a missing on the latex version but doesn't effect the cancel. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ Ωp)2)Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/Ωp)2))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) and the 2 is the result of a transformation error so it will be removed. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ Ωp))Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/Ωp)))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) After looking back to why the hell it was there, so that latex is right, that squared was wrong.

that about half of it, which that shit does cancel, and I noticed some errors when I typed Anderson equation. ∇'(x,y,z,t,ωs,ωp,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħωs)((|(Log(DgDaDψDφ-W)(((2ħGC2))Rs - (1/4)FaμvFaμv + i(ψ-bar)γμDμψi +(ψ-bar)iLVijφψjr + (aji) - V(φ)/-Dμ2)|)-e2S(r,t)/h)) - ((Erest/C2)ωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/ Ωp))2)Rs2/2))) / (ħ2/2(Erest/C2))))1/2(((1-(((2(Erest/C2)G / Rs) - (Isωs(Guv - Ruv/-guv)1/2 + (S2/Ωp ))2))/2(Erest/C2))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)3)∫(((Erelativistic2 - Erest2 / C2) + ((Ar(X) + (ENucleon binding SNF ε0 μ0 /mu) - Ar(XZ+)/Z) / mu)2)(1/2)(1/e((ERelativistic - μchemical)/TMatter)±1)(ħωs + ħωs)) - ((ksRs2C2)) + (Guv - Ruv/-guv))1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))2/(C2)))1/2) Which will now be Ωp , until I type it again in latex.

[math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_s,\omega_p,E,I,k_s,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu)= \sqrt {\hbar \omega_s Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}\omega_s \sqrt{\frac {G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{g_{uv}}}} [/math] [math]+ \sqrt{(\frac{(\frac{S^{2}}{\frac{3G\frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}{2C^{2}R_{s}^{3}}}R_{p}v_{p}\frac{GI_{s}}{C^{2}}R_{s}^{3}(\frac{3R_{p}}{R_{s}^{2}}(\omega_{p}R_{p})- \omega_{p}))^{2}R_{s}^{2}}{2})\frac{Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}})}{\frac{\hbar^{2}(Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}))}{2\frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}}}[/math] Quantum Mechanics Part.