Baron d'Holbach

4 minutes ago, Mordred said:

describe physical objects

Oh, I am beyond that. I am explaining before the big bang, Prime Mechanics is explaining how the physical universe was created. 

So, you want to know basic stuff? Sure I guess. 

Prime Mechanics pg, 302

Ground State, 1 Dimension, zero spins, confine between [0,1] 

Part 1

The ground state refers to the lowest energy state of a system and can be described by a wave function Ψ(x), which is a mathematical representation of the probability density of finding the system in a particular state. The wave function of the ground state is a stationary wave meaning that it does not change with time. This is because the ground state has the lowest possible energy, and therefore there is no energy available to cause the system to change or evolve over time. It is a fixed, stable wave that represents the lowest energy state of the system.
Let us create a one-dimensional ground state stationary wave function with zero spins that are stationary between 0 and 1. 
Ψ(x) = √(2/L) * sin(πx/L)
This wave function describes a particle that is confined to the region between x=0 and x=L, and has zero spins. The probability density |Ψ(x)|^2 is uniform over the entire length of the box, and the energy of the ground state is given by:
E = (π^2 * h^2) / (2mL^2)
where h is Planck’s constant and m is the mass of the particle.
To apply the wave function Ψ(x) = √(2/L) * sin(πx/L) between 0 and 1, we need to normalize the wave function such that the integral of the probability density over all space is equal to 1. We can do this by using the following normalization condition:
∫0^1 |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 1
Plugging in the expression for Ψ(x), we get:
∫0^1 |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = ∫0^1 [√(2/L) * sin(πx/L)]^2 dx
Simplifying this expression, we get:
∫0^1 |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 2/L * ∫0^1 sin^2(πx/L) dx
Using the identity sin^2(θ) = (1/2) - (1/2)cos(2θ), we can rewrite this integral as:
∫0^1 |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 2/L * [x/2 - (L/2π)sin(2πx/L)] evaluated from x=0 to x=1
Evaluating this expression, we get:
∫0^1 |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 2/L * [1/2 - (L/2π)sin(2π/L)]
Now, to find the wave function between 0 and 1, we need to normalize Ψ(x) by dividing it by the square root of the integral we just calculated. That is,
Ψ_norm(x) = Ψ(x) / √[2/L * (1/2 - (L/2π)sin(2π/L))]
Substituting in the expression for Ψ(x), we get:
Ψ_norm(x) = [√(2/L) * sin(πx/L)] / √[2/L * (1/2 - (L/2π)sin(2π/L))]
Simplifying this expression, we get:
Ψ_norm(x) = √(2/L) * sin(πx/L) / √(1 - (L/π)sin(2π/L))
This is the normalized wave function for a particle in a one-dimensional box of length L, with the ground state described by Ψ(x) = √(2/L) * sin(πx/L), restricted to the interval from 0 to 1.

Part 2

To apply a node at x = 0.5 to the wave function Ψ(x) = √(2/L) * sin(πx/L), we need to introduce a phase shift of π/2 into the sine function. This is because a node is a point where the wave function goes to zero, and this can be achieved by introducing a phase shift of π/2 into the sine function, which changes its sign at the node.
The modified wave function with a node at x = 0.5 is given by:
Ψ(x) = √(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L)
To normalize this wave function, we need to use the same normalization condition as before:
∫0^L |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 1
Plugging in the expression for Ψ(x), we get:
∫0^L |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = ∫0^L [√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L)]^2 dx
Simplifying this expression, we get:
∫0^L |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 2/L * ∫0^L cos^2(π(x - 0.5)/L) dx
Using the identity cos^2(θ) = (1/2) + (1/2)cos(2θ), we can rewrite this integral as:
∫0^L |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 2/L * [x/2 + (L/4π)sin(2π(x - 0.5)/L)] evaluated from x=0 to x=L
Evaluating this expression, we get:
∫0^L |Ψ(x)|^2 dx = 2/L * [L/2 + (L/4π)sin(π)] = 1
Now, to find the normalized wave function with a node at x = 0.5, we need to divide the wave function by the square root of the integral we just calculated. That is,
Ψ_norm(x) = Ψ(x) / √[2/L * (L/2 + (L/4π)sin(π))]
Substituting in the expression for Ψ(x), we get:
Ψ_norm(x) = [√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L)] / √[1 + (1/2π)sin(2π(x - 0.5)/L)]
This is the normalized wave function for a particle in a one-dimensional box of length L, with the ground state described by Ψ(x) = √(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L), with a node at x = 0.5.
The wave function describes a particle that is most likely to be found in the region around x = 0.5L, and is less likely to be found as you move away from this point.

Part 3

To apply the standing wave and confine it between 0 and 1, we need to modify the wave function by rescaling it and shifting it along the x-axis.
First, we will scale the wave function by a factor of 1/L, so that it is confined to the interval [0,1]:
Ψ_scaled(x) = √(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) / L
Next, we will shift the wave function by adding 0.5 to x, so that it is centered at x = 0.5 and confined to the interval [0,1]:
Ψ_shifted(x) = √(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) / L, where 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
This is now a one-dimensional stationary wave function that is confined to the interval [0,1] and has zero spin. The amplitude of the wave function is greatest at x = 0.5 and decreases as x moves away from this point, with nodes at x = 0 and x = 1. The wave function is also properly normalized over the interval [0,1] by the normalization factor in the denominator.
The function has been slowly transformed and have shifted into a standing wave, and the node is not strictly at .5 anymore.
The wave function Ψ_shifted(x) is a standing wave, which means it has multiple nodes and antinodes. 

Part 4

Ground State, 2 Dimension, 1/2 spin, confine between [0,1] 

To extend the given equation to two dimensions, we can simply add another dimension, let’s say “y,” to the equation. We can write the two-dimensional equation as:
Ψ_shifted(x, y) = (√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) * cos(π(y - 0.5)/L)) / L^2
Here, we have multiplied the equation with the cosine of “y” in addition to the cosine of “x”. The equation still satisfies the condition of 0 ≤ x, y ≤ 1.
To describe a spin-½ particle, we can use the concept of spinors. A spinor is a mathematical object that describes the state of a particle’s spin. For a spin-½ particle, the spinor can be written as a two-component column vector. Let’s call the spinor for our particle “ψ.”
ψ = [a, b]^T
Here, “a” and “b” are complex numbers that satisfy the normalization condition |a|^2 + |b|^2 = 1, which ensures that the probability of finding the particle in any state is 1.
To make the particle spin at ½, we can choose “a” and “b” such that the particle is in a superposition of the spin-up and spin-down states. Let’s choose:
a = 1/√2
b = 1/√2
This spinor represents a particle that is equally likely to be found in the spin-up state and the spin-down state.
We can combine this spinor with the position wave function we derived earlier to get the full wave function of the particle:
Ψ(x, y) = (√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) * cos(π(y - 0.5)/L)) / L^2 * [a, b]^T
Here, “^T” denotes the transpose of the matrix.
The probability of finding the particle at any position can be calculated by taking the absolute value of the wave function and squaring it:
|Ψ(x, y)|^2 = |√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) * cos(π(y - 0.5)/L) * a|^2 + |√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) * cos(π(y - 0.5)/L) * b|^2 + 2Re(√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) * cos(π(y - 0.5)/L) * a * b^*)
Here, “*” denotes the complex conjugate of the spinor, and “Re” denotes the real part of the complex number. The third term represents the interference between the two spin states, and it arises because the two spin states are not orthogonal.
The probability of finding the particle in a particular region can be calculated by integrating this probability density over that region.
Ground State, 3 Dimension, 1 spin, confine between [0,1] and applying a 1% heat bath to showcase a thermal fluctuation. 

Part 5

To extend the given equation to three dimensions, we can simply add another dimension, let’s say “z,” to the equation. We can write the three-dimensional equation as:
Ψ_shifted(x, y, z) = (√(2/L) * cos(π(x - 0.5)/L) * cos(π(y - 0.5)/L) * cos(π(z - 0.5)/L)) / L^3
Here, we have multiplied the equation with the cosine of “z” in addition to the cosines of “x” and “y.” The equation still satisfies the condition of 0 ≤ x, y, z ≤ 1.
To make the particle spin at 1, we can choose the spinor “ψ” as:
ψ = [1, 0]^T
This spinor represents a particle that is always in the spin-up state.
To describe the time evolution of the particle, we can use the master equation, which describes the time evolution of the density matrix “ρ” of a quantum system. The master equation has the form:
dρ/dt = -i[H, ρ] + ∑j (L_j ρ L_j^† - 1/2 {L_j^† L_j, ρ}) + δ(ρ_eq - ρ)/τ
Here, “H” is the Hamiltonian of the system, “L_j” are the Lindblad operators that describe the effects of the environment on the system, “{ , }” denotes an anticommutator, “ρ_eq” is the equilibrium density matrix, and “τ” is the relaxation time.
In our case, since we have only one particle, the Hamiltonian is simply the kinetic energy operator:
H = -ħ^2/2m (∂^2/∂x^2 + ∂^2/∂y^2 + ∂^2/∂z^2)
The Lindblad operators describe the effects of the heat bath on the particle. We can choose the Lindblad operators as:
L_x = √γ σ_x L_y = √γ σ_y L_z = √γ σ_z
Here, “γ” is the rate of decoherence, “σ_x” “σ_y” and “σ_z” are the Pauli matrices, which describe the effects of the environment on the particle’s spin. The Lindblad operators represent the effects of the heat bath on the particle’s position and spin.
The equilibrium density matrix is given by:
ρ_eq = |ψ><ψ|
Here, “><“ denotes the outer product. The equilibrium density matrix represents the particle in its steady state, where it has reached thermal equilibrium with the environment.
Finally, we can add the effect of the heat bath to the master equation by adding the term δ(ρ_eq - ρ)/τ, which represents the relaxation of the particle toward its equilibrium state. We can choose the relaxation time as τ = 100/γ.
Putting everything together, the master equation for our system becomes:
dρ/dt = -i[-ħ^2/2m (∂^2/∂x^2 + ∂^2/∂y^2 + ∂^2/∂z^2), ρ] + ∑j (L_j ρ L_j^† - 1/2 {L_j^† L_j, ρ}) + δ(|ψ><ψ| - ρ)/(100/γ)
This equation describes the time evolution of the density matrix of the particle in the presence of a heat bath.

Part 6

Master Equation 

dρ/dt = -i[-ħ^2/2m (∂^2/∂x^2 + ∂^2/∂y^2 + ∂^2/∂z^2), ρ] + ∑j (L_j ρ L_j^† - 1/2 {L_j^† L_j, ρ}) + δ(|ψ><ψ| - ρ)/(100/γ)

The equation is a master equation that describes the time evolution of the density matrix of a system with three spatial dimensions, one spin degree of freedom, and subject to a thermal bath at 1% temperature.
The first term on the right-hand side of the equation corresponds to the Hamiltonian evolution of the system, which involves the Laplacian operator acting on the spatial part of the wave function. The second term describes the effect of the Lindblad operators, which represent the coupling of the system to its environment. The third term models the effect of the thermal bath on the system by imposing a relaxation time scale on the system’s approach to its equilibrium density matrix. The initial state of the system is given by the density matrix |ψ><ψ|.
 

Here is pg, 301, i call Prime gravity with scalar field 

S_phi = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi - V(phi)]

This equation is an action in an 11-dimensional system that describes the dynamics of a scalar field phi. The action consists of two terms:
1. The first term is the kinetic energy term, which describes the energy associated with the motion of the scalar field phi. It is given by (1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi, where g^{ij} is the inverse of the 11-dimensional metric tensor and ∂_i phi is the partial derivative of phi with respect to the i-th coordinate. This term is the same as the one in the Klein-Gordon equation, which is a relativistic wave equation that describes the motion of a spin-0 particle.
2. The second term is the potential energy term, which describes the energy associated with the interactions of the scalar field phi with itself and with other fields in the universe. It is given by V(phi), where V is the potential energy function of phi. This term is similar to the potential energy term in classical mechanics.
The action is a scalar quantity that describes the dynamics of the scalar field phi in 11-dimensional spacetime, taking into account the effects of Gravity, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy through the 11-dimensional metric tensor g^{ij}. The action is used to derive the equations of motion for the scalar field phi, which describes how the field evolves in time and space.
 

On substack, (its free to look) I wrote the mass gap and how Strong force creates particles from the vacuum. Boring. 

https://primemechanics.substack.com/p/final-relativity

I call this final Relativity. 

prime Mechanics pg, 76 explains Mass gap and how particles are made. I give you the ultimate answer. Not the boring one. 

Gravity is a elemental Matter. This means Gravity is leading itself, building upon itself (force, acceleration, curvature) toward the physical creation of the universe.

Gravity created everything! 

Just now, Mordred said:

open and closed system

Prime mechanic pg. 4-5. Please read carefully. 

Gravity is the beginning of the beginning, the emergent out of itself. It is a fundamental force that plays the main role in shaping the Universe as we know it. Gravity is mathematically determined by a combination of dimensional and fundamental constants, which enable us to understand its behavior on different scales, from the microscopic to the cosmological. At its core, Gravity is a smooth, deterministic function that is both transformationally invariant and follows the principles of general covariance and the equivalence principle. These principles state that the laws of physics remain unchanged regardless of the coordinate system used to describe them and that Gravity is indistinguishable from any form of acceleration, respectively.
Gravity at the macro level uses the principle of general covariance, which states that the laws of physics look the same in all coordinate systems and is invariant under coordinate transformations.

Gravity at the based level “stage” uses the equivalence principle, which states that Gravity is locally indistinguishable from any form of acceleration and constants and looks the same in all coordinate systems.  

Gravity external and internal use dimensional constants (acceleration) and fundamental constants (orientation) to explain the behavior of Gravity on different scales, from the microscopic scale of atoms to the cosmological scale of the entire Universe.

In General Relativity, Gravity is not a force between two objects as in classical mechanics. Instead, Gravity arises from the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of massive objects. The curvature of spacetime determines the motion of objects, which follow the shortest path, called a geodesic, in the curved spacetime. Massive objects such as planets and stars curve the fabric of spacetime, causing smaller objects to move along curved paths. It has four dimensions because it involves three dimensions of space (length, width, and height) and one-time dimensions. Space and time are combined into a single four-dimensional entity called spacetime.

In Prime Mechanics, Gravity is the Steady State, the emergent force, the attraction of self-positive attraction within time. It is the force that unites all entities in the finite state of spacetime, with each entity having discrete infinity limits known as manifolds. These manifolds are represented by points, dimensions, coordinates, and degree of freedom points, and they determine the impact of matter creation on the curved spacetime, resulting in acceleration along curved paths. Similar to General Relativity, Prime Mechanics also has four dimensions, but it incorporates additional dimensions to describe Gravity’s internal acceleration and orientation. This includes Prime Matter and Prime Energy. These dimensions provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics of Gravity, including its internal and external structure and the forces that govern it.
 

2 minutes ago, Mordred said:

mathematically defined. 

Yes, Prime Mechanic declares, All values, constants deterministically define from the start. Right. Because of the Fundamental Constant. 

We know this as correct. From the Start the constants are the same, never evolved. 

4 minutes ago, Mordred said:

How does one employ prime numbers to define a geometric object ?

Wow, the best question. This is it. 

This is the outline post above: 11 Dimension : Prime Field Grid , Riemann zeta function (Prime Mechanics states as true and shows proofs) 

So yeah... I have to prove the Riemann zeta function. Listen to debunk Prime Mechanic is to disprove zeta... 

Okay so, the Prime Field is based on 0 and 1, everything is station at 1/2. 

Here is a picture of a bump function. 

Prime Mechanics pg, 51

"We will treat the Riemann zeta function as not a purely mathematical object but as a physical system that will be mapped onto the Prime Field as a guide. We will use the critical line section as a one-dimensional ground state for potential energy and excitation with the distribution of Prime Numbers."

The Prime Field is a place for excitation. I am declaring and stating that using Prime Numbers, its distribution we can locate and predicte and plan and determine all locations. Proving determinism, and disproving infinities, uncertainties and chaos. 

So, essentially explaining, Dark Matter as a manifold. We are explaining it as a geometric field. A locality. A place of time and start. we are doing is creating a section and pin-pointing exact location with Zeta 1/2, right the proper distribution of Prime Numbers. 

Causing a chain reaction, a Connection, a Twin Prime Connection. 

What I am proving in the last section is the spooky at a distance also. No such thing as it is like Prime Numbers, especially Twin Prime connection.

Prime Field is a geometric island of stability. A section, a locality, a object, a place for potential energy and extraction and harvestation. 

Prime Mechanic pg, 47 (This might be too advance for non-prime mechanic users) 

 .. . .   . .   . .   .     . .     .   . .   .     .     . .     .   . .     .   .     .       . 

. .   . .   .             .   .     . .         . .     .     .   .     .     . .         . .   . .

          .           .   . .   .     . .         .     .     .     . .     .   . .         .    

      .   . .   .             .     .         . .   .     .       .     .     .   .     .         .

.       .         . .         . .     .   .     .       .   . .   .           .       .   .       .

                                                                                                              (Each dot is a representation of Prime Numbers)

The picture above shows 1 to 500 Prime Numbers positioned across the Prime Field with a positional mapped-out locality. It is where Gravity creates Prime Matter, a discrete unit of blocks—a repeated sequence of orderly functions.
Numbers 7 and 3 and a duality of 73 are spots of containment. This field is an island of stability with calculated measurements on Prime Numbers based on a symmetrical, orderly sequence. A place of curve fitting leads to smoothing and a data point to extract energy. The 73 is an image of a bump function representing a potential energy and starting point of an isolated spot of building blocks. 
 

and continues onwards  

Alleged science, 

Prime Mechanics provides ideas, solutions, and answers to many unresolved scientific problems, including Gravity, Locality, Excitation, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, EPR Paradox, Universal Gravitation Laws, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Unification, Prime Numbers, the Creation of Energy, Poincaré, Riemann, Hodge, Navier–Stokes, Yang-Mills, Birch, and Swinnerton-Dyer, and P versus NP conjectures, among others.

I needed to solve these ideas to solve the theory of everything. I combined them all plus more, many more to publish my works. With proofs, maths and ideas. 

I declare that Gravity is Elemental. It is a Elemental Matter. it is open and a closed system that can be harvested and extract of energy. it is the host of the universe. it is as 1, a finite, infinity limit system. 

Because I am a new member it seems. I will post the scope of the great work called Prime Mechanics. 

Only on high demand of the specific topic requested down below will be post maybe 100% from the book. Only could be demanded on 1 of course. Any one, ask.

Prime Mechanics 

Intro: Explains the book is about the origin of gravity and the creator of everything. 

Part 1:

Chapter 1 Explains the basic of Prime Mechanics, Prime numbers involved, Zeta function and all the connections. it explains it will build a filed. A prime Field. A Field of geometric scale that can excite potential energy. 

Chapter 2: Explains the Prime Field in 11 Dimensions. 

11 Dimension : Prime Field Grid , Riemann zeta function (Prime Mechanics states as true and shows proofs) 

10 Dimension : Yang Mill’s ideas, Mass Gap and proves alot. 

09 Dimension : here I declare "The Unification of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics" = Prime Mechanics, and I explain gauge transformation.

08 Dimension : 

The main ideas will be;
Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture 
The L-function
Re(ζ) ½
 

07 Dimension : More Prime Field, as it is the Geometry of the system. Chains of zeros of Prime Constants, a laminar flow of a diagram 

06 Dimension : distribution of Prime Numbers (Proving Prime Numbers as true). Proving a Finite system. Proving the universe is not infinity and no such thing. 

05 Dimension : The construction of the Field (More Prime Field) 

04 Dimension : 

Let us continue with the Twin Prime ideas and add other concepts to understand this;
Twin Prime
Riemann zeta function
Elliptic curves
 

03 Dimension : 

The introduction of PRIME0, PBIT and Prime Computing
P=0

Prime Mechanics is Yes to P=NP 

02 Dimension :UNIFICATION 

I posted this on Substack, the layers of gravity 

01 Dimension : I state,  "We finally made it to Dimension 1, let us talk about Singularities and Infinities.

Chapter 3: I explain Newton and other Aether ideas  and finalize the proper Aether of Prime Mechanics. incorporating Navier Stoke into it. 

Part 2: Prime Selection.

Chapter 1 : Prove Darwin is correct and the Alien Specie

Chapter 2 : Prove Religion is Earth-based

Chapter 3 Prove Religion is Human made

Part 3: Prime Principle

Explain all the tools, and applications and explain how to create the ultimate A.I Robot. 

Conclusion; end the book from 2007 notes. 

Prime Mechanics March 14, 2023 by Ronald Delamotte 

15 minutes ago, Mordred said:

GR then you should have no problem addressing the fundamental aspects

Sure what is the full question. If this is what you want to know. Prime mechanic is 100% GR, so.... Ask again please. 

Also, substack don't need to subscribe. just click continue reading and scroll to the bottom of March 30 and read upwards. Its all free. The first 7+ post. 

14 minutes ago, Mordred said:

theory smacks of numerology.

Yeah, it was great. Prime Numbers is the key. 

14 minutes ago, Mordred said:

11 dimensions or effective degrees of freedom in describing spacetime.

This is not a conventional dimensions, but a field. A geometric field of manifolds that build upon itself. This is Gravity as a self building block (Prime Matter aka Dark Matter). The degree of freedom and everything is involved. I follow General relativity 100%. Prime Mechanic is beyond it, as a expansion. Gravity is a closed and open system. The 11 dimensions are within it. Within Gravity as a orientation. 

19 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Unfortunately none of the math you have posted answers the latter part.

It was never the point but a single out the post and book as see the first errors. 

20 minutes ago, Mordred said:

geometry

Prime Mechanics as stated above has one and much more detailed and complete. The prime Field is a 11 manifold. A building block of matter. A layering effect that generates and cause Gravity to become Elemental. 

Hence, Elemental gravity = GEM = Gravitational Elemental Matter = Gravity, Energy and Matter. 

22 minutes ago, Mordred said:

curved spacetime

Gravity is not only Curved. It is a element, a transformational manifold that is open and closed. it can be harvested and extracted of its potential energy. 

24 minutes ago, Mordred said:

new membership

Im from 2017, yeah maybe I am still new. Maybe one more post today  

The picture above is the main diagram of Prime Mechanics. It explains in the most simplistic way possible the creation story. 
Gravity as zeros based on Prime Numbers gravitates towards Prime ½, a place between 0 and 1. This region is a confinement area, a placeholder that densifies and creates Prime Matter, a vessel, and a place to build a rarefication called Aether, Prime Energy. 

Every word has been reformatted, changed, and embellished. 

"Aether, Steady State, and Dark Matter and Dark Energy has been fully explained and expanded upon in Prime Mechanics. 

Steady State is Gravity.

Aether is the equilibrium point, "the center" and much more.

Dark Matter and Dark Energy is Gravity itself. 

Gravity created everything. Every single force, Fundamental Dimensional constants. Everything. 

We live in a Steady State system, with a physical creation at the equilibrium point. 

I placed this here right away as speculation on others but this is my theory and my belief. Please disprove it and debunk it. I am serious because I need to know. The debunk is not this amateur post but my book as a whole. Not telling to buy the book but click on "see book" on amazon and debunk the first 8 pages or substack stuff but it should be the book. 

If not, I will place myself;

Newton = Gravity (Principia)

Einstein = Gravity (General Relativity)

Delamotte = Gravity (Prime Mechanics)

Only three people got it right. 

March 14, 2023 I published Prime Mechanics. 

"Prime Mechanics is based on a science that follows the laws of Prime Physics. The main subject is based on The Origin of Gravity and provides a complete singular framework for the Theory of Everything."  

I already started here: https://primemechanics.substack.com/archive

Abstract — Elemental Gravity is a cosmological model proposed by the book called Prime 
Mechanics that posits Gravity as the Steady State and the creator of the universe. According to this 
model, spacetime fabric is Gravity, and it represents the Steady State, which unifies Dark Energy, 
Dark Matter, and the fundamental forces as one entity. Dark Matter and Dark Energy are not 
separate substances but properties of the universe itself. Its dimensional topological spacetime 
field consists of multi-layered homogeneous curvature planes known as Prime Fields. These fields 
are determined mathematically using fundamental and dimensional constants that converge 
towards an equilibrium point of ½ between 0 and 1 based on Prime Numbers. This convergence 
leads to a rarefaction, which marks the beginning of creation.

Elemental Gravity 
Gravity is the beginning of the beginning, the emergent out of itself. It is a fundamental force that 
plays a crucial role in shaping the universe as we know it. Gravity is mathematically determined 
by a combination of dimensional and fundamental constants, which enable us to understand its 
behavior on different scales, from the microscopic to the cosmological. At its core, Gravity is a 
smooth, deterministic function that is both transformationally invariant and follows the principles 
of general covariance and the equivalence principle. These principles state that the laws of physics 
remain unchanged regardless of the coordinate system used to describe them and that Gravity is 
indistinguishable from any form of acceleration, respectively.
The principle of general covariance states that the laws of physics look the same in all coordinate 
systems and is invariant under coordinate transformations.
The equivalence principle states that Gravity is locally indistinguishable from any form of
acceleration and constants and looks the same in all coordinate systems. 

In General Relativity, Gravity is not a force between two objects as in classical mechanics. Instead, 
Gravity arises from the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of massive objects. The 
curvature of spacetime determines the motion of objects, which follow the shortest path, called 
geodesic. Massive objects such as planets and stars curve the fabric of spacetime, causing smaller 
objects to move along curved paths. It has four dimensions because it involves three dimensions 
of space (length, width, and height) and one-time dimensions. Space and time are combined into 
a single four-dimensional entity called spacetime.

In Prime Mechanics, Gravity is the Steady State, the emergent force, the attraction of self-positive 
attraction within time. It is the force that unites all entities in the finite State of spacetime, with 
each entity having discrete infinity limits known as manifolds. These manifolds are represented by 
points, dimensions, coordinates, and degree of freedom points, and they determine the impact of 
Matter creation on the curved spacetime, resulting in acceleration along curved paths. Similar to 
General Relativity, Prime Mechanics also has four dimensions, but it incorporates additional 
dimensions to describe Gravity’s internal acceleration and orientation. This includes Dark Matter
and Dark Energy. These dimensions provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics of 
Gravity, including its internal and external structure and the forces that govern it.
Gravity is a dimensional topological curvature of a spacetime manifold. Its curvature and
substance are Dark Matter, a transparent geometric structure within the confinement of the 11-
dimension. On the surface, it is a flat homogeneous elemental fabric structure with stages in which 
objects can move, and universally it can be stretched, bent, curved, and punctured by the presence 
of mass and energy. Spacetime is not limited to four dimensions. In Prime Mechanics, it can be 
described as an 11-dimensional manifold. This manifold can be discrete and continuous, meaning 
it can have both discrete and continuous points and be connected to other manifolds. This allows 
for the inheritance of properties from one manifold to another and the addition of new features to 
a given manifold.

This means that Gravity is an elemental materialized dimensional steady-state force. This 
elemental dimensional force is a transformational orientation of an 11-dimensional manifold with 
a determined path of external influences from mass and energy in the universe. The effects of 
Gravity can be seen on all scales, from the motion of planets and stars to the bending of light by 
massive objects like galaxies.

Gravity arises from the collective behavior of many individual particles or entities, like Dark
Matter. It can exchange energy and momentum with other physical systems and Matter, exchange 
gravitational energy and momentum, and remain conserved. The system, the mass density that 
Dark Matter centers and overlaps and creates manifolds, is the fundamental building block of Dark
Matter, generating proto-mass/electric charge, serving as the origin of time and energy. This makes 
Gravity a two-system, open and closed elemental system. 

S_phi = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi - V(phi)]
where:

S_phi is the action for the scalar field phi in 11-dimensional spacetime
∫ d^11x denotes the 11-dimensional integral over all spacetime coordinates
√|g| is the square root of the determinant of the 11-dimensional metric tensor g_{ij}, which 
describes the geometry of spacetime

g^{ij} is the inverse of the 11-dimensional metric tensor g_{ij}
∂_i phi is the partial derivative of the scalar field phi with respect to the i-th coordinate
V(phi) is the potential energy function of the scalar field phi
This action describes the dynamics of a scalar field in 11-dimensional spacetime, including its 
kinetic energy and potential energy. The equations of motion for the scalar field can be derived by 
varying this action with respect to the scalar field phi.

The action is a scalar quantity that describes the dynamics of the scalar field phi in 11-dimensional 
spacetime, taking into account the effects of Gravity, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy through the 
11-dimensional metric tensor g^{ij}. The action is used to derive the equations of motion for the 
scalar field phi, which describes how the field evolves in time and space.

The action in this equation is a proposed theory of everything that attempts to unify all fundamental 
forces and particles in physics. The first term describes the kinetic energy of the field, while the 
second term describes its potential energy. The equation is integrated over all 11 dimensions of 
spacetime, and the resulting value gives information about the overall behavior of the field. The 
equations of motion for the field are derived by varying the action with respect to the field, which 
yields the equations that describe how the field evolves over time and space.

Simple answers: 

1. what is a 'god'

Answer: A imagination of a human being creative thought

2. how could a 'god' be

Answer: By the actions of a man to convince himself and dupe others in the creation of a physical entity.  

3. what proof is there of a 'god'

Answer: The domination of a ruler A.K.A Man to rule and judge over other human beings gives a sense of a God. 

4. how do you know the bible or some other religious book wasn't just some storybook for kids to behave way back when.

It wasnt. The bible is just a history book for a generation to keep on going. A record book. Stolen stories from others 

5. when you now look at the evidence is the possibility of a 'god' real or not?

Yes. By using current science and money Human being can live forever like a eternal God. But still being weak as a machine and an organism 

6. how would a 'god' exist/ be made?

It only exist in the mind of an adult man/woman . All babies are born atheist 

I think a easy way to explain this is Elementary particles have spin. A 3 degree freedom function. 

1. charge

2. Spin

3. Orbital

momentum of a massless particle can in theory create a gravitational field 

On 8/24/2017 at 7:46 PM, Moontanman said:

I think maybe this one is the best: It's interactive. 

 

Where are you guys getting these awesome pictures From? 

10 hours ago, DrKrettin said:

I've just remembered that I wanted to comment on this. It is a perfectly usual word (attested 130 times, twice in the bible) which is the 1st sing. active perfect indicative of the verb eurisko to discover, find out. So it means "I have discovered (it)" and was (probably) pronounced HOO-re-ka. This is in stark contrast to the present-day attempt of yoo-REE-ka

The Greek Septuagint was written around 400 A.D 

Archimedes was born around 200 B.C

Translation of it from Hebrew to Greek around 400 A.D and put in the word "Eureka" 

Translated: I have found among the exiles from Judah a man who will make known to the king. From Daniel 2.25

"I have found" replace with the word "Eureka"

Only 2 times the word was used. One time in Daniel and another time in Hosea 

And both times "I have found" is replaced with "Eureka" or another way to write it in a similar way. 

Also even thou the word was used 130x. Archimedes made it famous. 

For example: Darwin made evolution mainstream and famous. But so many others was talking about it and already wrote about it before him. 

1 hour ago, dimreepr said:

Indeed +1, but the baron has a different agenda...

Hahaha. No I do not have an agenda.

He asked.

I wrote for fun about it. He asked me an argument on it and I wrote a response. 

I didn't want him guessing why the heck I said that and ran away without any feedback 

Socrates is a mix bag of everything. He resembles Jesus without any divine abilities. A teacher/philosopher/poet and mentor. Never wrote a single word on paper and taught many and was prosecuted for his belief. Just like Jesus, Socrates death and philosophy inspire his pupils to follow and write stories about him afterwards.  

Maybe the argument could be he was just like Mohammad or Homer a illiterate individual who others wrote wonders about. Or those individuals are the real authors of their figment of imagination to create a hero / antitype. 

Plato was a proflic profound remarkable writer. It's easy to say of course it was him. Penmanship like Plato could of easily wrote about a person name Socrates. 

Out of everyone in Athens only 2 people met Socrates? Plato and Xenophon. Come on this is a little weird now... at least Jesus had more than that.

and than the usual suspects plays in. Every time some one tries to describe him or talk about him, contradiction happens. Cough cough Jesus. 

and what's weird is why did Socrates die? What did he die For? The answer is for his beliefs? Well Plato documented on paper his beliefs. Why didn't Plato get hang or poison. 

next topic..............

Of course there were gods before the Greeks.

The argument was the Greeks story telling and creations of them. The inventions of hundreds of demons and gods and hero's was on a whole different level compare to the Egyptians or Sumerians. 

and yes I only scratches the surface. If this was about the Phoenicians or akkadian or old and new Egypt and Sumerian and India it will take forever to write everything. 

Each country and empire I name could easily be about 500 pages of information of inventions and discoveries 

My goodness the Romans alone 10,000 pages can be written on them and still we be at 75% there. 

So yes. 

Again I pretty much listed in a common sense way here on this page everything an average Joe needs to write a 2 page report on ancient Greek. 

So yea i emphasis, I pretty much wrote everything a school assignment paper needs 

Cheers

7 hours ago, DrKrettin said:

There is enough contentious material here for several threads, but not much science.

Interesting that people have listed a great many things, but nobody has mentioned two of the most culturally significant inventions: rhetoric and drama (both comedy and tragedy)

That last list was for fun. Of course it's not scientific. You did read the fun part right?

And also rhetoric and drama and comedy and tragedy can easily be label next to my personal favorites.

Plato invention of Socrates - Well this could be classified as rhetoric and comedy 

And 

Greeks inventions of Gods/Demons - this can be classified as drama and tragedy 

Sorry bud I pretty much listed everything

Cheers 

P.S. now don't start the insulting wars for no reason

Greek inventions:

Hydraulic wheel 

Cement 

Analog computer

Odometer 

Umbrella 

Cranes

Papanicolaou test

Alarm clock 

Sieve of Eratosthenes

Catapult 

Cartography 

Automatic door

Archimedes’ Screw aka "screwdriver"

Basic Medicine 

Concept of democracy 

Coined money 

Basic heating (not like how the Romans did it thou)

Anchor 

------------------------------------------------ 

My own personal favorites: (For fun) 

Plato invention of Socrates 

Aristotle imagination 

Greeks inventions of Gods/Demons 

Invention of miliarty Sparta 

Greek astronomy 

Normalised homosexuality 

Invention of the word "Eureka"

Invention of Hydrostatics 

Law courts 

2 hours ago, Moontanman said:

I am more than willing to entertain the idea of god, fairies (and all the other pagan things), angels, demons,  the supernatural in general just as soon as someone offers some evidence a bit more substantial than "what else could it be" or feelies, or a hunch. Mike, be serious, I can make a much better case for aliens visiting the Earth than your "feeling of connection" Would you be willing to believe such an improbable thing as the Hollow Earth just because I said I had a feeling it was true? 

Your idea of god sounds quite a bit like the idea of ancient astronauts crossed with magic. I cannot in good faith even meet you .1% of the way on this Mike...  

Lol that is a little harsh.. I meet him at 25% the bare minimum. Why? Well his view points are basic theological belief system. And my assumption he and most likely you and others here not familiar with jewish kabbalah.

Long time ago I study the logos system and he's getting to somewhat to those types of points. It's pointless and useless now these days but in a mystical sense it's attractive. Not to me thou. I consider it folly. 

3 hours ago, Mike Smith Cosmos said:

.

Well , you all seem to say , Many people have commented and done research on 

HEIRACHY AMONG LIVING SPECIES.

Before I started this thread . , I was unaware of this . I coined the HIERACHY idea apparently after a long period , where others had used this Classification. 

HOWEVER ,  I do not see much so far which list , GOD ... HUMANS... FISH as a distinct HEIRACHY. This is perhaps because I am deliberately trying to forge a link, across these three species . Because they are there ...and I have access to all three. Two by dint of Birth and one by (Records , observation and Experience.) Or at least that is the proposal ! 

So , although I can recognise these other HEIRACHY 's represent a lot of research by scientists over the years . I am particularly interested in establishing the specific HIERACHY which I have personally been discussing . This so because it at least uses evidence produced by at least 2 , layers in the HIERACHY, and using much of Human History ' en mass', can establish the third member of the HIERACHY , beyond reasonable doubt, IF ONE IS PREPARED TO TAKE THE WHOLE EARTH SYSTEM AS THE PROOF , RATHER THAN AN INDIVIDUAL ENTITY . This we do with some of the other members of Heirachies , say the human being . Where we take individual cells , liquids , systems , to come together to make an individual human being ? 

This could be likened to a biological research establishment . Doing deep research and development over a number of years. Finally coming up with a drug that is used in treating xxxxxxxx. 

Similarly , I am saying a research and development organisation of immense proportions ( called GOD ) many , many years ago produced , amongst many other things , a species called MAN . After a great deal of brainpower, effort and manufacture . (Similarly with FISH , amongst many other things ) . Having previously done a lot of other work on atoms  , minerals , and particles. 

Mike 

 

 

Hello Mike,

What you are trying to get at will not be in science sadly. I have a feeling with the the absolute hard evidence of science will not convince your conscious. Even if I produce the best possible scientific research and evidences to you, you will look the other way because you won't be fully satisfy. I think you reach a certain level at your age you don't want empirical evidence anymore. But a spiritual awakening of some sort? 

You might be at the wrong place than. 

I can show you another path. A path I long abandon but is tattoo into my brain. It will take you deep down the hole. And it's full of opposite evidence that is found in this forum. I have a feeling this is the path you want to get into.......

You can start here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkabah_mysticism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Heavens

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zohar  - I wasted 10 years in this category!!!! 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sefirot - couple of years on this !!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seder_hishtalshelus - here comes the rabbit holes of 1 out of a million

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_life_(Kabbalah)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hekhalot_literature

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ein_Sof

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Throne_of_God

This is the path I have a feeling you want. This is where you want to be at. Science has the answer. But science dose not have these mystical strange answers. 

Good luck. Best of luck. This stuff is not easy to decipher. I wasted a decade on this sadly 

On 7/17/2017 at 9:49 AM, Itoero said:

Dawkins uses the term "selfish gene" as a way of expressing the gene-centred view of evolution.

In the foreword to the book's 30th-anniversary edition, Dawkins said he "can readily see that [the book's title] might give an inadequate impression of its contents" and in retrospect thinks he should have taken Tom Maschler's advice and called the book The Immortal Gene.

Thank zeus he never did that!! 

Selfish Gene was absolutely thought provoking by its title and it's content. 

39 minutes ago, exalosinanos said:

"God is the Supreme Intelligence-First Cause of all things."

God is eternal. If He had a beginning, He must either have sprung from nothing, or have been created by some being anterior to Himself. It Is thus mat, step by step, we arrive at the idea of infinity and eternity.
God is unchangeable. If He were subject to change, the laws which rule the universe would have no stability.
God is immaterial, that is to say, that His nature differs from every-thing that we call matter, or otherwise. He would not be unchangeable, for He would be subject to the transformations of matter.
God is unique. If there were several Gods, there would be neither unity of plan nor unity of power in the ordaining of the universe.
God is all-powerful because He is unique. If He did not possess sovereign power, there would be something more powerful, or no less powerful, than Himself. He would not have created all things and those which He had not created would be the work of another God.
God is sovereignty just and good. The providential wisdom of the divine laws Is revealed as clearly In the smallest things as In the greatest and this wisdom renders it impossible to doubt either His justice or His goodness.

God has filled the mind of man with darkness, and kept him in ignorance of his real duties and true interests. It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Gods, that we shall discover Truth, Reason, and Morality. God diverts us from the causes of evils, and from the remedies which nature prescribes; far from curing, it only aggravates, multiplies, and perpetuates them

"The definition of God is the downfall of humanity"

20 hours ago, Area54 said:

Whoa there!. Certainly there are Hierarchies of various kinds within the universe at large and life in particular. My objection to Mike is that he has failed utterly to justify the kind of hierarchy he claims exists, or to counter evidence that calls it into serious question. Strange appears to be rejecting the same specific hierarchy of Mike that Moontanman, myself and probably others have questioned in this thread.

That hierarchy has two essential components. Man is above all other terrestrial life forms and their are others entities above man. Mike has failed to offer a cogent argument for the first (though one could be made) and failed to provide evidence for the latter (perhaps because nothing substantial exists).

Further, your suggestion that the concept dates from the 1980s is simply wrong. The Great Chain of Being, the prototypical hierarchy, derived from the writings of Plato and Aristotle was fully established in the Middle Ages. It was probably, in part, responsible for the development, by Linnaeus, of the biological classification system, which is inherently hierarchical. One could select more examples from the past couple of centuries. I'll throw in one more. Nikolaas Tinbergen's work in the 50s and 60s, wherein he helped develop ethology, was essentially a recognition and investigation of biological hierarchies.

Wait a minute.

The concept of the date was not the period of how we discover this process! Of course I know the Greeks knew this! And over time through theological belief of God and hierarchy we thoroughly ponder on it more. And than the middle ages theologians/philosophers developed a better understanding of it but not as scientific of it untill the 19th century. 

I did a poor job in mentioning that I was quoting a professor from the 1980. 

Eminent paleontologist and evolutionist Niles Eldredge since the 1980’s, came up with the hierarchy theory 

And it's fascinating 

I am bad at citation 

http://hierarchygroup.com/home/hierarchy-theory-of-evolution/

And I wanted to add more to this base on Niles Eldredge hierarchy theory.

 I think he nails it. 

"Hierarchy theory identifies two different hierarchies: one is named ‘economic’ or ‘ecological’, and it is based on matter-energy transfers and ecological processes. The other is named ‘genealogical’ or ‘evolutionary’, and it is based on information and replication".

I think this is where people need to get at. And try to pin point what area of interest is the most dominant aspect of hierarchy. 

btw I believe there is a hierarchy. Not a mystical one but a common sense natural one. 

Cheers

On 8/16/2017 at 11:35 PM, dstebbins said:

 

So what gives? Why is gold still so valuable?

This is a easy one:

Gold dose not oxidize. 

Gold is highly efficient conductor 

Gold is free from corrosion 

Gold is helping with arthritis

Gold has been used for over 4000 years. And it is the most beautiful and scared item of all time. 

Gold is flexible and malleable

Gold is good for like to absorb heat. Great for space travelling 

Gold is rare and hard to come across and it is a perfect unit for currency exchange.

Gold is not toxic 

And 1 thousands more important values for gold 

On 6/20/2017 at 2:56 AM, Strange said:

I don't see a hierarchy. At best there is a (partially) directed graph. You can choose different organisms to be on "top" depending on your criteria.

 

If there were a hierarchy, I see no need (or likelihood) for it to extend infinitely in both directions, so the question "who is above" (or below) is not necessarily meaningful.

I completely disagree.

Hierarchy is an evolutionary movement. If you look at it in a biological perspective you realize that smaller units form all the components of the larger system. Examples, cells, organism, organs, trees in forests etch.. This idea was from the 1980s. Hierarchy formed out of simplistic multi level structure to complex deterministic phenomena. And this works in all categories. Especially in human being who will to the end of time will always look upwards and advance himself to become stronger. 

And the question is  "who is above or below" is the thing that humans will always have in mind to strive to and not become to. 

44 minutes ago, martillo said:

I must admit, not so easy. For some "God" make a creation and remain just observing it the rest of the existence seems unlikely... But what if the Universe needs maintenance? For instance what if unavoidable problems arises in surged worlds with the living beings that surged (spontaneously, following evolution of course) and could guide the beings' intuition some way to solve the problems? What about that?

Thinking how you think we will never get rid of this errorness monstrous idea call a "God". Evolution dose not need a pervert sky man to over look things. 

The definition of God is the downfall of humanity 

11 hours ago, Manticore said:

Not just religious - specifically Christian. I was having my morning coffee a few weeks ago and noticed the TV was set to a Muslim show. Instead of preaching, the Imam put down the Quran and gave his audience a (very good) lecture on global warming.

Yes... 

The argument I always get constantly is,

"Why are we wasting tax payer money on a hoax.

"This is only earth the real paradise is in heaven". 

"Well about 3% of scientist disagree with global warming so it is 110% false! 

"Please stop you are hurting my feelings, I only care of heaven and Jesus. Not this baloney conspiracy.

"It is a propangada that the left wing government made up" only Jesus is truth.

"Global warming is a lie but because the earth is flat.

"How can there be global warming, if the earth is only 6000 years old?..............

I am Not exaggerating these are what religious people say to me all the time. 

SMGDH

-The Growth of Biological Thought by Ernst Mayr 

-The Selfish Gene by Richdard Dawkins 

-Population Biology of Plants by John Harper

-Origin of Species by Charles Darwin

-The eighth day of creation by Horaces Judson (Very detail) 

-The Growth of Biological Thought by Ernst Mary

-Silent Spring by Rachel Carson 

I think you are talking about "Fermi level" not "Fermi Energy". 

Isn't Fermi Level have to do with more with chemicals at the highest level but at zero ?

And Fermi Energy have to do with more with gases at the lowest level at zero?

Not related but related, I heard that only through Fermi laws we will achieve the "Speed of light technology and Warp Speed" .