Baron d'Holbach

My words brings explosions of nuclear blast to the face of timid religious zealots 

No need to debate about imaginary phantoms. And the imaginary friends that the meek and timid zealots created from their feeble minds. 

Be Free man. Follow common sense and the pursuit of justice of common sense. Not fear and delusional thoughts that brings upon error. 

20 minutes ago, DrP said:

You can edit a previous post  -  you don't have to have 6 consecutive ones you know?

Are these your own musings or cut and pasted quotes? They look like quotes  -  You should probably acknowledge the original authors.

It is by me Baron D'Holbach. The father of atheism. The man who put fear to meek, timid religious zealots. The sheep's who get on their knees to let others take advantage of them. 

It is thus religion infatuates man from his infancy, fills him with vanity and fanaticism: if he has a heated imagination it drives him on to fury; if he has activity, it makes him a madman, who is frequently as cruel to himself, as he is dangerous and incommodious to others: if, on the contrary, he be phlegmatic or of a slothful habit, he becomes melancholy and is useless to society.

"The definition of a god is the downfall of mankind"

By Baron D'Holbach

Religion has ever filled the mind of man with darkness, and kept him in ignorance of his real duties and true interests. It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover Truth. 

Truth is not religion or any monstrous sky gods. 

The fall of man is in the belief of a sky god. 

By Baron D'Holbach

Man has been forced to vegetate in his primitive stupidity: he has been taught stories about invisible powers upon whom his happiness was supposed to depend. Occupied solely by his fears, and by unintelligible reveries, he has always been at the mercy of priests, who have reserved to themselves the right of thinking for him, and of directing his actions.

By Baron D'Holbach

How could the human mind progress, while tormented with frightful phantoms, and guided by men, interested in perpetuating its ignorance and fears?

"God is the foundation for the fall of mankind"

All children are atheists, they have no idea of God

Adults are an insult to children. With their made up delusional monsters 

If the ignorance of nature gave birth to such a variety of gods, the knowledge of this nature is calculated to destroy them.

All religious notions are uniformly founded on authority; all the religions of the world forbid examination, and are not disposed that men should reason upon them.

Only timid and weak minded individuals need a sky god. 

By BD

5 minutes ago, beecee said:

My mind is open but not so open that my brains have or will fall out.

 

5 minutes ago, Moontanman said:

 

What is best in life?

To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

Pharaohs, Nimrod the great , Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Nero Caesar, Genghis khan, Adolf Hitler, Josephus Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot,

And our future dominated leaders that will come on crush us!

I am just saying, this is life. There will be another maniac and could be the most lethal to us ALL!

2 hours ago, beecee said:

Perhaps you need to listen to everyone, because really what you have said, is jumbled nonsense.

Dude of course I listen and you know the answer they give? "Well sir we all don't know'.... Yadayadaya... boring.

Well than I reply 'get out of my god damn way'. And I will lay forth the answers.

Its okay that you close your mind on it. I have about a good solid 5 theories on it.  And my Wave theory is one of them. And of course I simplified my wave theory here. it is much more complicated and more depth to it.

I will lay forth the System of Nature

4 hours ago, TripleA said:

I know improving things is different from person to person. Yet, it's still improving one aspect or another of the world around you

The reason I said the meaning of life is to improve, is to make a way for a person to feel their life is meaningful. You could say your life is meaningful, but you should think what made it so. In the end you probably improved something, if you think hard enough

 

 In order to dominate, you must improve your skills, military, or any other thing that you are using in domination. Your meaning would fall under mine.

You are wrong on that. Primitive animals never had military or skills to dominate a foe. They used brute force. And by brute force I will win over you!

Why we still believe in God. It is very simple. 

Human beings are fragile animals. Feeble and meek. Afraid and timid. 

Meaning of life is domination. War And conquer. 

6 hours ago, mistermack said:

No prizes, you're not the first to suggest it.  

Of course, the LACK of fossils outside of the known evolutionary sequences is good evidence FOR evolution.

If your rabbit scenario happened, the first question would be, 'do we know the full history of rabbit evolution?'

This new rabbit might be just adding to our knowledge, although it looks out of place at the moment. If we have a complete sequence of rabbit fossils, going from primitive to modern, over 50,000 years, and then you find this modern one dated at 75,000 years, you would want to look very closely, to see if there are any differences, because it might be a case of parallel evolution, producing a very similar rabbit to the modern one, going back more than 75,000 years, and then going extinct. Not very likely, but an expert should be able to tell.

Another possibility is that someone has doctored a later fossil with carbon isotopes, to make it give a false age reading.

Another possibility is that the dating system is at fault, rather than the theory of evolution. None of it is very likely though, so it would certainly cause a stir.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sad to hear about the lack of a prize. 

But to continue. I should of put in that we do know the full history of rabbits as the full example. And it is a shame that some might doctored a false fact to prove a point. 

So yes I can only see this as the ultimate stir for evolution. 

14 hours ago, beecee said:

Well at least you get a point for recognising it as gobbldydook, because really it just plainly lacks any common sense and gobblydook is all it is.... 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibberish

Gibberish, jibberish, jibber-jabber, and gobbledygook refer to speech or other use of language that is nonsense, or what the listener believes to be nonsense.

 

But hey, if that's what you want to take to the grave, be my guest! Don't let me rain on your parade. 

I came up with it in the early 2000s when I was about 14 years old. 

It was a combination of Gravitational wave theory, String theory and the wave equation with a spice of my thinking on it. Haven't seen a better explanination then the one I simply laid forth.

All i ever get from everyone is no one knows, stop the nonsense, stop the gibberish and it's gobbledygook.

Owell

2 hours ago, beecee said:

No argument there.

 

 The elementary particle of EMR, is the photon which includes light.

We have absolutely no knowledge of anything before 10-43 seconds after the BB event.

We are able to reasonably speculate, sure, but what you speculate does not appear reasonable to me at least...gobbldydook, yes maybe.

Fluctuations in the quantum foam from which the BB emerged is far more scientific reasoning.  

Of course it is gobbldydook.....

BUT ITS MINE gobbldydook. That's my speculated gobbldydook.

And I will take it to the grave until someone disproves it

Evolution is 99.99% correct. It is impossible to disprove it.

There is no alternative facts or theories beside evolution!

Okay now lets have some fun.......

If there was any way to disprove it, it is by this practical example I will lay forth. And pretty much this is the only way to disprove it. The possibilities for this is 00.01%

I am going to use an example to illustrate how it can be disproven but this has never been done and there is no evidence for it! And most likely nothing will ever arise.

Example,

Lets pick a rabbit as the example in disproving evolution.

Lets say that primitive rabbits evolved into modern rabbits 10,000 years ago. And from 10,000 years onward to present time rabbits at that early state is still the same modern rabbit we know them now. Right. Modern rabbit from 10,000 years ago is the same cute rabbit as we know them now

Throughout the 10,000 years we have dig fossils after fossil and with the help of radiometric dating and such we realize that each ancient rabbit we dig up, lets say 5,000 years ago or 750 years ago it is the same modern rabbit that we estimated to be that evolved 10,000 years ago. Noting surprising at all here right.

Next we kept on digging and digging and we found rabbits 35,000 years ago and 15,000 years ago and we came to a collective agreement these are primitive rabbits that still didn't evolved into modern rabbits yet. This proves that everything is correct and evolution of rabbits follows the path to modernization couple of thousands years later.

hope you following along.

Now what if one day we dig a rabbit that was modern but was dated 75,000 years ago! We double check and re-did the radiometric dating and such and it kept on saying this modern rabbit is in fact 75,000 years old. This will pretty much dismantle evolution.

This type of discovery disproves evolution. Not as a whole but takes the 99.99% fact to about 60% to even lower.

This automatically debunk the evolution process, the genetic line, the data genes, linage line, almost disrupts everything..

Cheers

Where's my prize now!  

Yes it is easy. All you have to do is change the weight of the EM field and manipulate it through force.

There was a paper on it. U.S.A government was working on it. Something in the line of Extra-Low Frequency electromagnetic massless motion theory or something.

Btw it is not easy. but onces we master it which will happen it will become second nature. Why we need this? WRAP DRIVE!

I have to disagree with a lot of things he has to say. He got it all wrong.

Light is part of the Wave-particle duality concept. And not to my surprise he dismiss the whole 'Wave theory' altogether. It seems like he refuse to accept the invisible motion of space. And with his refusal of it, he will never accept that light is pretty much a photon that is part of the whole electromagnetic field and its interaction with itself and the 4 principles of nature.

Just tell him that existences before the big bang was not build on solid foundation but on WAVES. Waves ebbing and flowing through infinite of untold time. Until the day that the waves compress within each other and combust and blew up. That's how the big bang started. The beginning of the human light started 14 billion years ago.

The question is how did the waves started? The waves of existences was always here and will never disappear. Human beings like death and resurrections. But waves have no concept of that.

Copyright by me ! I solved the riddle of life.

You guys are welcome

P.S. If you guys haven't notice yet this guy is religious ! This is the same Christian minded ideas that faith minded individuals have.

I am surprise this question has to be even raise up. Of course there going to be revolutions in the near future. I could list one thousands revolutions that most likely going to arise and probably will.