Jump to content

exchemist

Senior Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by exchemist

  1. Yes, I suppose with a court challenge pending the lawyers will want to control carefully any messages from staff that might be seen as evidence of political attitudes at the instiution.
  2. While I have little interest in the videos, the title of your thread expresses a profound truth abut the physical world, I think. When I was studying at university I was very much impressed with statistical thermodynamics. That subject is concerned with showing how "random" behaviour at the level of atoms and molecules (random in inverted commas because the atoms and molecules of course remain subject to the laws of physics) quite naturally leads to all manner of highly ordered bulk properties and behaviour of matter, from temperature, physical changes of state and heat capacity through to chemical equilibria and rates of reaction. Stat TD was described by Peter Atkins as one of the two great pillars of physical chemistry, the other being quantum theory. I found both extraordinarily mind-expanding.
  3. Thanks. I presume what this means is he is too occupied with the issue of how to fight to retain academic independence to have the time to write his blog. Fair enough. What is especially sinister about this is that he has found it necessary to take down this explanatory text after posting it, presumably for fear of retribution, either against him personally or against his department. That alone speaks volumes.
  4. I went to his blog to try to find something about QFT that I don’t understand and found this alarming entry: https://profmattstrassler.com/2025/04/17/blog-on-indefinite-pause/ The original message seems to have been deleted and all that remains are the replies, which suggest Strassler has been got at by Trump’s gauleiters. Does anyone know what’s going on here? Has he lost his position?
  5. exchemist replied to DrmDoc's topic in The Lounge
    Today I learned that Gadolinium is put in your veins when you have an MRI scan (i.e. NMR, but they don't call it that because anything "nookular" puts the fear of God into patients), to provide contrast, as it is paramagnetic. In fact the Gd 3+ ion, which is what they use, chelated suitably as it would otherwise be toxic, has 7 unpaired electrons - a half filled 4f subshell. So loads of both spin and orbital angular momentum. This was one of many things that I focused on while lying supine on the table. It's a bloody boring - and noisy - procedure. But the Irish radiographer was rather cute.
  6. Yes, I agree the Jewish OT God seems a lot less loving than the Christian one. The Jewish God is more of a military protector of the tribes of Israel, mostly.
  7. That is judgement rather than beneficence, surely?
  8. There seems to be some inconsistency in the Basic Directions. If you are to add powder directly to the water source and not premix in smaller volumes, is there a missing "not" in the statement "Do add water to powder", i.e. should it read "Do not add water to powder"? The statement that you are not to mix in smaller volumes of water implies you should not do what you are proposing. But I must admit I am not sure why this would be. I can't see how you are supposed to achieve uniform dispersal throughout a large volume of water by adding powder directly. One other point is I think you need something to activate the sodium chlorite to release ClO2. This can be done by chlorine or acid, including any natural acidity of the water, if present. are there no directions about this?
  9. This seems to have nothing to do with Newton or the Royal Mint.
  10. Well if Y is not counted as a vowel there are words of Greek origin, since English tends to transliterate the Greek υ as y. So we've made a vowel into a consonant. Things like rhythm, sylph and so on.
  11. Do you count Y as a vowel for this purpose?
  12. I suggest you produce a new list of your steps 1-10 but this time you show the energy input or output for each step. But at least this time you seem to be achieving a net conversion of methanol + atmospheric oxygen to water and CO2, which will give you a net energy release. So that's a step in the right diirection. 🙂
  13. Yes I’m sure it is possible in principle to synthesise smells by suitable nerve stimulation. You say this has been done. Can you provide a link to a report of this work, so that we can read about it?
  14. The last sentence is gibberish. Can you rephrase so it means something, or are you just another nutcase?
  15. Exactly. The pope picture was another distraction stunt, too. “Hey, look over there!”……… It all makes it harder for opposition, whether political, media, the courts or the public, to focus and identify what is urgent or most important to resist. Trump has been about disorientation from the beginning, gaslighting the public so they can’t tell fact from fiction. Now the technique is being expanded to confuse damage to vital mechanisms of democracy with a load of other, eye-catching stuff.
  16. If E means energy, p means momentum, m means mass and c means the speed of light, then your formula is dimensionally incorrect, so it must be wrong.
  17. Why don’t you contact Tyson then? He is not a contributor here.
  18. Don’t be silly. There has been centrally issued coinage since at least Roman times. Newton was merely one holder of the office of Master of the Mint in the reign of William III (Mary having died by then). The Royal Mint itself has existed in England from the c.12th.
  19. From your recent posts I think you might speak to a doctor. You do not seem to me to be in a healthy frame of mind. But it is normal practice when walking in the countryside to greet people you encounter, just a simple bonjour and a smile, which you do not do in the city because there are people everywhere.
  20. The problem is there is no net energy release generated by the process. You have to put in energy to electrolyse water into oxygen and hydrogen. And you have to put in more energy to ionise hydrogen into a proton and an electron. The energy released by recombining these into water only recovers the energy you had to provide to split them, and no more. So this device achieves nothing.
  21. I think this idea may only apply to the Abrahamic religions. The Ancient Greek and Roman gods did not exhibit beneficence, or only some of them, some of the time. Also I’m not sure if it is true of the Hindu pantheon. The Abrahamic religions cast God in the role of father. As such, God is disposed to care for his children. A father does not demand anything of his child, but he wants him or her to be happy. I think that’s the general idea, at least.
  22. Notably the abandonment of habeas corpus, which Stephen Miller is now trailing. Get the MAGA idiots all pumped up at the idea of being "tough" by sending "bad guys" to Alcatraz, while denying the rule of law to anyone the Executive dislikes enough to arrest.
  23. No, it doesn’t work like that.
  24. exchemist replied to Gian's topic in Chemistry
    Re yr 1, I would think that yes, since the temperature at the surface is below the boiling point of ethane and acetylene, these compounds will fall out of the atmosphere. As “rain”, maybe? Re yr3, yes methane is a greenhouse gas so will absorb and re-radiate in the infra red. Nitrogen and hydrogen however will be transparent to IR, having no dipole in the molecule.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.