Butch

I am in favor of fec, next year however if there is not a tax cut business will not have that incentive. The only real incentive is paying to keep good people. I don't see your point about my "BS argument" cutting taxes on business will benefit everybody in this country, it will also encourage workers to strike out on their own. America is a world leader.

If they are going to give raises and/or bonuses it is best they do it now, and that is because taxes are being cut. Sounds like free enterprise capitalism.

What about that substantive argument, a tax deduction does not return the entire cost, so where is the incentive? Yes, but at least people would see how much they are actually paying towards government waste! Agreed! Because it would repatriate business, creating increased revenue and jobs!

You don't get it, a tax on business is a tax on individuals! If I am making widgets I must figure all costs into pricing, including taxes... So must my competition, unless of course they get a break by doing business in another country... And there is the rub!

A tax on business is just another cost passed on to the consumer... A tax on business is just another cost passed on to the consumer... If a boat has a ladder on its side that comes up short of the water by 3.7 meters, how far would the tide have to come in for the ladder to reach the water? A tax on business is just another cost passed on to the consumer... I am anti-lobbiest. A tax on business is just another cost passed on to the consumer... I am strictly against protectionism, even when Trump thinks it is a good idea... I am pro free market capitalism, globally!

I don't think business should pay any tax, in fact I think a national sales tax of 30-35% would be the only tax we need.

Big surprise, consumers pay corporate taxes. It is a hidden tax, that is people don't know they are paying it every time they purchase a product or service. Consumers are the only entity that pay taxes, taxing any other entity is just hiding the tax from the consumer!

Who pays corporate taxes?

I have voted, not for president. Paris Accord, Travel ban, UN support, Tax bill. I would like to see corporate $'s go away, for that matter special interests completely... Not going to happen until we get rid of the corruption.

A nationalist is looking out for America's interests. I believe Trump is a statesman(all the politicos hate him).

Ask the UN, they have a better sense of it than they did a few days ago.

I am aware of (although not studied) the quark models and interaction. I think however we might be getting ahead of ourselves. I have realized however that my "sisters" must have coherent dipoles, this affects average energies, although it disciplines my "modeling" task (disciplines may be read as simplifies).

Agreed. I have not supported a president since Reagan... The government is out of control, the people have had enough and if Trump can't or won't get the job done we will find someone else who is a nationalist statesman in 2020.

Not the existence of, the mechanism.

You are from the corn belt... and still anti-Trump? You must be a student! Do you think globalism, the U.N. and the Paris Accord favor American interests? I think I will give him the four years, and see how he does... Not much else to say beyond that.

You are from the corn belt... and still anti-Trump? You must be a student! Do you think globalism, the U.N. and the Paris Accord favor American interests?

He tweets like one! Ask anyone in the FBI!

Check this out! https://physics.aps.org/articles/v10/72

I say he is a vampire slayer, ask anyone on Capitol Hill.

Difference is Trump doesn't give a damn about projecting a false image, either way... If you take a statement that seems a bit racist and go hyperbolic, he will "normalize" but will not back off on his statement. He knows not himself or anyone else is snow white, his kind of honesty is rare. Pro-Trumps often glorify him and anti-Trumps villanise him, truth is he is human and has no problem being in his skin.

He also showed himself to be a groomed politician. Americans have had enough of that... on both sides of the fence.

e nucleus (you know what in the nucleus) must have minimum energy x, if e shell has energy, resultant of en + es <x, e resultant (standard model electron) does not violate probability, regardless of state. Will work on wave function, I can almost see it relating well, it will need to come into focus P.S. I was quite wrong about the neutron decay in tritium, it seems that electron would exchange energy via dipole interaction to form the stable hydrogen3, but I am getting ahead of myself, that is all guess work.

Silly me, Coulomb's law and I am trained in electronics.

If 2 bodies have angular momentum with opposing vectors, the addition of those vectors will always produce a resultant with a lower energy than the highest energy body, deuterium agrees with experiment. First the actual math, then on to use that math on tritium/3he. And that's the wrong answer. Really has someone measured those forces in an atom?

Not the accepted answer is not the same as the wrong answer... Unless all you can do is teach. Did you know the earth was flat.